John B Miller, Ting Yang, Alison W Rebman, Laura Cappelli, Clifton O Bingham, Marcia Daniela Villegas de Flores, Erika Darrah, John N Aucott
{"title":"莱姆病患者体内存在抗RA33抗体","authors":"John B Miller, Ting Yang, Alison W Rebman, Laura Cappelli, Clifton O Bingham, Marcia Daniela Villegas de Flores, Erika Darrah, John N Aucott","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>To determine if anti-RA33 antibodies, which can be seen in early forms of inflammatory arthritis, are present in patients with Lyme arthritis (LA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anti-RA33 antibodies were tested using a commercially available assay in patients with LA (n = 47) and compared with patients with erythema migrans who returned to health (EM RTH, n = 20) and those with post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD) (n = 50), characterized by noninflammatory arthralgia, as an observational comparative study utilizing Lyme-exposed patients from various original cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that anti-RA33 was present in higher proportions of patients with LA (23.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and PTLD (12.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.040) than healthy controls. There was also a trend toward a higher percentage of anti-RA33 positivity in patients with EM RTH versus controls (10.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.080). There were no statistically significant differences among groups of patients with LA, PTLD, and EM RTH (p ≥ 0.567). There was also no difference in the proportion of patients with antibiotic-responsive LA compared with those with persistent synovitis after antibiotics, termed post-infectious LA, and there were no differences in clinical manifestations, musculoskeletal ultrasound evaluation (synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler, tendinopathy), or patient-reported outcomes based on anti-RA33 status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to identify anti-RA33 antibodies in patients with LA, though these antibodies did not identify a unique clinical subset of patients in this cohort. Unexpectedly, we found anti-RA33 antibodies at similar levels in patients with PTLD and EM RTH; further study is needed to determine the relevance of this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14745,"journal":{"name":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-RA33 Antibodies Are Present in Patients With Lyme Disease.\",\"authors\":\"John B Miller, Ting Yang, Alison W Rebman, Laura Cappelli, Clifton O Bingham, Marcia Daniela Villegas de Flores, Erika Darrah, John N Aucott\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>To determine if anti-RA33 antibodies, which can be seen in early forms of inflammatory arthritis, are present in patients with Lyme arthritis (LA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anti-RA33 antibodies were tested using a commercially available assay in patients with LA (n = 47) and compared with patients with erythema migrans who returned to health (EM RTH, n = 20) and those with post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD) (n = 50), characterized by noninflammatory arthralgia, as an observational comparative study utilizing Lyme-exposed patients from various original cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that anti-RA33 was present in higher proportions of patients with LA (23.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and PTLD (12.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.040) than healthy controls. There was also a trend toward a higher percentage of anti-RA33 positivity in patients with EM RTH versus controls (10.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.080). There were no statistically significant differences among groups of patients with LA, PTLD, and EM RTH (p ≥ 0.567). There was also no difference in the proportion of patients with antibiotic-responsive LA compared with those with persistent synovitis after antibiotics, termed post-infectious LA, and there were no differences in clinical manifestations, musculoskeletal ultrasound evaluation (synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler, tendinopathy), or patient-reported outcomes based on anti-RA33 status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to identify anti-RA33 antibodies in patients with LA, though these antibodies did not identify a unique clinical subset of patients in this cohort. Unexpectedly, we found anti-RA33 antibodies at similar levels in patients with PTLD and EM RTH; further study is needed to determine the relevance of this finding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的确定莱姆关节炎(LA)患者中是否存在抗RA33抗体,这种抗体可出现在早期炎症性关节炎中:方法:使用市售检测试剂盒检测 LA 患者(n = 47)的抗RA33 抗体,并与恢复健康的偏头痛红斑患者(EM RTH,n = 20)和治疗后莱姆病(PTLD)患者(n = 50)(以非炎症性关节痛为特征)进行比较,作为一项观察性比较研究,利用来自不同原始队列的莱姆暴露患者:我们发现,与健康对照组相比,LA(23.4% vs. 0%,p = 0.001)和 PTLD(12.0% vs. 0%,p = 0.040)患者中抗RA33 的比例更高。此外,与对照组相比,EM RTH 患者的抗 RA33 阳性率也呈上升趋势(10.0% vs. 0%,p = 0.080)。LA、PTLD 和 EM RTH 患者组间差异无统计学意义(p ≥ 0.567)。抗生素反应性LA患者与抗生素治疗后滑膜炎持续存在(称为感染后LA)的患者比例也没有差异,临床表现、肌肉骨骼超声评估(滑膜肥厚、动力多普勒、肌腱病)或患者报告的结果也没有因抗RA33状态而产生差异:这是首次在LA患者中发现抗RA33抗体的研究,但这些抗体并不能确定该组患者的独特临床亚群。意外的是,我们在PTLD和EM RTH患者中发现了相似水平的抗RA33抗体;要确定这一发现的相关性,还需要进一步研究。
Anti-RA33 Antibodies Are Present in Patients With Lyme Disease.
Background/objective: To determine if anti-RA33 antibodies, which can be seen in early forms of inflammatory arthritis, are present in patients with Lyme arthritis (LA).
Methods: Anti-RA33 antibodies were tested using a commercially available assay in patients with LA (n = 47) and compared with patients with erythema migrans who returned to health (EM RTH, n = 20) and those with post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD) (n = 50), characterized by noninflammatory arthralgia, as an observational comparative study utilizing Lyme-exposed patients from various original cohorts.
Results: We found that anti-RA33 was present in higher proportions of patients with LA (23.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and PTLD (12.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.040) than healthy controls. There was also a trend toward a higher percentage of anti-RA33 positivity in patients with EM RTH versus controls (10.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.080). There were no statistically significant differences among groups of patients with LA, PTLD, and EM RTH (p ≥ 0.567). There was also no difference in the proportion of patients with antibiotic-responsive LA compared with those with persistent synovitis after antibiotics, termed post-infectious LA, and there were no differences in clinical manifestations, musculoskeletal ultrasound evaluation (synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler, tendinopathy), or patient-reported outcomes based on anti-RA33 status.
Conclusions: This is the first study to identify anti-RA33 antibodies in patients with LA, though these antibodies did not identify a unique clinical subset of patients in this cohort. Unexpectedly, we found anti-RA33 antibodies at similar levels in patients with PTLD and EM RTH; further study is needed to determine the relevance of this finding.
期刊介绍:
JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology the peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that rheumatologists asked for. Each issue contains practical information on patient care in a clinically oriented, easy-to-read format. Our commitment is to timely, relevant coverage of the topics and issues shaping current practice. We pack each issue with original articles, case reports, reviews, brief reports, expert commentary, letters to the editor, and more. This is where you''ll find the answers to tough patient management issues as well as the latest information about technological advances affecting your practice.