Megan H Goh, Ali Kiapour, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew M Pfeiffer, Erhan Okay, Thomas Gausepohl, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
{"title":"关于放射治疗对髓内光动力植入物弯曲刚度的体外效应的试验性研究。","authors":"Megan H Goh, Ali Kiapour, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew M Pfeiffer, Erhan Okay, Thomas Gausepohl, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05272-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photodynamic implants are an increasingly popular minimally invasive option for the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease. Following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is frequently administered to achieve better disease control and improve patient quality of life, but the role of RT in implant failures associated with photodynamic implants remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine if the therapeutic RT range of 10-50 Gy affects the biomechanical properties of photodynamic implants. For the experimental group, 15 photodynamic implants were divided evenly into 5 groups that were exposed to different doses of RT (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy). The control group consisted of 14 non-irradiated photodynamic implants. Four-point bending tests were conducted on all implants to determine bending stiffness. One-way ANOVA was conducted. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the non-irradiated control group was 38.0 ± 1.2. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the irradiated experimental groups was 39.2 ± 1.0. No significant difference was found between any groups. RT doses at a range of 10-50 Gy do not affect the bending stiffness of photodynamic implants. The yield and ultimate failure loads were 263.4 ± 5.2 (N) and 305.9 ± 5.5 (N) in the non-irradiated group vs. 266.8 ± 6.4 (N) and 306.8 ± 6.4 (N) in the irradiated group, respectively. The lack of statistical significance in the difference in stiffness, yield, and ultimate load properties among the groups means that it is less likely that RT at the evaluated doses contributes to intrinsic implant failure. Further studies need to be conducted to conclude the potential effect of RT on other mechanical properties of photodynamic implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants.\",\"authors\":\"Megan H Goh, Ali Kiapour, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew M Pfeiffer, Erhan Okay, Thomas Gausepohl, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-024-05272-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Photodynamic implants are an increasingly popular minimally invasive option for the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease. Following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is frequently administered to achieve better disease control and improve patient quality of life, but the role of RT in implant failures associated with photodynamic implants remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine if the therapeutic RT range of 10-50 Gy affects the biomechanical properties of photodynamic implants. For the experimental group, 15 photodynamic implants were divided evenly into 5 groups that were exposed to different doses of RT (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy). The control group consisted of 14 non-irradiated photodynamic implants. Four-point bending tests were conducted on all implants to determine bending stiffness. One-way ANOVA was conducted. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the non-irradiated control group was 38.0 ± 1.2. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the irradiated experimental groups was 39.2 ± 1.0. No significant difference was found between any groups. RT doses at a range of 10-50 Gy do not affect the bending stiffness of photodynamic implants. The yield and ultimate failure loads were 263.4 ± 5.2 (N) and 305.9 ± 5.5 (N) in the non-irradiated group vs. 266.8 ± 6.4 (N) and 306.8 ± 6.4 (N) in the irradiated group, respectively. The lack of statistical significance in the difference in stiffness, yield, and ultimate load properties among the groups means that it is less likely that RT at the evaluated doses contributes to intrinsic implant failure. Further studies need to be conducted to conclude the potential effect of RT on other mechanical properties of photodynamic implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05272-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05272-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants.
Photodynamic implants are an increasingly popular minimally invasive option for the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease. Following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is frequently administered to achieve better disease control and improve patient quality of life, but the role of RT in implant failures associated with photodynamic implants remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine if the therapeutic RT range of 10-50 Gy affects the biomechanical properties of photodynamic implants. For the experimental group, 15 photodynamic implants were divided evenly into 5 groups that were exposed to different doses of RT (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy). The control group consisted of 14 non-irradiated photodynamic implants. Four-point bending tests were conducted on all implants to determine bending stiffness. One-way ANOVA was conducted. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the non-irradiated control group was 38.0 ± 1.2. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the irradiated experimental groups was 39.2 ± 1.0. No significant difference was found between any groups. RT doses at a range of 10-50 Gy do not affect the bending stiffness of photodynamic implants. The yield and ultimate failure loads were 263.4 ± 5.2 (N) and 305.9 ± 5.5 (N) in the non-irradiated group vs. 266.8 ± 6.4 (N) and 306.8 ± 6.4 (N) in the irradiated group, respectively. The lack of statistical significance in the difference in stiffness, yield, and ultimate load properties among the groups means that it is less likely that RT at the evaluated doses contributes to intrinsic implant failure. Further studies need to be conducted to conclude the potential effect of RT on other mechanical properties of photodynamic implants.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.