可切除的胃癌:是否应根据微卫星状态采用量身定制的手术策略?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101890
Edoardo Maria Muttillo, Leonardo Di Cicco, Alice La Franca, Alessio Lucarini, Giulia Arrivi, Francesco Saverio Li Causi, Giorgio Castagnola, Andrea Scarinci, Emanuela Pilozzi, Federica Mazzuca, Genoveffa Balducci, Roberto Luca Meniconi, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Paolo Mercantini
{"title":"可切除的胃癌:是否应根据微卫星状态采用量身定制的手术策略?","authors":"Edoardo Maria Muttillo, Leonardo Di Cicco, Alice La Franca, Alessio Lucarini, Giulia Arrivi, Francesco Saverio Li Causi, Giorgio Castagnola, Andrea Scarinci, Emanuela Pilozzi, Federica Mazzuca, Genoveffa Balducci, Roberto Luca Meniconi, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Paolo Mercantini","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microsatellite instability (MSI-H) represents a small subgroup of gastric cancer (GC) with a favorable prognostic and predictive significance. This study aimed to investigate locoregional nodes involvement, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the interplay between molecular subtypes and histological profiles in relation to survival outcomes in MSI versus MSS GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 72 GC patients treated with surgery with or without chemotherapy from 2017 to 2023. Clinicopathological characteristics, OS and DFS were compared between LN-positive and negative patients, stratified by microsatellite status, treatments, molecular profiles, tumor cell types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MSI GC was more common in older patients (79.0 versus 70.2 years, p<0.001), predominantly females (73.68% vs. 43.32%, p=0.023), and associated with intestinaltype histology (94.5% vs. 49%, p=0.002). Positive LN and lymphovascular invasion were lower in the MSI group (2.73 vs. 4.15 p=0.366; 36.8% vs. 64.5% p=0.039). MSI showed slightly better OS and DFS (84.2% vs. 66% p=0.108; 84.62% vs. 63.89% p=0.120). MSI GC also had improved OS and DFS in both LNs positive (OS 72.7% vs. 61.3% p=0.255; DFS 75% vs. 50% p=0.148) and LNs negative groups (OS 100% vs. 85.7% p=0.149; DFS 100% vs. 85.7% p=0.376). In patients not receiving chemotherapy, MSI/intestinal-type had the highest OS and DFS (77% and 87.5%), whereas MSS/mixed-type group had the poorest (25% and 100%)(p=0.024 and p=0.290). With chemotherapy, MSI/intestinal-type had the highest OS and DFS (100% and 100%), whereas MSS/mixed-type group had the poorest (66.7% and 50%)(p=0.741 and p=0.397, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSI GCs have a significantly lower risk of locoregional lymph node involvement and better OS and DFS compared to MSS tumors. Secondly, treatment responses diverge based on MSI status: patients with MSI tumors benefit more from upfront surgical interventions, while those with MSS, particularly mixed histotypes, demonstrate improved outcomes with preoperative chemotherapy. These results advocate for a tailored therapeutic approach that considers microsatellite status, Lauren classification as well as clinical conditions of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"101890"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resectable gastric cancer: should we apply a tailored surgical strategy according to microsatellite status?\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Maria Muttillo, Leonardo Di Cicco, Alice La Franca, Alessio Lucarini, Giulia Arrivi, Francesco Saverio Li Causi, Giorgio Castagnola, Andrea Scarinci, Emanuela Pilozzi, Federica Mazzuca, Genoveffa Balducci, Roberto Luca Meniconi, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Paolo Mercantini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microsatellite instability (MSI-H) represents a small subgroup of gastric cancer (GC) with a favorable prognostic and predictive significance. This study aimed to investigate locoregional nodes involvement, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the interplay between molecular subtypes and histological profiles in relation to survival outcomes in MSI versus MSS GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 72 GC patients treated with surgery with or without chemotherapy from 2017 to 2023. Clinicopathological characteristics, OS and DFS were compared between LN-positive and negative patients, stratified by microsatellite status, treatments, molecular profiles, tumor cell types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MSI GC was more common in older patients (79.0 versus 70.2 years, p<0.001), predominantly females (73.68% vs. 43.32%, p=0.023), and associated with intestinaltype histology (94.5% vs. 49%, p=0.002). Positive LN and lymphovascular invasion were lower in the MSI group (2.73 vs. 4.15 p=0.366; 36.8% vs. 64.5% p=0.039). MSI showed slightly better OS and DFS (84.2% vs. 66% p=0.108; 84.62% vs. 63.89% p=0.120). MSI GC also had improved OS and DFS in both LNs positive (OS 72.7% vs. 61.3% p=0.255; DFS 75% vs. 50% p=0.148) and LNs negative groups (OS 100% vs. 85.7% p=0.149; DFS 100% vs. 85.7% p=0.376). In patients not receiving chemotherapy, MSI/intestinal-type had the highest OS and DFS (77% and 87.5%), whereas MSS/mixed-type group had the poorest (25% and 100%)(p=0.024 and p=0.290). With chemotherapy, MSI/intestinal-type had the highest OS and DFS (100% and 100%), whereas MSS/mixed-type group had the poorest (66.7% and 50%)(p=0.741 and p=0.397, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSI GCs have a significantly lower risk of locoregional lymph node involvement and better OS and DFS compared to MSS tumors. Secondly, treatment responses diverge based on MSI status: patients with MSI tumors benefit more from upfront surgical interventions, while those with MSS, particularly mixed histotypes, demonstrate improved outcomes with preoperative chemotherapy. These results advocate for a tailored therapeutic approach that considers microsatellite status, Lauren classification as well as clinical conditions of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H)是胃癌(GC)的一个小亚组,具有良好的预后和预测意义。本研究旨在调查MSI与MSS GC的局部区域结节受累、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),以及分子亚型和组织学特征之间的相互作用与生存结果的关系:本研究纳入了2017年至2023年期间接受手术治疗或未接受化疗的72例GC患者。比较了LN阳性和阴性患者的临床病理特征、OS和DFS,并根据微卫星状态、治疗方法、分子谱、肿瘤细胞类型进行了分层:结果:MSI GC在年龄较大的患者中更为常见(79.0岁对70.2岁,P结论:MSI GC在年龄较大的患者中更为常见(79.0岁对70.2岁,P结论):与MSS肿瘤相比,MSI GC局部淋巴结受累的风险明显较低,OS和DFS较好。其次,治疗反应因 MSI 状态而异:MSI 肿瘤患者从前期手术干预中获益更多,而 MSS 患者,尤其是混合组织型患者,术前化疗可改善预后。这些结果主张采用一种考虑微卫星状态、劳伦分类以及患者临床状况的定制治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resectable gastric cancer: should we apply a tailored surgical strategy according to microsatellite status?

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI-H) represents a small subgroup of gastric cancer (GC) with a favorable prognostic and predictive significance. This study aimed to investigate locoregional nodes involvement, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the interplay between molecular subtypes and histological profiles in relation to survival outcomes in MSI versus MSS GC.

Methods: This study included 72 GC patients treated with surgery with or without chemotherapy from 2017 to 2023. Clinicopathological characteristics, OS and DFS were compared between LN-positive and negative patients, stratified by microsatellite status, treatments, molecular profiles, tumor cell types.

Results: MSI GC was more common in older patients (79.0 versus 70.2 years, p<0.001), predominantly females (73.68% vs. 43.32%, p=0.023), and associated with intestinaltype histology (94.5% vs. 49%, p=0.002). Positive LN and lymphovascular invasion were lower in the MSI group (2.73 vs. 4.15 p=0.366; 36.8% vs. 64.5% p=0.039). MSI showed slightly better OS and DFS (84.2% vs. 66% p=0.108; 84.62% vs. 63.89% p=0.120). MSI GC also had improved OS and DFS in both LNs positive (OS 72.7% vs. 61.3% p=0.255; DFS 75% vs. 50% p=0.148) and LNs negative groups (OS 100% vs. 85.7% p=0.149; DFS 100% vs. 85.7% p=0.376). In patients not receiving chemotherapy, MSI/intestinal-type had the highest OS and DFS (77% and 87.5%), whereas MSS/mixed-type group had the poorest (25% and 100%)(p=0.024 and p=0.290). With chemotherapy, MSI/intestinal-type had the highest OS and DFS (100% and 100%), whereas MSS/mixed-type group had the poorest (66.7% and 50%)(p=0.741 and p=0.397, respectively).

Conclusions: MSI GCs have a significantly lower risk of locoregional lymph node involvement and better OS and DFS compared to MSS tumors. Secondly, treatment responses diverge based on MSI status: patients with MSI tumors benefit more from upfront surgical interventions, while those with MSS, particularly mixed histotypes, demonstrate improved outcomes with preoperative chemotherapy. These results advocate for a tailored therapeutic approach that considers microsatellite status, Lauren classification as well as clinical conditions of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
GI Surgery Summit White Paper: Recruiting and Training the Next Generation of Surgeons. Visualization technology-assisted laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy plus biliary reconstruction for complex biliary dilatation: Combined caudo-peripheral approach with cranio-dorsal approach. Endoscopic 'Step-Up' Myotomy: A Salvage Technique for Full-Thickness Tunnel Entry in End-Stage Achalasia. Metachronous gastric metastasis from clear cell renal cell carcinoma presenting with Gastrointestinal bleeding. Long term follow-up of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease after Previous Abscess Drainage; A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1