Jason McMullan, B Woods Curry, Dustin Calhoun, Frank Forde, J Jordan Gray, Thomas Lardaro, Ashley Larrimore, Dustin LeBlanc, James Li, Sean Morgan, Matthew Neth, Woodrow Sams, John Lyng
{"title":"院前创伤简编:创伤中的液体复苏 - NAEMSP 的立场声明和资源文件。","authors":"Jason McMullan, B Woods Curry, Dustin Calhoun, Frank Forde, J Jordan Gray, Thomas Lardaro, Ashley Larrimore, Dustin LeBlanc, James Li, Sean Morgan, Matthew Neth, Woodrow Sams, John Lyng","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. The topic of prehospital blood product administration is covered elsewhere.NAEMSP recommends:Isotonic crystalloid solutions should be the preferred fluids for use in prehospital trauma management. Specific choice of isotonic crystalloid solutions may be driven by medication compatibility and other operational issues.Permissive hypotension is reasonable in patients without traumatic brain injury (TBI).Avoiding or correcting hypotension in polytrauma patients with TBI may be a higher priority than restricting fluid use.Large volume crystalloid resuscitation should be generally avoided.Developing processes to administer warmed intravenous (IV) fluids is reasonable. • Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits.• Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered.• A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.\",\"authors\":\"Jason McMullan, B Woods Curry, Dustin Calhoun, Frank Forde, J Jordan Gray, Thomas Lardaro, Ashley Larrimore, Dustin LeBlanc, James Li, Sean Morgan, Matthew Neth, Woodrow Sams, John Lyng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. The topic of prehospital blood product administration is covered elsewhere.NAEMSP recommends:Isotonic crystalloid solutions should be the preferred fluids for use in prehospital trauma management. Specific choice of isotonic crystalloid solutions may be driven by medication compatibility and other operational issues.Permissive hypotension is reasonable in patients without traumatic brain injury (TBI).Avoiding or correcting hypotension in polytrauma patients with TBI may be a higher priority than restricting fluid use.Large volume crystalloid resuscitation should be generally avoided.Developing processes to administer warmed intravenous (IV) fluids is reasonable. • Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits.• Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered.• A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.
Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. The topic of prehospital blood product administration is covered elsewhere.NAEMSP recommends:Isotonic crystalloid solutions should be the preferred fluids for use in prehospital trauma management. Specific choice of isotonic crystalloid solutions may be driven by medication compatibility and other operational issues.Permissive hypotension is reasonable in patients without traumatic brain injury (TBI).Avoiding or correcting hypotension in polytrauma patients with TBI may be a higher priority than restricting fluid use.Large volume crystalloid resuscitation should be generally avoided.Developing processes to administer warmed intravenous (IV) fluids is reasonable. • Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits.• Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered.• A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.