对晚期 GEP 和肺部 NENs 加强使用 Lu-PRRT:一项随机研究对毒性的初步结果。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Neuroendocrinology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1159/000542328
Ilaria Grassi, Silvia Nicolini, Irene Marini, Federica Matteucci, Nicoletta Ranallo, Valentina Di Iorio, Anna Sarnelli, Flavia Foca, Manuela Monti, Lucia Fabbri, Lorenzo Fantini, Alice Rossi, Giovanni Paganelli, Stefano Severi, Maddalena Sansovini
{"title":"对晚期 GEP 和肺部 NENs 加强使用 Lu-PRRT:一项随机研究对毒性的初步结果。","authors":"Ilaria Grassi, Silvia Nicolini, Irene Marini, Federica Matteucci, Nicoletta Ranallo, Valentina Di Iorio, Anna Sarnelli, Flavia Foca, Manuela Monti, Lucia Fabbri, Lorenzo Fantini, Alice Rossi, Giovanni Paganelli, Stefano Severi, Maddalena Sansovini","doi":"10.1159/000542328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lu-PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors is usually delivered with a total cumulative activity (TCA) of 29.6 GBq, divided into 4 cycles and with fixed interval between cycles (IBCs) of 8 weeks. Based on previous radiobiological studies, reducing IBC could improve efficacy without increasing toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety of Lu-PRRT with two different IBC: intensive (every 5 weeks) or standard (every 8-10 weeks).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2016 to July 2018, patients with advanced and progressive GEP and bronchial NENs were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase II study. Patients with risk factors for toxicity (RF) were planned for a TCA of 18.5 GBq, patients without RF of 27.8 GBq, divided into 5 cycles. Patients were then randomly assigned to be treated according to the intensive or to the standard IBC. Toxicity was monitored according to CTCAE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty patients (61 in the intensive group and 59 in the standard one) were evaluable for overall toxicity. Five patients (4.1%) had major (G3) hematological toxicity, 2 in the intensive group and 3 in the standard one. Other G3 toxicities related to creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, nausea, and asthenia were observed in the intensive group. 112 patients (54 in the intensive group and 58 in the standard one) performed at least 2 cycles and were also evaluable for cycle-by-cycle toxicity, resulting similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our preliminary results, Lu-PRRT administered intensively could be considered as safe as the standard schedule, when TCA is chosen according to the RF. Further data are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19117,"journal":{"name":"Neuroendocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lu-PRRT Used More Intensively on Advanced Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic and Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Preliminary Results on Toxicity from a Randomized Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Grassi, Silvia Nicolini, Irene Marini, Federica Matteucci, Nicoletta Ranallo, Valentina Di Iorio, Anna Sarnelli, Flavia Foca, Manuela Monti, Lucia Fabbri, Lorenzo Fantini, Alice Rossi, Giovanni Paganelli, Stefano Severi, Maddalena Sansovini\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lu-PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors is usually delivered with a total cumulative activity (TCA) of 29.6 GBq, divided into 4 cycles and with fixed interval between cycles (IBCs) of 8 weeks. Based on previous radiobiological studies, reducing IBC could improve efficacy without increasing toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety of Lu-PRRT with two different IBC: intensive (every 5 weeks) or standard (every 8-10 weeks).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2016 to July 2018, patients with advanced and progressive GEP and bronchial NENs were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase II study. Patients with risk factors for toxicity (RF) were planned for a TCA of 18.5 GBq, patients without RF of 27.8 GBq, divided into 5 cycles. Patients were then randomly assigned to be treated according to the intensive or to the standard IBC. Toxicity was monitored according to CTCAE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty patients (61 in the intensive group and 59 in the standard one) were evaluable for overall toxicity. Five patients (4.1%) had major (G3) hematological toxicity, 2 in the intensive group and 3 in the standard one. Other G3 toxicities related to creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, nausea, and asthenia were observed in the intensive group. 112 patients (54 in the intensive group and 58 in the standard one) performed at least 2 cycles and were also evaluable for cycle-by-cycle toxicity, resulting similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our preliminary results, Lu-PRRT administered intensively could be considered as safe as the standard schedule, when TCA is chosen according to the RF. Further data are needed to confirm these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroendocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroendocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542328\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介治疗 NET 的 Lu-PRRT 通常使用 29.6 GBq 的总累积活性(TCA),分为 4 个周期,周期之间的固定间隔(IBC)为 8 周。根据前期的放射生物学研究,缩短 IBC 可以在不增加毒性的情况下提高疗效。本研究的目的是评估Lu-PRRT两种不同IBC的安全性:强化(每5周一次)或标准(每8-10周一次):2016年5月至2018年7月,一项前瞻性随机II期研究招募了晚期和进展期GEP和支气管NEN患者。有毒性风险因素(RF)的患者计划接受18.5 GBq的TCA,无RF的患者接受27.8 GBq的TCA,分为5个周期。然后随机分配患者接受强化治疗或标准IBC治疗。根据CTCAE监测毒性:120名患者(61名在强化组,59名在标准组)的总体毒性可接受评估。5名患者(4.1%)出现严重(G3)血液学毒性,其中强化组2人,标准组3人。强化组出现了与肌酐、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、恶心和气喘有关的其他 G3 毒性反应。112名患者(强化组54人,标准组58人)至少接受了2个周期的治疗,并对每个周期的毒性进行了评估,结果显示两组患者的毒性相似:根据我们的初步结果,在根据射频选择 TCA 的情况下,Lu-PRRT 强化治疗与标准治疗一样安全。需要更多数据来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lu-PRRT Used More Intensively on Advanced Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic and Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Preliminary Results on Toxicity from a Randomized Study.

Introduction: Lu-PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors is usually delivered with a total cumulative activity (TCA) of 29.6 GBq, divided into 4 cycles and with fixed interval between cycles (IBCs) of 8 weeks. Based on previous radiobiological studies, reducing IBC could improve efficacy without increasing toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety of Lu-PRRT with two different IBC: intensive (every 5 weeks) or standard (every 8-10 weeks).

Methods: From May 2016 to July 2018, patients with advanced and progressive GEP and bronchial NENs were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase II study. Patients with risk factors for toxicity (RF) were planned for a TCA of 18.5 GBq, patients without RF of 27.8 GBq, divided into 5 cycles. Patients were then randomly assigned to be treated according to the intensive or to the standard IBC. Toxicity was monitored according to CTCAE.

Results: One hundred and twenty patients (61 in the intensive group and 59 in the standard one) were evaluable for overall toxicity. Five patients (4.1%) had major (G3) hematological toxicity, 2 in the intensive group and 3 in the standard one. Other G3 toxicities related to creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, nausea, and asthenia were observed in the intensive group. 112 patients (54 in the intensive group and 58 in the standard one) performed at least 2 cycles and were also evaluable for cycle-by-cycle toxicity, resulting similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: According to our preliminary results, Lu-PRRT administered intensively could be considered as safe as the standard schedule, when TCA is chosen according to the RF. Further data are needed to confirm these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroendocrinology
Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neuroendocrinology'' publishes papers reporting original research in basic and clinical neuroendocrinology. The journal explores the complex interactions between neuronal networks and endocrine glands (in some instances also immunecells) in both central and peripheral nervous systems. Original contributions cover all aspects of the field, from molecular and cellular neuroendocrinology, physiology, pharmacology, and the neuroanatomy of neuroendocrine systems to neuroendocrine correlates of behaviour, clinical neuroendocrinology and neuroendocrine cancers. Readers also benefit from reviews by noted experts, which highlight especially active areas of current research, and special focus editions of topical interest.
期刊最新文献
Cocaine self-administration differentially modulates the content of cholesterol, progesterone and testosterone in the brain and plasma of male rats. Doppler Assessment of the Uterine Arteries is a Valuable Adjunct Tool for the Evaluation of Efficacy of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty. Involvement of the AVP/OT system and lateral septum in the modulation of anxiety/depression caused by 14-week and 20-week social isolation. Ectopic CRH/ACTH-Co-Secreting Neuroendocrine Tumors Leading to Cushing's Disease - A Case Presentation and Literature Review. Factors influencing costs of cancer care for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1