探索泰国理想的鼻部美学:趋势和参与者对鼻整形术的认识。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241299066
Chunanuch Kaewsomnuk, Surapol Suetrong, Wisoot Reechaipichitkul, Seksun Chainansamit, Pornthep Kasemsiri, Kan Komany, Patorn Piromchai
{"title":"探索泰国理想的鼻部美学:趋势和参与者对鼻整形术的认识。","authors":"Chunanuch Kaewsomnuk, Surapol Suetrong, Wisoot Reechaipichitkul, Seksun Chainansamit, Pornthep Kasemsiri, Kan Komany, Patorn Piromchai","doi":"10.1177/20503121241299066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Beauty standards vary across cultures and regions. To date, no research has identified ideal nasal profiles for Thai individuals. This study aims to determine the preferred nasal aesthetics among the Thai population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study employed an online self-assessment questionnaire to investigate the ideal nasal profiles among Thai adults aged 18-60. Data were collected from participants across all regions of Thailand and included demographic information, rhinoplasty intentions, and perceptions of ideal nasal features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1452 respondents, 35.74% (519 individuals) have either undergone or plan to undergo rhinoplasty, while the remaining 64.26% (933 individuals) expressed either no interest or uncertainty about the procedure. The ideal nasolabial angle was found to be between 97 and 108 degrees for males and 88 to 98 degrees for females, respectively. Male participants in the rhinoplasty and control groups exhibited statistically significant differences in nasolabial angle (<i>p</i> = 0.017), nasofrontal angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and alar-intercanthal distance ratio (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Female participants demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups in nasofacial angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and nasolabial angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified distinct ideal nasal profiles among the Thai general population and those considering rhinoplasty. Our findings differed from the neoclassical orbitonasal proportion (canon V). These findings offer insights into contemporary Thai beauty standards for the nose, which can inform clinical decision-making in nasal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"20503121241299066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring ideal nasal aesthetics in Thailand: Trends and participants' awareness of rhinoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Chunanuch Kaewsomnuk, Surapol Suetrong, Wisoot Reechaipichitkul, Seksun Chainansamit, Pornthep Kasemsiri, Kan Komany, Patorn Piromchai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503121241299066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Beauty standards vary across cultures and regions. To date, no research has identified ideal nasal profiles for Thai individuals. This study aims to determine the preferred nasal aesthetics among the Thai population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study employed an online self-assessment questionnaire to investigate the ideal nasal profiles among Thai adults aged 18-60. Data were collected from participants across all regions of Thailand and included demographic information, rhinoplasty intentions, and perceptions of ideal nasal features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1452 respondents, 35.74% (519 individuals) have either undergone or plan to undergo rhinoplasty, while the remaining 64.26% (933 individuals) expressed either no interest or uncertainty about the procedure. The ideal nasolabial angle was found to be between 97 and 108 degrees for males and 88 to 98 degrees for females, respectively. Male participants in the rhinoplasty and control groups exhibited statistically significant differences in nasolabial angle (<i>p</i> = 0.017), nasofrontal angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and alar-intercanthal distance ratio (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Female participants demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups in nasofacial angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and nasolabial angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified distinct ideal nasal profiles among the Thai general population and those considering rhinoplasty. Our findings differed from the neoclassical orbitonasal proportion (canon V). These findings offer insights into contemporary Thai beauty standards for the nose, which can inform clinical decision-making in nasal treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20503121241299066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241299066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241299066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同文化和地区的审美标准各不相同。迄今为止,还没有研究确定泰国人理想的鼻型。本研究旨在确定泰国人偏好的鼻部美学:本横断面研究采用在线自我评估问卷调查的方式,调查 18-60 岁泰国成年人的理想鼻型。数据来自泰国所有地区的参与者,包括人口统计学信息、鼻整形意向以及对理想鼻型的看法:在 1452 名受访者中,35.74%(519 人)已经或计划进行鼻整形手术,其余 64.26%(933 人)表示对该手术没有兴趣或不确定。研究发现,男性的理想鼻唇角在 97 至 108 度之间,女性的理想鼻唇角在 88 至 98 度之间。鼻整形组和对照组的男性参与者在鼻唇角(p = 0.017)、鼻额角(p p p p 结论)方面有显著的统计学差异:我们的研究在泰国普通人群和考虑进行鼻整形手术的人群中发现了不同的理想鼻型。我们的研究结果与新古典主义的眶鼻比例(卡农 V)不同。这些发现有助于了解泰国当代的鼻部美学标准,为鼻部治疗的临床决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring ideal nasal aesthetics in Thailand: Trends and participants' awareness of rhinoplasty.

Backgrounds: Beauty standards vary across cultures and regions. To date, no research has identified ideal nasal profiles for Thai individuals. This study aims to determine the preferred nasal aesthetics among the Thai population.

Methods: This cross-sectional study employed an online self-assessment questionnaire to investigate the ideal nasal profiles among Thai adults aged 18-60. Data were collected from participants across all regions of Thailand and included demographic information, rhinoplasty intentions, and perceptions of ideal nasal features.

Results: Of the 1452 respondents, 35.74% (519 individuals) have either undergone or plan to undergo rhinoplasty, while the remaining 64.26% (933 individuals) expressed either no interest or uncertainty about the procedure. The ideal nasolabial angle was found to be between 97 and 108 degrees for males and 88 to 98 degrees for females, respectively. Male participants in the rhinoplasty and control groups exhibited statistically significant differences in nasolabial angle (p = 0.017), nasofrontal angle (p < 0.001), and alar-intercanthal distance ratio (p < 0.001). Female participants demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups in nasofacial angle (p < 0.001) and nasolabial angle (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study identified distinct ideal nasal profiles among the Thai general population and those considering rhinoplasty. Our findings differed from the neoclassical orbitonasal proportion (canon V). These findings offer insights into contemporary Thai beauty standards for the nose, which can inform clinical decision-making in nasal treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Renal function outcomes in living kidney donors in a transplant center in Colombia. Exploring ideal nasal aesthetics in Thailand: Trends and participants' awareness of rhinoplasty. Refining patient care: Evaluating prescription practices of medical residents and interns in a teaching hospital through an audit. The impact of pathogenic BRCA1/2 tumor mutation status on high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer survival outcome: A multicenter study from Indonesia. Upper limb disabilities and associated factors among breast cancer survivors: A quantitative cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1