腰果和花生过敏儿童口服免疫疗法的安全性--一项回顾性单中心研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.57187/s.3691
Maria Breiding, Maarja Soomann, Michèle Roth, Johannes Trück, Felicitas Bellutti Enders
{"title":"腰果和花生过敏儿童口服免疫疗法的安全性--一项回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Maria Breiding, Maarja Soomann, Michèle Roth, Johannes Trück, Felicitas Bellutti Enders","doi":"10.57187/s.3691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is increasingly used for the treatment of childhood food allergies, with limited data available on cashew nut OIT. This real-life study investigated the safety and feasibility of cashew nut OIT, comparing it with peanut OIT, with a focus on the up-dosing process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed cashew nut (n = 24) and peanut (n = 38) OIT cases with treatment initiated between 2018 and 2022 at the University Children's Hospital Basel. All patients who commenced therapy within this time frame were enrolled without prior selection. Two different starting protocols were used. Within the up-dosing protocol, the nut intake was incrementally increased by 20-30% every 2 weeks until reaching a maintenance dose of 1 g of nut protein. After consuming the maintenance dose regularly for 18-24 months, a second oral food challenge was performed. Patients who passed this challenge were considered desensitised. The safety of the therapy was evaluated based on the severity of adverse reactions during the up-dosing phase. Symptom severity was evaluated using the validated ordinal food allergy severity scale (o-FASS-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 33% of cashew nut-allergic and 63% of peanut-allergic patients experienced mild to moderate allergic reactions. Severe allergic reactions occurred in five peanut-allergic children with high baseline allergen-specific IgE levels. Six patients with peanut, and none with cashew nut OIT, discontinued the therapy due to adverse reactions. The mean duration to reach the maintenance phase was longer for children with asthma or another food allergy. Among children who already underwent the second oral food challenge, desensitisation was achieved in 91% (11 out of 12) of cashew nut- and 73% (11 out of 15) of peanut-allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cashew nut OIT had a low severity of adverse reactions and was generally well-tolerated. However, patient characteristics influenced side effect risk and treatment duration, emphasising the need for individualised OIT strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"154 ","pages":"3691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of oral immunotherapy for cashew nut and peanut allergy in children - a retrospective single-centre study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Breiding, Maarja Soomann, Michèle Roth, Johannes Trück, Felicitas Bellutti Enders\",\"doi\":\"10.57187/s.3691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is increasingly used for the treatment of childhood food allergies, with limited data available on cashew nut OIT. This real-life study investigated the safety and feasibility of cashew nut OIT, comparing it with peanut OIT, with a focus on the up-dosing process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed cashew nut (n = 24) and peanut (n = 38) OIT cases with treatment initiated between 2018 and 2022 at the University Children's Hospital Basel. All patients who commenced therapy within this time frame were enrolled without prior selection. Two different starting protocols were used. Within the up-dosing protocol, the nut intake was incrementally increased by 20-30% every 2 weeks until reaching a maintenance dose of 1 g of nut protein. After consuming the maintenance dose regularly for 18-24 months, a second oral food challenge was performed. Patients who passed this challenge were considered desensitised. The safety of the therapy was evaluated based on the severity of adverse reactions during the up-dosing phase. Symptom severity was evaluated using the validated ordinal food allergy severity scale (o-FASS-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 33% of cashew nut-allergic and 63% of peanut-allergic patients experienced mild to moderate allergic reactions. Severe allergic reactions occurred in five peanut-allergic children with high baseline allergen-specific IgE levels. Six patients with peanut, and none with cashew nut OIT, discontinued the therapy due to adverse reactions. The mean duration to reach the maintenance phase was longer for children with asthma or another food allergy. Among children who already underwent the second oral food challenge, desensitisation was achieved in 91% (11 out of 12) of cashew nut- and 73% (11 out of 15) of peanut-allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cashew nut OIT had a low severity of adverse reactions and was generally well-tolerated. However, patient characteristics influenced side effect risk and treatment duration, emphasising the need for individualised OIT strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"3691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3691\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的口服免疫疗法(OIT)越来越多地用于治疗儿童食物过敏,但有关腰果 OIT 的数据却很有限。这项现实生活研究调查了腰果口服免疫疗法的安全性和可行性,并将其与花生口服免疫疗法进行了比较,重点是上量过程:我们分析了2018年至2022年期间在巴塞尔大学儿童医院开始治疗的腰果(24例)和花生(38例)OIT病例。所有在此期间开始治疗的患者均未经过事先筛选而被纳入。采用了两种不同的起始方案。在增加剂量方案中,坚果摄入量每两周递增20%-30%,直至达到1克坚果蛋白的维持剂量。在定期摄入维持剂量 18-24 个月后,进行第二次口服食物挑战。通过这次挑战的患者被视为脱敏患者。根据增加剂量阶段不良反应的严重程度来评估治疗的安全性。症状严重程度采用经过验证的食物过敏严重程度序数量表(o-FASS-5)进行评估:在研究期间,33% 的腰果过敏患者和 63% 的花生过敏患者出现了轻度至中度过敏反应。基线过敏原特异性 IgE 水平较高的 5 名花生过敏儿童出现了严重过敏反应。六名花生过敏症患者因不良反应停止了治疗,没有腰果过敏症患者因不良反应停止治疗。对于患有哮喘或其他食物过敏症的儿童来说,进入维持阶段的平均时间更长。在已经接受第二次口服食物挑战的儿童中,91%的腰果过敏患者(12人中有11人)和73%的花生过敏患者(15人中有11人)实现了脱敏:腰果 OIT 的不良反应严重程度较低,一般都能很好地耐受。然而,患者的特征会影响副作用风险和治疗时间,这就强调了个体化 OIT 策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of oral immunotherapy for cashew nut and peanut allergy in children - a retrospective single-centre study.

Aim of the study: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is increasingly used for the treatment of childhood food allergies, with limited data available on cashew nut OIT. This real-life study investigated the safety and feasibility of cashew nut OIT, comparing it with peanut OIT, with a focus on the up-dosing process.

Methods: We analysed cashew nut (n = 24) and peanut (n = 38) OIT cases with treatment initiated between 2018 and 2022 at the University Children's Hospital Basel. All patients who commenced therapy within this time frame were enrolled without prior selection. Two different starting protocols were used. Within the up-dosing protocol, the nut intake was incrementally increased by 20-30% every 2 weeks until reaching a maintenance dose of 1 g of nut protein. After consuming the maintenance dose regularly for 18-24 months, a second oral food challenge was performed. Patients who passed this challenge were considered desensitised. The safety of the therapy was evaluated based on the severity of adverse reactions during the up-dosing phase. Symptom severity was evaluated using the validated ordinal food allergy severity scale (o-FASS-5).

Results: Over the study period, 33% of cashew nut-allergic and 63% of peanut-allergic patients experienced mild to moderate allergic reactions. Severe allergic reactions occurred in five peanut-allergic children with high baseline allergen-specific IgE levels. Six patients with peanut, and none with cashew nut OIT, discontinued the therapy due to adverse reactions. The mean duration to reach the maintenance phase was longer for children with asthma or another food allergy. Among children who already underwent the second oral food challenge, desensitisation was achieved in 91% (11 out of 12) of cashew nut- and 73% (11 out of 15) of peanut-allergic patients.

Conclusion: Cashew nut OIT had a low severity of adverse reactions and was generally well-tolerated. However, patient characteristics influenced side effect risk and treatment duration, emphasising the need for individualised OIT strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
期刊最新文献
Supplementum 284: Abstracts of the 56th Annual meeting of the Swiss Society of Nephrology. Safety of oral immunotherapy for cashew nut and peanut allergy in children - a retrospective single-centre study. Cardiac amyloidosis. Blood pressure control and antihypertensive treatment in Swiss general practice: a cross-sectional study using routine data. Exploring the real-world management of catheter-associated urinary tract infections by Swiss general practitioners and urologists: insights from an online survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1