德文版远程医疗可用性问卷及衍生简短问卷,用于评估远程医疗和数字治疗在医疗保健中的可用性和感知有用性:工具验证研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.2196/57771
Jannik Zimmermann, Harriet Morf, Florian Scharf, Johannes Knitza, Heidi Moeller, Felix Muehlensiepen, Michaela Nathrath, Till Orlemann, Thomas Voelker, Merlin Deckers
{"title":"德文版远程医疗可用性问卷及衍生简短问卷,用于评估远程医疗和数字治疗在医疗保健中的可用性和感知有用性:工具验证研究。","authors":"Jannik Zimmermann, Harriet Morf, Florian Scharf, Johannes Knitza, Heidi Moeller, Felix Muehlensiepen, Michaela Nathrath, Till Orlemann, Thomas Voelker, Merlin Deckers","doi":"10.2196/57771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The exponential growth of telehealth is revolutionizing health care delivery, but its evaluation has not matched the pace of its uptake. Various forms of assessment, from single-item to more extensive questionnaires, have been used to assess telehealth and digital therapeutics and their usability. The most frequently used questionnaire is the \"Telehealth Usability Questionnaire\" (TUQ). The use of the TUQ is limited by its restricted availability in languages other than English and its feasibility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to create a translated German TUQ version and to derive a short questionnaire for patients-\"Telehealth Usability and Perceived Usefulness Short Questionnaire for patients\" (TUUSQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a first step, the original 21-item TUQ was forward and back-translated twice. In the second step, 13 TUQ items were selected for their suitability for the general evaluation of telehealth on the basis of expert opinion. These 13 items were surveyed between July 2022 and September 2023 in 4 studies with patients and family members of palliative care, as well as patients with chronic autoimmune diseases, evaluating 13 health care apps, including digital therapeutics and a telehealth system (n1=128, n2=220, n3=30, and n4=12). Psychometric exploratory factor analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that a parsimonious factor structure with 2 factors (\"perceived usefulness in health care\" and \"usability\") is sufficient to describe the patient's perception. Consequently, the questionnaire could be shortened to 6 items without compromising its informativeness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a linguistically precise German version of the TUQ for assessing the usability and perceived usefulness of telehealth. Beyond that, we supply a highly feasible shortened version that is versatile for general use in telehealth, mobile health, and digital therapeutics, which distinguishes between the 2 factors \"perceived usefulness in health care\" and \"usability\" in patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e57771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jannik Zimmermann, Harriet Morf, Florian Scharf, Johannes Knitza, Heidi Moeller, Felix Muehlensiepen, Michaela Nathrath, Till Orlemann, Thomas Voelker, Merlin Deckers\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/57771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The exponential growth of telehealth is revolutionizing health care delivery, but its evaluation has not matched the pace of its uptake. Various forms of assessment, from single-item to more extensive questionnaires, have been used to assess telehealth and digital therapeutics and their usability. The most frequently used questionnaire is the \\\"Telehealth Usability Questionnaire\\\" (TUQ). The use of the TUQ is limited by its restricted availability in languages other than English and its feasibility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to create a translated German TUQ version and to derive a short questionnaire for patients-\\\"Telehealth Usability and Perceived Usefulness Short Questionnaire for patients\\\" (TUUSQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a first step, the original 21-item TUQ was forward and back-translated twice. In the second step, 13 TUQ items were selected for their suitability for the general evaluation of telehealth on the basis of expert opinion. These 13 items were surveyed between July 2022 and September 2023 in 4 studies with patients and family members of palliative care, as well as patients with chronic autoimmune diseases, evaluating 13 health care apps, including digital therapeutics and a telehealth system (n1=128, n2=220, n3=30, and n4=12). Psychometric exploratory factor analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that a parsimonious factor structure with 2 factors (\\\"perceived usefulness in health care\\\" and \\\"usability\\\") is sufficient to describe the patient's perception. Consequently, the questionnaire could be shortened to 6 items without compromising its informativeness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a linguistically precise German version of the TUQ for assessing the usability and perceived usefulness of telehealth. Beyond that, we supply a highly feasible shortened version that is versatile for general use in telehealth, mobile health, and digital therapeutics, which distinguishes between the 2 factors \\\"perceived usefulness in health care\\\" and \\\"usability\\\" in patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e57771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/57771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程医疗的指数式增长正在彻底改变医疗服务的提供方式,但对其进行评估的速度却跟不上其普及的步伐。各种形式的评估,从单一项目到更广泛的问卷,都被用来评估远程保健和数字疗法及其可用性。最常用的问卷是 "远程保健可用性问卷"(TUQ)。除英语外,"远程保健可用性问卷 "的其他语言版本有限,其可行性也有限:本研究的目的是创建一个德语 TUQ 翻译版本,并为患者设计一份简短的问卷--"患者远程保健可用性和感知有用性简短问卷"(TUUSQ):方法:第一步,对最初的 21 个项目的 TUQ 进行了两次正译和反译。第二步,根据专家意见,选择 13 个 TUQ 项目用于远程保健的一般评估。2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,在 4 项研究中对这 13 个项目进行了调查,调查对象包括姑息治疗患者和家属以及慢性自身免疫性疾病患者,对 13 种医疗保健应用程序(包括数字疗法和远程保健系统)进行了评估(n1=128、n2=220、n3=30 和 n4=12)。进行了心理测量探索性因子分析:分析结果表明,由 2 个因子("认为在医疗保健中有用 "和 "可用性")组成的简约因子结构足以描述患者的感知。因此,在不影响问卷信息量的情况下,问卷可缩短为 6 个项目:我们提供了一个语言精确的德语版 TUQ,用于评估远程医疗的可用性和感知有用性。此外,我们还提供了一个高度可行的简化版本,可广泛应用于远程医疗、移动医疗和数字治疗领域,并能区分 "医疗保健中的感知有用性 "和患者的 "可用性 "这两个因素:德国临床试验注册 DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study.

Background: The exponential growth of telehealth is revolutionizing health care delivery, but its evaluation has not matched the pace of its uptake. Various forms of assessment, from single-item to more extensive questionnaires, have been used to assess telehealth and digital therapeutics and their usability. The most frequently used questionnaire is the "Telehealth Usability Questionnaire" (TUQ). The use of the TUQ is limited by its restricted availability in languages other than English and its feasibility.

Objective: The aims of this study were to create a translated German TUQ version and to derive a short questionnaire for patients-"Telehealth Usability and Perceived Usefulness Short Questionnaire for patients" (TUUSQ).

Methods: As a first step, the original 21-item TUQ was forward and back-translated twice. In the second step, 13 TUQ items were selected for their suitability for the general evaluation of telehealth on the basis of expert opinion. These 13 items were surveyed between July 2022 and September 2023 in 4 studies with patients and family members of palliative care, as well as patients with chronic autoimmune diseases, evaluating 13 health care apps, including digital therapeutics and a telehealth system (n1=128, n2=220, n3=30, and n4=12). Psychometric exploratory factor analysis was conducted.

Results: The analysis revealed that a parsimonious factor structure with 2 factors ("perceived usefulness in health care" and "usability") is sufficient to describe the patient's perception. Consequently, the questionnaire could be shortened to 6 items without compromising its informativeness.

Conclusions: We provide a linguistically precise German version of the TUQ for assessing the usability and perceived usefulness of telehealth. Beyond that, we supply a highly feasible shortened version that is versatile for general use in telehealth, mobile health, and digital therapeutics, which distinguishes between the 2 factors "perceived usefulness in health care" and "usability" in patients.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Promise of AI for Image-Driven Medicine: Qualitative Interview Study of Radiologists' and Pathologists' Perspectives. Mobile App for Improving the Mental Health of Youth in Out-of-Home Care: Development Study Using an Intervention Mapping Approach. German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study. Exploring Patient, Proxy, and Clinician Perspectives on the Value and Impact of an Inpatient Portal: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Reducing the Number of Intrusive Memories of Work-Related Traumatic Events in Frontline Health Care Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1