孤立的可切除结直肠肺转移瘤的辅助化疗:使用逆概率治疗加权倾向分析的回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171
Zhao Gao, Shi-Kai Wu, Shi-Jie Zhang, Xin Wang, Ying-Chao Wu, Xuan Jin
{"title":"孤立的可切除结直肠肺转移瘤的辅助化疗:使用逆概率治疗加权倾向分析的回顾性研究。","authors":"Zhao Gao, Shi-Kai Wu, Shi-Jie Zhang, Xin Wang, Ying-Chao Wu, Xuan Jin","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). An inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to address indication bias. Survival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, Cox regression and confirmed by propensity score-matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range, 18.3-50.4 months), the 5-year OS, CSS and DFS were 72.0%, 74.4% and 51.3%, respectively. ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC [original cohort: <i>P</i> = 0.08; IPTW: <i>P</i> = 0.15]. No differences were observed for CSS (<i>P</i> = 0.12) and DFS (<i>P</i> = 0.68) between the ACT and non-ACT groups. Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival, while sublobar resection (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-1.00, <i>P</i> = 0.049) and longer disease-free interval (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.044) were associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 10","pages":"3171-3184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated resectable colorectal lung metastasis: A retrospective study using inverse probability treatment weighting propensity analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Gao, Shi-Kai Wu, Shi-Jie Zhang, Xin Wang, Ying-Chao Wu, Xuan Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). An inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to address indication bias. Survival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, Cox regression and confirmed by propensity score-matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range, 18.3-50.4 months), the 5-year OS, CSS and DFS were 72.0%, 74.4% and 51.3%, respectively. ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC [original cohort: <i>P</i> = 0.08; IPTW: <i>P</i> = 0.15]. No differences were observed for CSS (<i>P</i> = 0.12) and DFS (<i>P</i> = 0.68) between the ACT and non-ACT groups. Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival, while sublobar resection (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-1.00, <i>P</i> = 0.049) and longer disease-free interval (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.044) were associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"3171-3184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:评估辅助化疗(ACT)对结直肠癌(CRC)肺转移灶切除术后无疾病证据患者的疗效:这项研究纳入了2008年4月至2023年7月期间在一家机构接受肺转移切除术的96名CRC患者。主要终点是总生存期(OS);次要终点包括癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和无病生存期(DFS)。为解决适应症偏倚问题,进行了反治疗概率加权(IPTW)分析。采用卡普兰-梅耶曲线、对数秩检验、Cox回归对生存结果进行了比较,并通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行了确认:中位随访27.5个月(18.3-50.4个月),5年OS、CSS和DFS分别为72.0%、74.4%和51.3%。ACT对CRC PM切除术后的OS无明显影响[原始队列:P = 0.08;IPTW:P = 0.15]。ACT组和非ACT组的CSS(P = 0.12)和DFS(P = 0.68)无差异。多变量分析表明,ACT与提高生存率无关,而亚肺叶切除术(HR = 0.45;95%CI:0.20-1.00,P = 0.049)和更长的无病间隔期(HR = 0.45;95%CI:0.20-0.98,P = 0.044)与提高生存率有关:结论:ACT并不能提高CRC PM切除术后的生存率。结论:ACT 并不能提高 CRC PM 切除术后的生存率,需要进一步设计完善的随机对照试验来确定最佳的 ACT 方案和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated resectable colorectal lung metastasis: A retrospective study using inverse probability treatment weighting propensity analysis.

Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.

Methods: This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). An inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to address indication bias. Survival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, Cox regression and confirmed by propensity score-matching (PSM).

Results: With a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range, 18.3-50.4 months), the 5-year OS, CSS and DFS were 72.0%, 74.4% and 51.3%, respectively. ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC [original cohort: P = 0.08; IPTW: P = 0.15]. No differences were observed for CSS (P = 0.12) and DFS (P = 0.68) between the ACT and non-ACT groups. Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival, while sublobar resection (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-1.00, P = 0.049) and longer disease-free interval (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, P = 0.044) were associated with improved survival.

Conclusion: ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Massive simultaneous hepatic and renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumor benefitted from surgery and everolimus treatment: A case report. Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis: A case report. Prevention and management of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities of patients with gastrointestinal tumor. Postoperative serum tumor markers-based nomogram predicting early recurrence for patients undergoing radical resections of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Reassessment of palliative surgery in conversion therapy of previously unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Two case reports and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1