快速通道手术对肝胆手术患者围手术期护理的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3155
Xiao-Hong Wang, Fang-Fang Chen, Jia Pan, Yun-Fei Jiang, Min-Yue Yao, Jia-Li Mao, Ya-Feng Xu
{"title":"快速通道手术对肝胆手术患者围手术期护理的影响。","authors":"Xiao-Hong Wang, Fang-Fang Chen, Jia Pan, Yun-Fei Jiang, Min-Yue Yao, Jia-Li Mao, Ya-Feng Xu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fast-track surgery (FTS) is a modern nursing approach that has gained popularity in the perioperative phase of surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of FTS on perioperative care for hepatobiliary surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery and were admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to October 2023. They were divided into an observation group and a control group with 49 patients in each group according to different nursing directions. The control group was treated with standard nursing and the observation group was treated with FTS concept nursing. The length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, wound complications, nursing satisfaction, self-rating scale (SAS) score, and SF-36 quality of life (QoL) score were compared between the two groups before and after care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of hospitalization, hospitalization cost, operation time, first implantation time, exhaust time, and first defecation time were shorter than the observation group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group showed a significant difference between the VAS and SAS scores on days 1, 3, and 7 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was 4.05% was significantly lower than the 18.36% in the control group, and the comparison groups were statistically significant (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 5.018, <i>P</i> = 0.025). The observation group had a significantly higher level of nurse satisfaction (94.92%) than the control group (79.59%; <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6.078, <i>P</i> = 0.014). Both groups showed higher QoL scores after nursing care, with higher scores in the observation group than in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FTS in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery can effectively improve negative mood, QoL, and nursing satisfaction; reduce wound complications; and accelerate patient rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 10","pages":"3155-3162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of fast-track surgery on perioperative care in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Hong Wang, Fang-Fang Chen, Jia Pan, Yun-Fei Jiang, Min-Yue Yao, Jia-Li Mao, Ya-Feng Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fast-track surgery (FTS) is a modern nursing approach that has gained popularity in the perioperative phase of surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of FTS on perioperative care for hepatobiliary surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery and were admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to October 2023. They were divided into an observation group and a control group with 49 patients in each group according to different nursing directions. The control group was treated with standard nursing and the observation group was treated with FTS concept nursing. The length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, wound complications, nursing satisfaction, self-rating scale (SAS) score, and SF-36 quality of life (QoL) score were compared between the two groups before and after care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of hospitalization, hospitalization cost, operation time, first implantation time, exhaust time, and first defecation time were shorter than the observation group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group showed a significant difference between the VAS and SAS scores on days 1, 3, and 7 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was 4.05% was significantly lower than the 18.36% in the control group, and the comparison groups were statistically significant (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 5.018, <i>P</i> = 0.025). The observation group had a significantly higher level of nurse satisfaction (94.92%) than the control group (79.59%; <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6.078, <i>P</i> = 0.014). Both groups showed higher QoL scores after nursing care, with higher scores in the observation group than in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FTS in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery can effectively improve negative mood, QoL, and nursing satisfaction; reduce wound complications; and accelerate patient rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"3155-3162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:探讨快速通道手术(FTS)对肝胆外科围手术期护理的影响:方法:对我院2021年8月至2023年10月收治的98例肝胆外科手术患者进行回顾性分析。根据不同的护理方向将其分为观察组和对照组,每组 49 例。对照组采用标准护理,观察组采用 FTS 概念护理。比较两组患者护理前后的住院时间、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、伤口并发症、护理满意度、自评量表(SAS)评分和 SF-36 生活质量(QoL)评分:观察组的住院时间、住院费用、手术时间、首次植入时间、排气时间和首次排便时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,观察组在第 1、3 和 7 天的 VAS 和 SAS 评分差异显著(P < 0.05)。观察组的并发症发生率为 4.05%,明显低于对照组的 18.36%,两组比较有统计学意义(χ 2 = 5.018,P = 0.025)。观察组的护士满意度(94.92%)明显高于对照组(79.59%;χ 2 = 6.078,P = 0.014)。两组患者护理后QoL评分均较高,观察组评分高于对照组(P = 0.032):肝胆外科手术患者的 FTS 可有效改善患者的负性情绪、QoL 和护理满意度,减少伤口并发症,加速患者康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of fast-track surgery on perioperative care in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery.

Background: Fast-track surgery (FTS) is a modern nursing approach that has gained popularity in the perioperative phase of surgery.

Aim: To investigate the impact of FTS on perioperative care for hepatobiliary surgery.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery and were admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to October 2023. They were divided into an observation group and a control group with 49 patients in each group according to different nursing directions. The control group was treated with standard nursing and the observation group was treated with FTS concept nursing. The length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, wound complications, nursing satisfaction, self-rating scale (SAS) score, and SF-36 quality of life (QoL) score were compared between the two groups before and after care.

Results: The duration of hospitalization, hospitalization cost, operation time, first implantation time, exhaust time, and first defecation time were shorter than the observation group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group showed a significant difference between the VAS and SAS scores on days 1, 3, and 7 (P < 0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was 4.05% was significantly lower than the 18.36% in the control group, and the comparison groups were statistically significant (χ 2 = 5.018, P = 0.025). The observation group had a significantly higher level of nurse satisfaction (94.92%) than the control group (79.59%; χ 2 = 6.078, P = 0.014). Both groups showed higher QoL scores after nursing care, with higher scores in the observation group than in the control group (P = 0.032).

Conclusion: FTS in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery can effectively improve negative mood, QoL, and nursing satisfaction; reduce wound complications; and accelerate patient rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Massive simultaneous hepatic and renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumor benefitted from surgery and everolimus treatment: A case report. Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis: A case report. Prevention and management of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities of patients with gastrointestinal tumor. Postoperative serum tumor markers-based nomogram predicting early recurrence for patients undergoing radical resections of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Reassessment of palliative surgery in conversion therapy of previously unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Two case reports and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1