首次报道用于不完全脊髓损伤的新型外骨骼:FreeGait®。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2426314
Meriç Selim Şipal, Evren Yaşar, Zuhal Özişler, Emre Adıgüzel, Sinem Yıldırım, Ömür Deler, Selin Kirdiş, Halil İbrahim Çelik, Seda Biçici Uluşahin, Gülseren Kayalar, Aynur Ayşe Karaduman
{"title":"首次报道用于不完全脊髓损伤的新型外骨骼:FreeGait®。","authors":"Meriç Selim Şipal, Evren Yaşar, Zuhal Özişler, Emre Adıgüzel, Sinem Yıldırım, Ömür Deler, Selin Kirdiş, Halil İbrahim Çelik, Seda Biçici Uluşahin, Gülseren Kayalar, Aynur Ayşe Karaduman","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Intensive walking practice often demands capabilities that go beyond the limits for both patients and therapists. As a solution, robot-assisted exoskeletons have been developed to deliver efficient rehabilitation sessions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim was to evaluate the effect of adding exoskeleton training, the FreeGait®, to conventional treatment on walking status in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. The secondary aim was to assess its impact on mobility, functional independence, and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared exoskeleton gait training with conventional therapy (RBCT) versus conventional therapy alone (CT). Fourteen participants with motor incomplete spinal cord injury were included, with seven in each group. Both groups had 40-minute conventional therapy sessions 5 days a week. Additionally, the RBCT performed exoskeleton walking and balance exercises 3 days a week. The WISCI II (primary outcome), 10MWT, gait speed, TUG, BBS, SCIM III, and WHOQOL-BREF were used for evaluation (see text for acronyms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Walking status and mobility-related measures showed significant improvements in the RBCT (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the CT (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the physical health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF only in the RBCT. However, no significant differences were found in the WHOQOL-BREF total score in both groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of change (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gait training with the new exoskeleton combined with conventional therapy, positively contributes to walking status, mobility, and functional independence.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06137456.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait<sup>®</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Meriç Selim Şipal, Evren Yaşar, Zuhal Özişler, Emre Adıgüzel, Sinem Yıldırım, Ömür Deler, Selin Kirdiş, Halil İbrahim Çelik, Seda Biçici Uluşahin, Gülseren Kayalar, Aynur Ayşe Karaduman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Intensive walking practice often demands capabilities that go beyond the limits for both patients and therapists. As a solution, robot-assisted exoskeletons have been developed to deliver efficient rehabilitation sessions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim was to evaluate the effect of adding exoskeleton training, the FreeGait®, to conventional treatment on walking status in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. The secondary aim was to assess its impact on mobility, functional independence, and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared exoskeleton gait training with conventional therapy (RBCT) versus conventional therapy alone (CT). Fourteen participants with motor incomplete spinal cord injury were included, with seven in each group. Both groups had 40-minute conventional therapy sessions 5 days a week. Additionally, the RBCT performed exoskeleton walking and balance exercises 3 days a week. The WISCI II (primary outcome), 10MWT, gait speed, TUG, BBS, SCIM III, and WHOQOL-BREF were used for evaluation (see text for acronyms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Walking status and mobility-related measures showed significant improvements in the RBCT (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the CT (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the physical health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF only in the RBCT. However, no significant differences were found in the WHOQOL-BREF total score in both groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of change (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gait training with the new exoskeleton combined with conventional therapy, positively contributes to walking status, mobility, and functional independence.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06137456.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2426314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2426314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于患者和治疗师来说,密集的步行练习往往需要超越极限的能力。作为一种解决方案,机器人辅助外骨骼应运而生,以提供高效的康复治疗:主要目的是评估在常规治疗的基础上增加外骨骼训练 FreeGait® 对运动性不完全脊髓损伤患者行走状态的影响。次要目的是评估其对行动能力、功能独立性和与健康相关的生活质量的影响:本研究比较了外骨骼步态训练与传统疗法(RBCT)和单纯传统疗法(CT)。研究对象包括 14 名运动性不完全脊髓损伤患者,每组 7 人。两组患者均接受每周 5 天、每次 40 分钟的常规治疗。此外,RBCT 每周 3 天进行外骨骼行走和平衡练习。评估采用了 WISCI II(主要结果)、10MWT、步速、TUG、BBS、SCIM III 和 WHOQOL-BREF(缩写词见正文):结果:在 RBCT 中,行走状态和运动相关指标均有显著改善(P 0.05)。仅在 RBCT 中,WHOQOL-BREF 的身体健康领域有明显差异。然而,两组的 WHOQOL-BREF 总分均无明显差异(P>0.05)。此外,两组之间的变化也无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:使用新型外骨骼进行步态训练并结合常规治疗,对改善行走状况、提高活动能力和功能独立性有积极作用:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT06137456。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®.

Context: Intensive walking practice often demands capabilities that go beyond the limits for both patients and therapists. As a solution, robot-assisted exoskeletons have been developed to deliver efficient rehabilitation sessions.

Objective: The primary aim was to evaluate the effect of adding exoskeleton training, the FreeGait®, to conventional treatment on walking status in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. The secondary aim was to assess its impact on mobility, functional independence, and health-related quality of life.

Methods: This study compared exoskeleton gait training with conventional therapy (RBCT) versus conventional therapy alone (CT). Fourteen participants with motor incomplete spinal cord injury were included, with seven in each group. Both groups had 40-minute conventional therapy sessions 5 days a week. Additionally, the RBCT performed exoskeleton walking and balance exercises 3 days a week. The WISCI II (primary outcome), 10MWT, gait speed, TUG, BBS, SCIM III, and WHOQOL-BREF were used for evaluation (see text for acronyms).

Results: Walking status and mobility-related measures showed significant improvements in the RBCT (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the CT (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the physical health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF only in the RBCT. However, no significant differences were found in the WHOQOL-BREF total score in both groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of change (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Gait training with the new exoskeleton combined with conventional therapy, positively contributes to walking status, mobility, and functional independence.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06137456.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1