提高当前对脊髓损伤患者认知障碍的认识:英国临床医生调查。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2426313
Hamish Patel, Daniel Blackburn, Ram Hariharan, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair, Simon M Bell
{"title":"提高当前对脊髓损伤患者认知障碍的认识:英国临床医生调查。","authors":"Hamish Patel, Daniel Blackburn, Ram Hariharan, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair, Simon M Bell","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Emerging data suggests that patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment. The true incidence of cognitive impairment in this group is unclear due to the difficulty in administering commonly used assessment tools, which are dependent on functional abilities e.g. drawing and writing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question online survey, that aims to understand current practices on the assessment of cognition and the limitations of currently available tools, was sent via a Research Network Group to British Association of Spinal Cord Injury Specialists (BASCIS) registered clinicians at each of the 12 Spinal Injuries Centers in the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 responses from 11 different SCI centers, with most from clinicians who have worked with SCI patients for over 10 years. 68% felt that there was a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, 15% reported not using tools to screen for cognitive impairment, primarily due to lack of time, lack of guidelines, and physical disabilities affecting the ability to complete tests. When used, the most commonly utilized tools were those that rely on intact hand function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians report a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, currently used tools are not always appropriate, and patients with impaired hand function may be under-represented or undiagnosed. Further work is needed for a more standardized assessment tool to ensure that these patients receive appropriate diagnosis and management, particularly since cognitive impairment in this group can increase care needs and reduce engagement with rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey.\",\"authors\":\"Hamish Patel, Daniel Blackburn, Ram Hariharan, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair, Simon M Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Emerging data suggests that patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment. The true incidence of cognitive impairment in this group is unclear due to the difficulty in administering commonly used assessment tools, which are dependent on functional abilities e.g. drawing and writing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question online survey, that aims to understand current practices on the assessment of cognition and the limitations of currently available tools, was sent via a Research Network Group to British Association of Spinal Cord Injury Specialists (BASCIS) registered clinicians at each of the 12 Spinal Injuries Centers in the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 responses from 11 different SCI centers, with most from clinicians who have worked with SCI patients for over 10 years. 68% felt that there was a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, 15% reported not using tools to screen for cognitive impairment, primarily due to lack of time, lack of guidelines, and physical disabilities affecting the ability to complete tests. When used, the most commonly utilized tools were those that rely on intact hand function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians report a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, currently used tools are not always appropriate, and patients with impaired hand function may be under-represented or undiagnosed. Further work is needed for a more standardized assessment tool to ensure that these patients receive appropriate diagnosis and management, particularly since cognitive impairment in this group can increase care needs and reduce engagement with rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2426313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2426313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最新数据表明,脊髓损伤(SCI)患者出现认知障碍的风险较高。由于常用的评估工具依赖于绘画和书写等功能性能力,难以使用,因此该群体认知障碍的真实发生率尚不清楚:通过研究网络小组向英国脊髓损伤专科医师协会(BASCIS)在英国和爱尔兰 12 个脊髓损伤中心注册的临床医师发送了一份包含 16 个问题的在线调查,旨在了解认知能力评估的现行做法以及现有工具的局限性:来自 11 个不同脊髓损伤中心的 41 份回复,其中大部分来自为脊髓损伤患者工作超过 10 年的临床医生。68%的人认为 SCI 患者的认知障碍发生率较高。然而,15% 的人表示没有使用工具来筛查认知障碍,主要原因是缺乏时间、缺乏指南以及身体残疾影响了完成测试的能力。在使用工具时,最常使用的是那些依赖于完整手部功能的工具:临床医生报告称,在患有 SCI 的患者中,认知障碍的发生率较高。然而,目前使用的工具并不总是合适的,手部功能受损的患者可能没有得到足够的重视或诊断。我们需要进一步研究更标准化的评估工具,以确保这些患者得到适当的诊断和管理,尤其是因为这类患者的认知障碍可能会增加护理需求并降低康复参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey.

Context: Emerging data suggests that patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment. The true incidence of cognitive impairment in this group is unclear due to the difficulty in administering commonly used assessment tools, which are dependent on functional abilities e.g. drawing and writing.

Methods: A 16-question online survey, that aims to understand current practices on the assessment of cognition and the limitations of currently available tools, was sent via a Research Network Group to British Association of Spinal Cord Injury Specialists (BASCIS) registered clinicians at each of the 12 Spinal Injuries Centers in the UK and Ireland.

Results: 41 responses from 11 different SCI centers, with most from clinicians who have worked with SCI patients for over 10 years. 68% felt that there was a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, 15% reported not using tools to screen for cognitive impairment, primarily due to lack of time, lack of guidelines, and physical disabilities affecting the ability to complete tests. When used, the most commonly utilized tools were those that rely on intact hand function.

Conclusions: Clinicians report a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, currently used tools are not always appropriate, and patients with impaired hand function may be under-represented or undiagnosed. Further work is needed for a more standardized assessment tool to ensure that these patients receive appropriate diagnosis and management, particularly since cognitive impairment in this group can increase care needs and reduce engagement with rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1