R A Merchant, Y H Chan, N M W Ling, M Z X Chen, V W T Ho, B L L Wong, Z Lim, S E Ng, V Anantharaman
{"title":"老年病人从急诊科入院接受老年住院治疗与从急诊科入院接受老年住院治疗的比较:成本和住院时间结果。","authors":"R A Merchant, Y H Chan, N M W Ling, M Z X Chen, V W T Ho, B L L Wong, Z Lim, S E Ng, V Anantharaman","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether direct admission to geriatric inpatient care from the emergency department (EMD) was associated with lower length of stay (LOS) and cost compared to patients admitted through an acute medical unit (AMU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-centre cohort study conducted using hospital database on older patients ≥ 75 years discharged from geriatric inpatient service in a tertiary academic centre from March 2021 to September 2021 who were admitted through AMU or direct from EMD.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Traditional AMU run by internists followed by geriatrician led-care compared with geriatrician led-care.</p><p><strong>Measure: </strong>We evaluated the difference in median length of stay (LOS), and cost using quantile regression adjusted for primary discharge diagnoses, hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) and Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 574 older patients, 140 (24.4%) were admitted from AMU. Mean age was 84.0 ± 6.3 years and 83.8% were categorized as high or intermediate frailty risk based on HFRS. 46% of patients admitted through EMD were discharged within three days. After adjusting for primary diagnoses, HFRS, and ACCI, patients admitted through AMU had a longer median LOS of 1.6 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-2.4, p<0.001), higher total cost $1386.0 (95% CI 733-2038, p<0.001), laboratory cost $226.0 (95% CI 131-322, p<0.001), medication cost $65.0 (95% CI 15-115, p<0.010), physiotherapy cost $45.0 (95% CI 16-75, p=0.002) and occupational therapy cost $35.0 (95% CI 12-58, p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults admitted through AMU had significantly longer median LOS, higher total cost, physiotherapy and occupational therapy costs, medication, and laboratory costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"507-513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Admission of Older Patients to Geriatric Inpatient Care from the Emergency Department Compared with Admission through Acute Medical Unit: Cost and Length of Stay Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"R A Merchant, Y H Chan, N M W Ling, M Z X Chen, V W T Ho, B L L Wong, Z Lim, S E Ng, V Anantharaman\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2024.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether direct admission to geriatric inpatient care from the emergency department (EMD) was associated with lower length of stay (LOS) and cost compared to patients admitted through an acute medical unit (AMU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-centre cohort study conducted using hospital database on older patients ≥ 75 years discharged from geriatric inpatient service in a tertiary academic centre from March 2021 to September 2021 who were admitted through AMU or direct from EMD.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Traditional AMU run by internists followed by geriatrician led-care compared with geriatrician led-care.</p><p><strong>Measure: </strong>We evaluated the difference in median length of stay (LOS), and cost using quantile regression adjusted for primary discharge diagnoses, hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) and Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 574 older patients, 140 (24.4%) were admitted from AMU. Mean age was 84.0 ± 6.3 years and 83.8% were categorized as high or intermediate frailty risk based on HFRS. 46% of patients admitted through EMD were discharged within three days. After adjusting for primary diagnoses, HFRS, and ACCI, patients admitted through AMU had a longer median LOS of 1.6 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-2.4, p<0.001), higher total cost $1386.0 (95% CI 733-2038, p<0.001), laboratory cost $226.0 (95% CI 131-322, p<0.001), medication cost $65.0 (95% CI 15-115, p<0.010), physiotherapy cost $45.0 (95% CI 16-75, p=0.002) and occupational therapy cost $35.0 (95% CI 12-58, p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults admitted through AMU had significantly longer median LOS, higher total cost, physiotherapy and occupational therapy costs, medication, and laboratory costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"507-513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Admission of Older Patients to Geriatric Inpatient Care from the Emergency Department Compared with Admission through Acute Medical Unit: Cost and Length of Stay Outcomes.
Objective: To investigate whether direct admission to geriatric inpatient care from the emergency department (EMD) was associated with lower length of stay (LOS) and cost compared to patients admitted through an acute medical unit (AMU).
Methods: Retrospective single-centre cohort study conducted using hospital database on older patients ≥ 75 years discharged from geriatric inpatient service in a tertiary academic centre from March 2021 to September 2021 who were admitted through AMU or direct from EMD.
Intervention: Traditional AMU run by internists followed by geriatrician led-care compared with geriatrician led-care.
Measure: We evaluated the difference in median length of stay (LOS), and cost using quantile regression adjusted for primary discharge diagnoses, hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) and Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI).
Results: Among 574 older patients, 140 (24.4%) were admitted from AMU. Mean age was 84.0 ± 6.3 years and 83.8% were categorized as high or intermediate frailty risk based on HFRS. 46% of patients admitted through EMD were discharged within three days. After adjusting for primary diagnoses, HFRS, and ACCI, patients admitted through AMU had a longer median LOS of 1.6 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-2.4, p<0.001), higher total cost $1386.0 (95% CI 733-2038, p<0.001), laboratory cost $226.0 (95% CI 131-322, p<0.001), medication cost $65.0 (95% CI 15-115, p<0.010), physiotherapy cost $45.0 (95% CI 16-75, p=0.002) and occupational therapy cost $35.0 (95% CI 12-58, p=0.003).
Conclusion: Older adults admitted through AMU had significantly longer median LOS, higher total cost, physiotherapy and occupational therapy costs, medication, and laboratory costs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons. The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).