针对患有多种疾病的老年人的多成分干预中的运动模式:系统回顾与叙述综述》。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Frailty & Aging Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2024.28
F Forsyth, C L Soh, N Elks, H Lin, K Bailey, S Rowbotham, J Mant, P Hartley, C Deaton
{"title":"针对患有多种疾病的老年人的多成分干预中的运动模式:系统回顾与叙述综述》。","authors":"F Forsyth, C L Soh, N Elks, H Lin, K Bailey, S Rowbotham, J Mant, P Hartley, C Deaton","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is efficacious in older adults, including those with multi-morbidity. However, the optimum mode is not known and there are conflicting findings as regards the types of exercises to recommend. It is postulated that multi-component exercise interventions better meet the needs of older adults who experience multi-morbidity as they more holistically address the range of functional problems they may experience. To date, no review has explored and described in detail what multi-component exercise interventions have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the number and types of exercises included within multi-component exercise interventions that have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity. Secondary objectives were to explore the rationale for selecting particular exercise components within the intervention design and to describe the characteristics of the exercise program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Database searches yielded 51,001 articles; following screening 138 unique interventions were retained for analysis. Across studies, 22 different multi-component combinations were identified, and there was marked variation in frequency, intensity and duration. Few studies describe characteristics that are in line with the preferences or needs of older adults with multi-morbidity. Exercise design decisions were most frequently judged to be based on practitioner intuition/local practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity within multi-component exercise interventions; which has significant implications for meta-analysis of effects. Interventions do not frequently appear to consider the abilities or needs of those with multi-morbidity, nor do they seem to be attuned to the participation barriers they experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"341-348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise Modalities in Multi-Component Interventions for Older adults with Multi-Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"F Forsyth, C L Soh, N Elks, H Lin, K Bailey, S Rowbotham, J Mant, P Hartley, C Deaton\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2024.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is efficacious in older adults, including those with multi-morbidity. However, the optimum mode is not known and there are conflicting findings as regards the types of exercises to recommend. It is postulated that multi-component exercise interventions better meet the needs of older adults who experience multi-morbidity as they more holistically address the range of functional problems they may experience. To date, no review has explored and described in detail what multi-component exercise interventions have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the number and types of exercises included within multi-component exercise interventions that have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity. Secondary objectives were to explore the rationale for selecting particular exercise components within the intervention design and to describe the characteristics of the exercise program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Database searches yielded 51,001 articles; following screening 138 unique interventions were retained for analysis. Across studies, 22 different multi-component combinations were identified, and there was marked variation in frequency, intensity and duration. Few studies describe characteristics that are in line with the preferences or needs of older adults with multi-morbidity. Exercise design decisions were most frequently judged to be based on practitioner intuition/local practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity within multi-component exercise interventions; which has significant implications for meta-analysis of effects. Interventions do not frequently appear to consider the abilities or needs of those with multi-morbidity, nor do they seem to be attuned to the participation barriers they experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"341-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动对老年人,包括患有多种疾病的老年人具有疗效。然而,最佳运动模式尚不清楚,在推荐哪种类型的运动方面也有相互矛盾的研究结果。据推测,多成分运动干预能更好地满足患有多种疾病的老年人的需求,因为它们能更全面地解决他们可能遇到的一系列功能问题。迄今为止,还没有一篇综述详细探讨和描述在患有多种疾病的老年人中测试过哪些多成分运动干预措施:目的:探讨已在患有多种疾病的老年人中测试过的多组分运动干预措施中包含的运动数量和类型。次要目标:探讨在干预设计中选择特定运动成分的理由,并描述运动项目的特点:设计:系统综述和叙述性综合:在数据库中搜索到 51,001 篇文章;经过筛选,138 项独特的干预措施被保留下来进行分析。在所有研究中,发现了 22 种不同的多成分组合,并且在频率、强度和持续时间方面存在明显差异。很少有研究描述了符合患有多种疾病的老年人偏好或需求的特征。运动设计决策最常被认为是基于从业者的直觉/当地实践:结论:多组分运动干预中存在大量异质性;这对效果的荟萃分析具有重要影响。干预措施似乎并没有经常考虑到多重疾病患者的能力或需求,也没有考虑到他们在参与过程中遇到的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exercise Modalities in Multi-Component Interventions for Older adults with Multi-Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Background: Exercise is efficacious in older adults, including those with multi-morbidity. However, the optimum mode is not known and there are conflicting findings as regards the types of exercises to recommend. It is postulated that multi-component exercise interventions better meet the needs of older adults who experience multi-morbidity as they more holistically address the range of functional problems they may experience. To date, no review has explored and described in detail what multi-component exercise interventions have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity.

Objectives: To explore the number and types of exercises included within multi-component exercise interventions that have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity. Secondary objectives were to explore the rationale for selecting particular exercise components within the intervention design and to describe the characteristics of the exercise program.

Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Results: Database searches yielded 51,001 articles; following screening 138 unique interventions were retained for analysis. Across studies, 22 different multi-component combinations were identified, and there was marked variation in frequency, intensity and duration. Few studies describe characteristics that are in line with the preferences or needs of older adults with multi-morbidity. Exercise design decisions were most frequently judged to be based on practitioner intuition/local practice.

Conclusion: There is substantial heterogeneity within multi-component exercise interventions; which has significant implications for meta-analysis of effects. Interventions do not frequently appear to consider the abilities or needs of those with multi-morbidity, nor do they seem to be attuned to the participation barriers they experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
期刊最新文献
Frailty-Related Factors among Women Living with and without HIV Aged 40 Years and Older. The Women's Interagency HIV Study. Letter to the Editor: The French Model of Senior Housing to Tackle Housing Inequalities. Letter to the the Editor: The WHO ICOPE Program to Monitor Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults with Cancer. Relationship between Body Mass Index and Sarcopenia with Oral Function Decline in Older Japanese Patients Who Regularly Attend a General Dental Clinic. Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Self-Perceived Health: Findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1