J Fletcher, N Reid, R E Hubbard, R Berry, M Weston, E Walpole, R Kimberley, D A Thaker, R Ladwa
{"title":"预测老年癌症患者治疗结果和不良事件的是虚弱指数而非年龄。","authors":"J Fletcher, N Reid, R E Hubbard, R Berry, M Weston, E Walpole, R Kimberley, D A Thaker, R Ladwa","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is an indicator of individual vulnerability and differentiates health status among people of the same chronological age.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether baseline frailty index (FI) was associated with systemic anticancer therapy treatment outcomes in older adults with solid cancers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Major metropolitan outpatient oncology service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged over 65 years with a solid malignancy who had been referred for consideration of systemic therapy, and had completed a baseline frailty assessment between January 2019 and July 2021.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Frailty had been prospectively assessed with a 58-item FI derived from a geriatric oncology nurse assessment prior to initial oncologist appointments. Primary outcome was treatment completion, and secondary outcomes included incidence of high-grade treatment-related toxicity or unplanned hospital admissions, and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to test the association between treatment outcomes and baseline FI. Co-variates included age, sex, performance status, treatment intent, and stage. Kaplan-Meier and cox proportional hazard analysis were conducted for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median FI (IQR) was 0.24 (0.15-0.31) and 43% were frail (FI>0.25). FI was positively correlated with ECOG, however 28% of ECOG 0-1 were frail. In multivariable regression analyses, each 0.10 increase in FI was associated with an increased likelihood of not completing or not receiving treatment (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.84; p=.04), treatment-related toxicity (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.23; p<.01) and unplanned hospital admissions (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.16-2.25; p<.01). Frail patients had increased mortality (adjusted HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42-5.56; p<.01). Age did not predict treatment completion, toxicities, or survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline FI is a granular measure that can help to identify frailer older patients who are more likely to require tailored therapy and support, and less frail older patients who are more likely to tolerate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"487-494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty Index, Not Age, Predicts Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Events for Older Adults with Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"J Fletcher, N Reid, R E Hubbard, R Berry, M Weston, E Walpole, R Kimberley, D A Thaker, R Ladwa\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2024.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is an indicator of individual vulnerability and differentiates health status among people of the same chronological age.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether baseline frailty index (FI) was associated with systemic anticancer therapy treatment outcomes in older adults with solid cancers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Major metropolitan outpatient oncology service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged over 65 years with a solid malignancy who had been referred for consideration of systemic therapy, and had completed a baseline frailty assessment between January 2019 and July 2021.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Frailty had been prospectively assessed with a 58-item FI derived from a geriatric oncology nurse assessment prior to initial oncologist appointments. Primary outcome was treatment completion, and secondary outcomes included incidence of high-grade treatment-related toxicity or unplanned hospital admissions, and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to test the association between treatment outcomes and baseline FI. Co-variates included age, sex, performance status, treatment intent, and stage. Kaplan-Meier and cox proportional hazard analysis were conducted for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median FI (IQR) was 0.24 (0.15-0.31) and 43% were frail (FI>0.25). FI was positively correlated with ECOG, however 28% of ECOG 0-1 were frail. In multivariable regression analyses, each 0.10 increase in FI was associated with an increased likelihood of not completing or not receiving treatment (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.84; p=.04), treatment-related toxicity (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.23; p<.01) and unplanned hospital admissions (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.16-2.25; p<.01). Frail patients had increased mortality (adjusted HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42-5.56; p<.01). Age did not predict treatment completion, toxicities, or survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline FI is a granular measure that can help to identify frailer older patients who are more likely to require tailored therapy and support, and less frail older patients who are more likely to tolerate treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"487-494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虚弱是个体脆弱性的一个指标,可区分同一年龄段人群的健康状况:本研究旨在确定基线虚弱指数(FI)是否与患有实体瘤的老年人的全身抗癌治疗结果相关:设计:回顾性队列研究:主要城市的肿瘤门诊服务:年龄超过65岁的实体瘤恶性肿瘤患者,他们已被转诊考虑接受系统治疗,并在2019年1月至2021年7月期间完成了基线虚弱评估:在肿瘤专家初次会诊前,通过老年肿瘤科护士评估得出的 58 项 FI 对虚弱程度进行了前瞻性评估。主要结果为治疗完成情况,次要结果包括高级别治疗相关毒性或非计划住院的发生率以及生存结果。我们进行了单变量和多变量回归分析,以检验治疗结果与基线 FI 之间的关联。辅助变量包括年龄、性别、表现状态、治疗意图和分期。生存分析采用卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)和考克斯比例危险分析法:中位 FI(IQR)为 0.24(0.15-0.31),43% 的患者体质虚弱(FI>0.25)。FI与ECOG呈正相关,但ECOG为0-1的患者中有28%体弱。在多变量回归分析中,FI 每增加 0.10,未完成或未接受治疗(OR 1.37,95% CI 1.02-1.84;p=.04)、治疗相关毒性(OR 1.60,95% CI 1.14-2.23;p)的可能性增加:基线FI是一种精细的测量指标,有助于识别更有可能需要定制治疗和支持的体弱老年患者,以及更有可能耐受治疗的体弱老年患者。
Frailty Index, Not Age, Predicts Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Events for Older Adults with Cancer.
Background: Frailty is an indicator of individual vulnerability and differentiates health status among people of the same chronological age.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether baseline frailty index (FI) was associated with systemic anticancer therapy treatment outcomes in older adults with solid cancers.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Major metropolitan outpatient oncology service.
Participants: Adults aged over 65 years with a solid malignancy who had been referred for consideration of systemic therapy, and had completed a baseline frailty assessment between January 2019 and July 2021.
Measurements: Frailty had been prospectively assessed with a 58-item FI derived from a geriatric oncology nurse assessment prior to initial oncologist appointments. Primary outcome was treatment completion, and secondary outcomes included incidence of high-grade treatment-related toxicity or unplanned hospital admissions, and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to test the association between treatment outcomes and baseline FI. Co-variates included age, sex, performance status, treatment intent, and stage. Kaplan-Meier and cox proportional hazard analysis were conducted for survival analysis.
Results: The median FI (IQR) was 0.24 (0.15-0.31) and 43% were frail (FI>0.25). FI was positively correlated with ECOG, however 28% of ECOG 0-1 were frail. In multivariable regression analyses, each 0.10 increase in FI was associated with an increased likelihood of not completing or not receiving treatment (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.84; p=.04), treatment-related toxicity (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.23; p<.01) and unplanned hospital admissions (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.16-2.25; p<.01). Frail patients had increased mortality (adjusted HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42-5.56; p<.01). Age did not predict treatment completion, toxicities, or survival.
Conclusion: Baseline FI is a granular measure that can help to identify frailer older patients who are more likely to require tailored therapy and support, and less frail older patients who are more likely to tolerate treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons. The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).