人工耳蜗植入:利用高分辨率颞骨计算机断层扫描中的一个测量值预测圆窗缝隙可见度。

Laila Telmesani, Mona Al-Ramah, Yassin Abdelsamad, Lena Telmesani
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入:利用高分辨率颞骨计算机断层扫描中的一个测量值预测圆窗缝隙可见度。","authors":"Laila Telmesani, Mona Al-Ramah, Yassin Abdelsamad, Lena Telmesani","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.231199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of a single measurement in temporal bone computed tomography in predicting the round window niche (RWN) visibility during cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 148 patients (165 ears) who had a cochlear implant (CI) from January 2010 to December 2018 at a tertiary CI center. The measurement was done for the angle of the basal turn of the cochlea (ABTC), which we defined as the angle formed by the cochlear basal turn and the cranium mid-sagittal plane, by 2 readers blindly from the axial images of computed tomography. The RWN visibility was classified according to the observation during surgery (through posterior tympanotomy) into full visibility, partial visibility, and invisibility. The measured angle was then correlated to the intra-operative visibility of the RWN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ABTC was 57.48° ± 4.05° (range: 45.0-68.0), and the RWN was found to be fully visible in 85%, partially visible in 11%, and invisible in 4% of the studied ears. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significant discriminating ability in predicting RWN visibility (P <.001) at a threshold ABTC angle of 58.5°. The mean ABTC was 56.71° ± 3.74°, 61.00°, and 63.86° ± 2.67° for fully visible, partially visible, and invisible RWN, respectively. A statistical significant difference was found (P = .0002) when comparing the ABTC in patients with partially visible/invisible RWN (61.80° ± 2.87°) with the fully visible RWN (56.71° ± 3.74°).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Round window niche visibility could be predicted by measuring the ABTC in relation to the cranium's mid-sagittal plane in CT preoperatively. An ABTC bigger than 58.5° could be an indication of poorly visible RWN.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 2","pages":"94-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear Implantation: Predicting Round Window Niche Visibility Using One Measurement in High-Resolution Temporal Bone Computed Tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Laila Telmesani, Mona Al-Ramah, Yassin Abdelsamad, Lena Telmesani\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/iao.2024.231199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of a single measurement in temporal bone computed tomography in predicting the round window niche (RWN) visibility during cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 148 patients (165 ears) who had a cochlear implant (CI) from January 2010 to December 2018 at a tertiary CI center. The measurement was done for the angle of the basal turn of the cochlea (ABTC), which we defined as the angle formed by the cochlear basal turn and the cranium mid-sagittal plane, by 2 readers blindly from the axial images of computed tomography. The RWN visibility was classified according to the observation during surgery (through posterior tympanotomy) into full visibility, partial visibility, and invisibility. The measured angle was then correlated to the intra-operative visibility of the RWN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ABTC was 57.48° ± 4.05° (range: 45.0-68.0), and the RWN was found to be fully visible in 85%, partially visible in 11%, and invisible in 4% of the studied ears. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significant discriminating ability in predicting RWN visibility (P <.001) at a threshold ABTC angle of 58.5°. The mean ABTC was 56.71° ± 3.74°, 61.00°, and 63.86° ± 2.67° for fully visible, partially visible, and invisible RWN, respectively. A statistical significant difference was found (P = .0002) when comparing the ABTC in patients with partially visible/invisible RWN (61.80° ± 2.87°) with the fully visible RWN (56.71° ± 3.74°).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Round window niche visibility could be predicted by measuring the ABTC in relation to the cranium's mid-sagittal plane in CT preoperatively. An ABTC bigger than 58.5° could be an indication of poorly visible RWN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of international advanced otology\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"94-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of international advanced otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估颞骨计算机断层扫描中的单个测量值在预测人工耳蜗植入过程中圆形窗龛(RWN)可见度方面的准确性:目的:评估颞骨计算机断层扫描的单次测量结果在预测人工耳蜗植入过程中圆窗龛(RWN)能见度方面的准确性:一项前瞻性研究针对 2010 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在一家三级人工耳蜗中心植入人工耳蜗(CI)的 148 名患者(165 耳)。测量耳蜗基底转角(ABTC),我们将其定义为耳蜗基底转角与颅骨中矢状面形成的夹角,由两名读片者通过计算机断层扫描的轴向图像进行盲法测量。根据手术中(通过后鼓室切开术)的观察结果,将 RWN 可见度分为完全可见、部分可见和不可见。然后将测得的角度与 RWN 的术中可见度相关联:平均 ABTC 为 57.48°±4.05°(范围:45.0-68.0),发现 85% 的研究耳完全可见 RWN,11% 的研究耳部分可见 RWN,4% 的研究耳不可见 RWN。接收器操作特性分析表明,在预测圆窗龛可见度方面具有显著的鉴别能力(P 结论:圆窗龛可见度可通过接收器操作特性分析预测:术前通过 CT 测量 ABTC 与头颅中矢状面的关系,可以预测圆窗龛的可见度。ABTC 大于 58.5°可能表明圆窗龛可见度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cochlear Implantation: Predicting Round Window Niche Visibility Using One Measurement in High-Resolution Temporal Bone Computed Tomography.

Background: To evaluate the accuracy of a single measurement in temporal bone computed tomography in predicting the round window niche (RWN) visibility during cochlear implantation.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 148 patients (165 ears) who had a cochlear implant (CI) from January 2010 to December 2018 at a tertiary CI center. The measurement was done for the angle of the basal turn of the cochlea (ABTC), which we defined as the angle formed by the cochlear basal turn and the cranium mid-sagittal plane, by 2 readers blindly from the axial images of computed tomography. The RWN visibility was classified according to the observation during surgery (through posterior tympanotomy) into full visibility, partial visibility, and invisibility. The measured angle was then correlated to the intra-operative visibility of the RWN.

Results: The average ABTC was 57.48° ± 4.05° (range: 45.0-68.0), and the RWN was found to be fully visible in 85%, partially visible in 11%, and invisible in 4% of the studied ears. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significant discriminating ability in predicting RWN visibility (P <.001) at a threshold ABTC angle of 58.5°. The mean ABTC was 56.71° ± 3.74°, 61.00°, and 63.86° ± 2.67° for fully visible, partially visible, and invisible RWN, respectively. A statistical significant difference was found (P = .0002) when comparing the ABTC in patients with partially visible/invisible RWN (61.80° ± 2.87°) with the fully visible RWN (56.71° ± 3.74°).

Conclusion: Round window niche visibility could be predicted by measuring the ABTC in relation to the cranium's mid-sagittal plane in CT preoperatively. An ABTC bigger than 58.5° could be an indication of poorly visible RWN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Ebselen in Facial Nerve Crush Injury: An Experimental Study. Thiol-Disulfide Homeostasis in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Rats. Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Pediatric Bilateral Congenital Cholesteatoma: A Report of Two Cases. Unraveling Cochlear Dynamics: The Effect of Clicks, Tone Burst Frequencies, Polarity, and Stimulus Rates on Cochlear Microphonics in Individuals with Normal Hearing. A Strategy for Bone Conduction Device Adoption: Study of Non-Usage Challenges, Skin-Deep Insights and Patient Satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1