利用特征测量 XAI 方法生成的解释。

Cătălin-Mihai Pesecan, Lăcrămioara Stoicu-Tivadar
{"title":"利用特征测量 XAI 方法生成的解释。","authors":"Cătălin-Mihai Pesecan, Lăcrămioara Stoicu-Tivadar","doi":"10.3233/SHTI241102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing number of explainability methods began to emerge as a response for the black-box methods used to make decisions that could not be easily explained. This created the need for a better evaluation for these methods. In this paper we propose a new method for evaluation based on features. The main advantage of applying the proposed method to CNNs explanations are: a fully automated way to measure the quality of an explanation and the fact that the score uses the same information as the CNN, in this way being able to offer a measure of the quality of explanation that can be obtained automatically, ensuring that the human bias will not be present in the measurement of the explanation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"321 ","pages":"250-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Explanations Generated by XAI Methods Using Features.\",\"authors\":\"Cătălin-Mihai Pesecan, Lăcrămioara Stoicu-Tivadar\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI241102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An increasing number of explainability methods began to emerge as a response for the black-box methods used to make decisions that could not be easily explained. This created the need for a better evaluation for these methods. In this paper we propose a new method for evaluation based on features. The main advantage of applying the proposed method to CNNs explanations are: a fully automated way to measure the quality of an explanation and the fact that the score uses the same information as the CNN, in this way being able to offer a measure of the quality of explanation that can be obtained automatically, ensuring that the human bias will not be present in the measurement of the explanation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"321 \",\"pages\":\"250-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI241102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI241102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的可解释性方法开始出现,作为对黑箱方法的回应,黑箱方法用于做出不易解释的决策。这就需要对这些方法进行更好的评估。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于特征的新评估方法。将所提出的方法应用于 CNN 解释的主要优势在于:采用完全自动化的方式来衡量解释的质量,而且评分使用与 CNN 相同的信息,从而能够提供一种可自动获得的解释质量衡量方法,确保在衡量解释时不会出现人为偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement of Explanations Generated by XAI Methods Using Features.

An increasing number of explainability methods began to emerge as a response for the black-box methods used to make decisions that could not be easily explained. This created the need for a better evaluation for these methods. In this paper we propose a new method for evaluation based on features. The main advantage of applying the proposed method to CNNs explanations are: a fully automated way to measure the quality of an explanation and the fact that the score uses the same information as the CNN, in this way being able to offer a measure of the quality of explanation that can be obtained automatically, ensuring that the human bias will not be present in the measurement of the explanation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROSurvival: A Technical Case Report on Creating and Publishing a Dataset for Federated Learning on Survival Prediction of Prostate Cancer Patients. Survival Stacking Ensemble Model for Lung Cancer Risk Prediction. The Creation of Intensional Medication Lists Using the NHS Dictionary of Medicines and Devices. Scaling up Environmental Governance in Precision Forestry. Securing a Generative AI-Powered Healthcare Chatbot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1