利用血浆蛋白质组学、传统风险因素和多基因评分预测中国和欧洲成年人患缺血性心脏病的风险

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s10654-024-01168-8
Mohsen Mazidi, Neil Wright, Pang Yao, Christiana Kartsonaki, Iona Y. Millwood, Hannah Fry, Saredo Said, Alfred Pozarickij, Pei Pei, Yiping Chen, Baihan Wang, Daniel Avery, Huaidong Du, Dan Valle Schmidt, Ling Yang, Jun Lv, Canqing Yu, DianJianYi Sun, Junshi Chen, Michael Hill, Richard Peto, Rory Collins, Derrick A. Bennett, Robin G. Walters, Liming Li, Robert Clarke, Zhengming Chen
{"title":"利用血浆蛋白质组学、传统风险因素和多基因评分预测中国和欧洲成年人患缺血性心脏病的风险","authors":"Mohsen Mazidi, Neil Wright, Pang Yao, Christiana Kartsonaki, Iona Y. Millwood, Hannah Fry, Saredo Said, Alfred Pozarickij, Pei Pei, Yiping Chen, Baihan Wang, Daniel Avery, Huaidong Du, Dan Valle Schmidt, Ling Yang, Jun Lv, Canqing Yu, DianJianYi Sun, Junshi Chen, Michael Hill, Richard Peto, Rory Collins, Derrick A. Bennett, Robin G. Walters, Liming Li, Robert Clarke, Zhengming Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10654-024-01168-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plasma proteomics could enhance risk prediction for multiple diseases beyond conventional risk factors or polygenic scores (PS). To assess utility of proteomics for risk prediction of ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and European populations. A nested case-cohort study measured plasma levels of 2923 proteins using Olink Explore panel in ~ 4000 Chinese adults (1976 incident IHD cases and 2001 sub-cohort controls). We used conventional and machine learning (Boruta) methods to develop proteomics-based prediction models of IHD, with discrimination assessed using area under the curve (AUC), C-statistics and net reclassification index (NRI). These were compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and in 37,187 Europeans. Overall, 446 proteins were associated with IHD (false discovery rate &lt; 0.05) in Chinese after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Proteomic risk models alone yielded higher C-statistics for IHD than conventional risk factors or PS (0.855 [95%CI 0.841–0.868] vs. 0.845 [0.829–0.860] vs 0.553 [0.528–0.578], respectively). Addition of 446 proteins to PS improved C-statistics to 0.857 (0.843–0.871) and NRI by 109.1%; and addition to conventional risk factors improved C-statistics to 0.868 (0.854–0.882) and NRI by 86.9%. Boruta analysis identified 30 proteins accounting for ~ 90% of improvement in NRI for IHD conferred by all 2923 proteins. Similar proteomic panels yielded comparable improvements in risk prediction of IHD in Europeans. Plasma proteomics improved risk prediction of IHD beyond conventional risk factors and PS and could enhance precision medicine approaches for primary prevention of IHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk prediction of ischemic heart disease using plasma proteomics, conventional risk factors and polygenic scores in Chinese and European adults\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Mazidi, Neil Wright, Pang Yao, Christiana Kartsonaki, Iona Y. Millwood, Hannah Fry, Saredo Said, Alfred Pozarickij, Pei Pei, Yiping Chen, Baihan Wang, Daniel Avery, Huaidong Du, Dan Valle Schmidt, Ling Yang, Jun Lv, Canqing Yu, DianJianYi Sun, Junshi Chen, Michael Hill, Richard Peto, Rory Collins, Derrick A. Bennett, Robin G. Walters, Liming Li, Robert Clarke, Zhengming Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10654-024-01168-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plasma proteomics could enhance risk prediction for multiple diseases beyond conventional risk factors or polygenic scores (PS). To assess utility of proteomics for risk prediction of ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and European populations. A nested case-cohort study measured plasma levels of 2923 proteins using Olink Explore panel in ~ 4000 Chinese adults (1976 incident IHD cases and 2001 sub-cohort controls). We used conventional and machine learning (Boruta) methods to develop proteomics-based prediction models of IHD, with discrimination assessed using area under the curve (AUC), C-statistics and net reclassification index (NRI). These were compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and in 37,187 Europeans. Overall, 446 proteins were associated with IHD (false discovery rate &lt; 0.05) in Chinese after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Proteomic risk models alone yielded higher C-statistics for IHD than conventional risk factors or PS (0.855 [95%CI 0.841–0.868] vs. 0.845 [0.829–0.860] vs 0.553 [0.528–0.578], respectively). Addition of 446 proteins to PS improved C-statistics to 0.857 (0.843–0.871) and NRI by 109.1%; and addition to conventional risk factors improved C-statistics to 0.868 (0.854–0.882) and NRI by 86.9%. Boruta analysis identified 30 proteins accounting for ~ 90% of improvement in NRI for IHD conferred by all 2923 proteins. Similar proteomic panels yielded comparable improvements in risk prediction of IHD in Europeans. Plasma proteomics improved risk prediction of IHD beyond conventional risk factors and PS and could enhance precision medicine approaches for primary prevention of IHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01168-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01168-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血浆蛋白质组学可以超越传统的风险因素或多基因评分(PS),提高多种疾病的风险预测能力。在中国和欧洲人群中,与传统风险因素和多基因评分相比,评估蛋白质组学在缺血性心脏病(IHD)风险预测中的效用。一项巢式病例队列研究使用 Olink Explore 面板测量了约 4000 名中国成年人(1976 例 IHD 病例和 2001 例亚队列对照)的 2923 种蛋白质的血浆水平。我们使用传统方法和机器学习(Boruta)方法开发了基于蛋白质组学的 IHD 预测模型,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)、C 统计量和净重分类指数(NRI)评估了区分度。这些模型与中国人和 37,187 名欧洲人的传统风险因素和 PS 进行了比较。总体而言,在调整了常规心血管疾病风险因素后,中国人中有 446 种蛋白质与高血压相关(误发现率为 0.05)。与传统的风险因素或PS相比,单独的蛋白质组风险模型得出的IHD C统计量更高(分别为0.855 [95%CI 0.841-0.868] vs. 0.845 [0.829-0.860] vs. 0.553 [0.528-0.578])。在 PS 中加入 446 种蛋白质后,C 统计量提高到 0.857(0.843-0.871),NRI 提高了 109.1%;在传统风险因素中加入 446 种蛋白质后,C 统计量提高到 0.868(0.854-0.882),NRI 提高了 86.9%。Boruta分析确定了30种蛋白质,它们占所有2923种蛋白质改善IHD NRI的90%左右。类似的蛋白质组对欧洲人的 IHD 风险预测也有类似的改善。血浆蛋白质组学超越了传统的风险因素和PS,提高了对IHD的风险预测能力,可加强IHD一级预防的精准医疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk prediction of ischemic heart disease using plasma proteomics, conventional risk factors and polygenic scores in Chinese and European adults

Plasma proteomics could enhance risk prediction for multiple diseases beyond conventional risk factors or polygenic scores (PS). To assess utility of proteomics for risk prediction of ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and European populations. A nested case-cohort study measured plasma levels of 2923 proteins using Olink Explore panel in ~ 4000 Chinese adults (1976 incident IHD cases and 2001 sub-cohort controls). We used conventional and machine learning (Boruta) methods to develop proteomics-based prediction models of IHD, with discrimination assessed using area under the curve (AUC), C-statistics and net reclassification index (NRI). These were compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and in 37,187 Europeans. Overall, 446 proteins were associated with IHD (false discovery rate < 0.05) in Chinese after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Proteomic risk models alone yielded higher C-statistics for IHD than conventional risk factors or PS (0.855 [95%CI 0.841–0.868] vs. 0.845 [0.829–0.860] vs 0.553 [0.528–0.578], respectively). Addition of 446 proteins to PS improved C-statistics to 0.857 (0.843–0.871) and NRI by 109.1%; and addition to conventional risk factors improved C-statistics to 0.868 (0.854–0.882) and NRI by 86.9%. Boruta analysis identified 30 proteins accounting for ~ 90% of improvement in NRI for IHD conferred by all 2923 proteins. Similar proteomic panels yielded comparable improvements in risk prediction of IHD in Europeans. Plasma proteomics improved risk prediction of IHD beyond conventional risk factors and PS and could enhance precision medicine approaches for primary prevention of IHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Epidemiology
European Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.
期刊最新文献
Updated findings on temporal variation in radiation-effects on cancer mortality in an international cohort of nuclear workers (INWORKS) Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in twins: novel insight into management at preterm versus term gestations Risk prediction of ischemic heart disease using plasma proteomics, conventional risk factors and polygenic scores in Chinese and European adults Differential risk of healthcare workers versus the general population during outbreak, war and pandemic crises The Jiangsu Biobank for the Prevention and Control of Diabetes (JBPCD) in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1