孟鲁司特的神经精神副作用:是时候改变处方做法了吗?

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Thorax Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222643
David Lo, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"孟鲁司特的神经精神副作用:是时候改变处方做法了吗?","authors":"David Lo, Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1998, montelukast has been licensed for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma in people aged over 6 months. In children in particular, montelukast was welcomed as a steroid-sparing alternative to traditional asthma-preventer drugs, which could be taken just once daily, and which did not require the use of an inhaler. Although recent systematic reviews have shown regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to be more effective than montelukast in controlling asthma symptoms, some children do demonstrate preferential response to montelukast.1 2 Consequently, current asthma guidelines still recommend montelukast as an optional alternative to ICS for mild-to-moderate asthma as monotherapy in children.3 While several studies and even prescribing information cite a wide range of potential neuropsychiatric side effects, the frequency of occurrence and exact nature of these side effects are not well defined and unfortunately not always well understood or recognised by healthcare professionals.4 In 2019 and then again in 2024, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency issued warnings and advice drawing attention to these problems.5 6 Similarly, in the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a ‘black box warning’ for montelukast in 2020, drawing attention to documented mental and behavioural health risks associated with the use of the drug.7 More recently in 2024, the New York State district attorney called on the FDA to take urgent action to protect children from the risks of montelukast, including writing to …","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychiatric side effects of montelukast: time to change prescribing practice?\",\"authors\":\"David Lo, Jennifer K Quint\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2024-222643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 1998, montelukast has been licensed for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma in people aged over 6 months. In children in particular, montelukast was welcomed as a steroid-sparing alternative to traditional asthma-preventer drugs, which could be taken just once daily, and which did not require the use of an inhaler. Although recent systematic reviews have shown regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to be more effective than montelukast in controlling asthma symptoms, some children do demonstrate preferential response to montelukast.1 2 Consequently, current asthma guidelines still recommend montelukast as an optional alternative to ICS for mild-to-moderate asthma as monotherapy in children.3 While several studies and even prescribing information cite a wide range of potential neuropsychiatric side effects, the frequency of occurrence and exact nature of these side effects are not well defined and unfortunately not always well understood or recognised by healthcare professionals.4 In 2019 and then again in 2024, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency issued warnings and advice drawing attention to these problems.5 6 Similarly, in the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a ‘black box warning’ for montelukast in 2020, drawing attention to documented mental and behavioural health risks associated with the use of the drug.7 More recently in 2024, the New York State district attorney called on the FDA to take urgent action to protect children from the risks of montelukast, including writing to …\",\"PeriodicalId\":23284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thorax\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222643\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 1998 年起,孟鲁司特被许可用于治疗 6 个月以上的季节性过敏性鼻炎和哮喘。特别是在儿童中,孟鲁司特作为传统哮喘预防药物的一种节省类固醇的替代药物受到欢迎,它每天只需服用一次,而且不需要使用吸入器。尽管最近的系统综述显示,在控制哮喘症状方面,常规吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)比孟鲁司特更有效,但一些儿童确实对孟鲁司特有优先反应。虽然一些研究甚至处方信息都列举了多种潜在的神经精神副作用,但这些副作用的发生频率和确切性质并没有得到很好的界定,而且不幸的是,医护人员并不总是能很好地理解或认识到这些副作用。5 6 同样,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于 2020 年对孟鲁司特发布了 "黑框警告",提醒人们注意与使用该药物相关的精神和行为健康风险。7 最近,纽约州地方检察官于 2024 年呼吁 FDA 采取紧急行动,保护儿童免受孟鲁司特的风险,包括致函...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuropsychiatric side effects of montelukast: time to change prescribing practice?
Since 1998, montelukast has been licensed for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma in people aged over 6 months. In children in particular, montelukast was welcomed as a steroid-sparing alternative to traditional asthma-preventer drugs, which could be taken just once daily, and which did not require the use of an inhaler. Although recent systematic reviews have shown regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to be more effective than montelukast in controlling asthma symptoms, some children do demonstrate preferential response to montelukast.1 2 Consequently, current asthma guidelines still recommend montelukast as an optional alternative to ICS for mild-to-moderate asthma as monotherapy in children.3 While several studies and even prescribing information cite a wide range of potential neuropsychiatric side effects, the frequency of occurrence and exact nature of these side effects are not well defined and unfortunately not always well understood or recognised by healthcare professionals.4 In 2019 and then again in 2024, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency issued warnings and advice drawing attention to these problems.5 6 Similarly, in the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a ‘black box warning’ for montelukast in 2020, drawing attention to documented mental and behavioural health risks associated with the use of the drug.7 More recently in 2024, the New York State district attorney called on the FDA to take urgent action to protect children from the risks of montelukast, including writing to …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Optimising bronchoalveolar lavage: lessons from alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency Quantitative BAL: a suitable method for the assessment of epithelial lining fluid in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency? Neuropsychiatric side effects of montelukast: time to change prescribing practice? Neuropsychiatric diagnoses after montelukast initiation in paediatric patients with asthma A structural and metabolic framework for classifying pre-clinical tuberculosis infection phenotypes using 18F-FDG PET-CT: a prospective cohort analysis following M. tuberculosis exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1