根据 2021 年定义的原发性和继发性浆细胞白血病患者的临床特征和生存结果:单中心回顾性研究

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.014
Khalid Shalaby, Farhan Azad, Sarah Parker, Chong Wang, Han Yu, Kristopher Attwood, Jens Hillengass
{"title":"根据 2021 年定义的原发性和继发性浆细胞白血病患者的临床特征和生存结果:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Khalid Shalaby, Farhan Azad, Sarah Parker, Chong Wang, Han Yu, Kristopher Attwood, Jens Hillengass","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare malignancy with poor overall survival (OS). Recently, its diagnostic criteria were revised by lowering the threshold of circulating plasma cells from ≥ 20% to ≥ 5%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2010 and 2024, patients with primary PCL (pPCL) and secondary PCL (sPCL) were identified at a tertiary center. We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics, treatment, and survival in months (m).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30 patients with pPCL and 29 patients with sPCL. The median time to sPCL in patients who received Daratumumab (Dara)-containing regimens for multiple myeloma was 46.8m compared with 12.3m in patients who did not (P=0.007). Of the whole cohort, 51.9% received an induction regimen with novel agents without chemotherapy. Of the evaluable patients with pPCL and sPCL, 82.1% (23/28) and 64.7% (11/17) achieved partial response or better respectively. Median progression free survival was significantly worse in patients with sPCL than pPCL (2.2 vs. 38.3 months; HR 0.16; 95% CI (0.07-0.35), P < .001). Median OS was also worse in patients with sPCL compared with pPCL (3.1 months vs. NR [not reached]; HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.04-0.23, P < .001). The median post-SCT survival for patients with pPCL was NR compared with 6.7m for patients with sPCL (HR 0.17; 95% CI (0.03-0.83), P = .03). Dara-refractory status was associated with worse OS (HR 5.63; 95% CI (2.75-11.51), P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes of pPCL are improving but remain dismal for sPCL. We explored the role of novel agents, especially Dara, in the treatment of PCL. More prospective trials are needed to improve its outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Patients With Primary and Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia According to the 2021 Definition: A Single Center Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Khalid Shalaby, Farhan Azad, Sarah Parker, Chong Wang, Han Yu, Kristopher Attwood, Jens Hillengass\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare malignancy with poor overall survival (OS). Recently, its diagnostic criteria were revised by lowering the threshold of circulating plasma cells from ≥ 20% to ≥ 5%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2010 and 2024, patients with primary PCL (pPCL) and secondary PCL (sPCL) were identified at a tertiary center. We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics, treatment, and survival in months (m).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30 patients with pPCL and 29 patients with sPCL. The median time to sPCL in patients who received Daratumumab (Dara)-containing regimens for multiple myeloma was 46.8m compared with 12.3m in patients who did not (P=0.007). Of the whole cohort, 51.9% received an induction regimen with novel agents without chemotherapy. Of the evaluable patients with pPCL and sPCL, 82.1% (23/28) and 64.7% (11/17) achieved partial response or better respectively. Median progression free survival was significantly worse in patients with sPCL than pPCL (2.2 vs. 38.3 months; HR 0.16; 95% CI (0.07-0.35), P < .001). Median OS was also worse in patients with sPCL compared with pPCL (3.1 months vs. NR [not reached]; HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.04-0.23, P < .001). The median post-SCT survival for patients with pPCL was NR compared with 6.7m for patients with sPCL (HR 0.17; 95% CI (0.03-0.83), P = .03). Dara-refractory status was associated with worse OS (HR 5.63; 95% CI (2.75-11.51), P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes of pPCL are improving but remain dismal for sPCL. We explored the role of novel agents, especially Dara, in the treatment of PCL. More prospective trials are needed to improve its outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介浆细胞白血病(PCL)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,总生存率(OS)很低。最近,对其诊断标准进行了修订,将循环浆细胞的阈值从≥20%降至≥5%:方法:2010年至2024年间,我们在一家三级医疗中心发现了原发性PCL(pPCL)和继发性PCL(sPCL)患者。我们对基线特征、治疗和以月(m)为单位的存活率进行了回顾性分析:结果:我们发现了 30 名 pPCL 患者和 29 名 sPCL 患者。接受含达拉单抗(Dara)方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的患者中位sPCL时间为46.8个月,而未接受该方案治疗的患者中位sPCL时间为12.3个月(P=0.007)。在整个队列中,51.9%的患者接受了使用新型药物的诱导方案,而没有接受化疗。在可评估的pPCL和sPCL患者中,分别有82.1%(23/28)和64.7%(11/17)的患者获得了部分反应或更好的反应。sPCL患者的中位无进展生存期明显低于pPCL患者(2.2个月 vs. 38.3个月;HR 0.16;95% CI (0.07-0.35),P < .001)。sPCL患者的中位OS也比pPCL患者差(3.1个月 vs. NR [未达到];HR 0.09;95%CI 0.04-0.23,P < .001)。pPCL患者的截肢后生存期中位数为NR,而sPCL患者为6.7个月(HR 0.17;95% CI (0.03-0.83),P = .03)。达拉难治状态与较差的OS相关(HR 5.63;95% CI (2.75-11.51),P < .0001):结论:pPCL的预后正在改善,但sPCL的预后仍然不容乐观。我们探讨了新型药物,尤其是 Dara 在治疗 PCL 中的作用。需要进行更多的前瞻性试验来改善疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Patients With Primary and Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia According to the 2021 Definition: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare malignancy with poor overall survival (OS). Recently, its diagnostic criteria were revised by lowering the threshold of circulating plasma cells from ≥ 20% to ≥ 5%.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2024, patients with primary PCL (pPCL) and secondary PCL (sPCL) were identified at a tertiary center. We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics, treatment, and survival in months (m).

Results: We identified 30 patients with pPCL and 29 patients with sPCL. The median time to sPCL in patients who received Daratumumab (Dara)-containing regimens for multiple myeloma was 46.8m compared with 12.3m in patients who did not (P=0.007). Of the whole cohort, 51.9% received an induction regimen with novel agents without chemotherapy. Of the evaluable patients with pPCL and sPCL, 82.1% (23/28) and 64.7% (11/17) achieved partial response or better respectively. Median progression free survival was significantly worse in patients with sPCL than pPCL (2.2 vs. 38.3 months; HR 0.16; 95% CI (0.07-0.35), P < .001). Median OS was also worse in patients with sPCL compared with pPCL (3.1 months vs. NR [not reached]; HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.04-0.23, P < .001). The median post-SCT survival for patients with pPCL was NR compared with 6.7m for patients with sPCL (HR 0.17; 95% CI (0.03-0.83), P = .03). Dara-refractory status was associated with worse OS (HR 5.63; 95% CI (2.75-11.51), P < .0001).

Conclusion: Outcomes of pPCL are improving but remain dismal for sPCL. We explored the role of novel agents, especially Dara, in the treatment of PCL. More prospective trials are needed to improve its outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Patients With Primary and Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia According to the 2021 Definition: A Single Center Retrospective Study. Incidence, Risk Factors and Early Prediction of Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity by Global Longitudinal Strain and Cardiac Biomarkers in Indian Patients With Lymphoma: A Prospective Observational Study. Expert Opinion on Managing Adverse Reactions Associated With Acalabrutinib Therapy: A Delphi Consensus From France. First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Recommendations From a Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1