住院医生与主治医生进行急诊哈特曼切除术的围手术期结果比较。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084
Lior Orbach, Shiran Gabay, Tal Montekio, Ariel S Chai, Yehuda Kariv, Meir Zemel, Adam Abu-Abeid, Guy Lahat, Jonathan B Yuval
{"title":"住院医生与主治医生进行急诊哈特曼切除术的围手术期结果比较。","authors":"Lior Orbach, Shiran Gabay, Tal Montekio, Ariel S Chai, Yehuda Kariv, Meir Zemel, Adam Abu-Abeid, Guy Lahat, Jonathan B Yuval","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal level of resident autonomy in emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study assessed perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy with end stoma based on the presence of an attending surgeon.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, including 360 patients who underwent emergency colectomy with end stoma between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, including mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 360 patients, 36 (10 ​%) had surgery without an attending surgeon present. Baseline characteristics such as age (p ​= ​0.34), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p ​= ​0.313), and sex (p ​= ​0.598) were similar across groups. Perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences in major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3, p ​= ​0.176), 90-day complication rate (p ​= ​0.698), or 90-day mortality (p ​= ​0.389). Malignancy-related cases also did not differ in lymph node yield (p ​= ​0.685) or overall survival (log-rank p ​= ​0.574).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, Hartmann resections performed by resident teams were not associated with worse perioperative or oncologic outcomes, suggesting that resident autonomy can be safely increased without compromising patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of perioperative outcomes of emergency hartmann resections performed by residents versus attending surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Lior Orbach, Shiran Gabay, Tal Montekio, Ariel S Chai, Yehuda Kariv, Meir Zemel, Adam Abu-Abeid, Guy Lahat, Jonathan B Yuval\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal level of resident autonomy in emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study assessed perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy with end stoma based on the presence of an attending surgeon.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, including 360 patients who underwent emergency colectomy with end stoma between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, including mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 360 patients, 36 (10 ​%) had surgery without an attending surgeon present. Baseline characteristics such as age (p ​= ​0.34), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p ​= ​0.313), and sex (p ​= ​0.598) were similar across groups. Perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences in major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3, p ​= ​0.176), 90-day complication rate (p ​= ​0.698), or 90-day mortality (p ​= ​0.389). Malignancy-related cases also did not differ in lymph node yield (p ​= ​0.685) or overall survival (log-rank p ​= ​0.574).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, Hartmann resections performed by resident teams were not associated with worse perioperative or oncologic outcomes, suggesting that resident autonomy can be safely increased without compromising patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"116084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急诊结直肠手术中住院医生自主权的最佳水平尚不明确。本研究根据主治医生的存在情况,评估了接受急诊结肠造口术患者的围手术期结果:在一家三级教学医院进行了一项回顾性分析,研究对象包括在 2013 年至 2023 年期间接受急诊造口结肠切除术的 360 名患者。主要结果是围手术期并发症,包括死亡率:在 360 名患者中,有 36 人(10%)在没有主治医生在场的情况下进行了手术。各组患者的年龄(p = 0.34)、查尔森综合指数(p = 0.313)和性别(p = 0.598)等基线特征相似。围手术期结果显示,主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo ≥3,p = 0.176)、90 天并发症发生率(p = 0.698)或 90 天死亡率(p = 0.389)无显著差异。恶性肿瘤相关病例在淋巴结产量(p = 0.685)或总生存率(log-rank p = 0.574)方面也没有差异:在这项研究中,由住院医师团队实施的哈特曼切除术与围手术期或肿瘤学结果的恶化无关,这表明住院医师可以在不影响患者安全的情况下安全地提高自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of emergency hartmann resections performed by residents versus attending surgeons.

Objective: The optimal level of resident autonomy in emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study assessed perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy with end stoma based on the presence of an attending surgeon.

Participants: A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, including 360 patients who underwent emergency colectomy with end stoma between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, including mortality.

Results: Of the 360 patients, 36 (10 ​%) had surgery without an attending surgeon present. Baseline characteristics such as age (p ​= ​0.34), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p ​= ​0.313), and sex (p ​= ​0.598) were similar across groups. Perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences in major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3, p ​= ​0.176), 90-day complication rate (p ​= ​0.698), or 90-day mortality (p ​= ​0.389). Malignancy-related cases also did not differ in lymph node yield (p ​= ​0.685) or overall survival (log-rank p ​= ​0.574).

Conclusion: In this study, Hartmann resections performed by resident teams were not associated with worse perioperative or oncologic outcomes, suggesting that resident autonomy can be safely increased without compromising patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The multidisciplinary Landscape of gender affirmation surgical training. Are there any benefits to hospital consolidation? Global health experience among general surgery residents': Experiences, attitudes, and barriers. An organized approach to attract a diverse pool of applicants within a surgery residency program. Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1