乌干达轮状病毒疫苗的覆盖率和分配效益成本:对常规医疗机构汇总数据的分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s12962-024-00586-5
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Gatien de Broucker, Anthony Ssebagereka, Aloysius Mutebi, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Bryan Patenaude
{"title":"乌干达轮状病毒疫苗的覆盖率和分配效益成本:对常规医疗机构汇总数据的分析。","authors":"Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Gatien de Broucker, Anthony Ssebagereka, Aloysius Mutebi, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Bryan Patenaude","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00586-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Owing to the lack of local cost and clinical effectiveness data in sub-Saharan Africa, economic evaluations of the rotavirus vaccine are still limited in the region. In this study, we utilize different data sources, including aggregated routine health information system data to examine the net benefits of the rotavirus vaccine in Uganda. We also present ways in which health facility data can be used to assess subnational vaccination coverage as well as the effect of the vaccine on diarrhoea hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used monthly health facility data collected between 2015 and 2021 to study the relationship between rollout of rotavirus vaccine and diarrhoea hospitalization. We gathered information from empirical studies on the cost of diarrhoea (household and health facility) and vaccine administration to estimate the costs averted due to the rotavirus vaccine. As household costs, we considered out-of-pocket payments associated with the episodes of diarrhoea and the productivity loss associated with time spent on treatment and with mortality using a human capital approach. Finally, we employed an interrupted time series analysis to examine the effect of rotavirus vaccine on diarrhoea hospitalization. Costs are presented in 2018 US dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of 2021, nationwide coverage of the first and second doses of the rotavirus vaccine (RV) in Uganda was estimated at 89% and 65% respectively, with variations observed across the regions. The study revealed a decrease in diarrhoea hospitalization by 1% for each 1% increase in RV coverage. Moreover, the study showed that diarrhoea hospitalization reduced by 2% for each additional month post- vaccine rollout. Excluding productivity losses due to mortality, the analyses of costs averted due to the RV reveal that between 2018 and 2021, Uganda saved approximately $57 million ($7 per capita) in expenses associated with diarrhoea. The return on investment (ROI) due to RV was calculated to be $1.48 per dollar invested. When including mortality costs, the net benefit reached up to $3 billion in economic cost ($385 per capita), and an ROI of $78 overall. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that RV provided substantial health benefits, particularly for socially disadvantaged groups. Excluding mortality costs, the ROI for the two most disadvantaged groups ranged from $1.71 to $2.03 per dollar spent, while for the remaining groups, it ranged from $1.10 to $1.14.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This manuscript stresses the importance of RV in alleviating the burden of diarrhoeal diseases and associated costs in Uganda. The study not only emphasizes the tangible benefits derived from the vaccine but also highlights the role of routine aggregated healthcare information systems in systematically monitoring the effectiveness and coverage of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coverage and distributional benefit-cost of rotavirus vaccine in Uganda: an analysis of routine health facility aggregated data.\",\"authors\":\"Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Gatien de Broucker, Anthony Ssebagereka, Aloysius Mutebi, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Bryan Patenaude\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-024-00586-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Owing to the lack of local cost and clinical effectiveness data in sub-Saharan Africa, economic evaluations of the rotavirus vaccine are still limited in the region. In this study, we utilize different data sources, including aggregated routine health information system data to examine the net benefits of the rotavirus vaccine in Uganda. We also present ways in which health facility data can be used to assess subnational vaccination coverage as well as the effect of the vaccine on diarrhoea hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used monthly health facility data collected between 2015 and 2021 to study the relationship between rollout of rotavirus vaccine and diarrhoea hospitalization. We gathered information from empirical studies on the cost of diarrhoea (household and health facility) and vaccine administration to estimate the costs averted due to the rotavirus vaccine. As household costs, we considered out-of-pocket payments associated with the episodes of diarrhoea and the productivity loss associated with time spent on treatment and with mortality using a human capital approach. Finally, we employed an interrupted time series analysis to examine the effect of rotavirus vaccine on diarrhoea hospitalization. Costs are presented in 2018 US dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of 2021, nationwide coverage of the first and second doses of the rotavirus vaccine (RV) in Uganda was estimated at 89% and 65% respectively, with variations observed across the regions. The study revealed a decrease in diarrhoea hospitalization by 1% for each 1% increase in RV coverage. Moreover, the study showed that diarrhoea hospitalization reduced by 2% for each additional month post- vaccine rollout. Excluding productivity losses due to mortality, the analyses of costs averted due to the RV reveal that between 2018 and 2021, Uganda saved approximately $57 million ($7 per capita) in expenses associated with diarrhoea. The return on investment (ROI) due to RV was calculated to be $1.48 per dollar invested. When including mortality costs, the net benefit reached up to $3 billion in economic cost ($385 per capita), and an ROI of $78 overall. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that RV provided substantial health benefits, particularly for socially disadvantaged groups. Excluding mortality costs, the ROI for the two most disadvantaged groups ranged from $1.71 to $2.03 per dollar spent, while for the remaining groups, it ranged from $1.10 to $1.14.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This manuscript stresses the importance of RV in alleviating the burden of diarrhoeal diseases and associated costs in Uganda. The study not only emphasizes the tangible benefits derived from the vaccine but also highlights the role of routine aggregated healthcare information systems in systematically monitoring the effectiveness and coverage of interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583679/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00586-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00586-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于撒哈拉以南非洲地区缺乏当地的成本和临床效果数据,该地区对轮状病毒疫苗的经济评估仍然有限。在本研究中,我们利用不同的数据来源,包括常规卫生信息系统的汇总数据,来考察轮状病毒疫苗在乌干达的净效益。我们还介绍了如何利用卫生机构数据评估次国家级疫苗接种覆盖率以及疫苗对腹泻住院治疗的影响:我们利用在 2015 年至 2021 年间收集的每月医疗机构数据来研究轮状病毒疫苗的推广与腹泻住院率之间的关系。我们从有关腹泻(家庭和医疗机构)和疫苗接种成本的实证研究中收集了信息,以估算轮状病毒疫苗避免的成本。作为家庭成本,我们考虑了与腹泻发作相关的自付费用以及与治疗时间相关的生产力损失,并采用人力资本方法考虑了死亡率。最后,我们采用了间断时间序列分析法来研究轮状病毒疫苗对腹泻住院治疗的影响。成本以 2018 美元为单位:截至 2021 年,乌干达轮状病毒疫苗(RV)第一剂和第二剂的全国覆盖率估计分别为 89% 和 65%,各地区之间存在差异。研究显示,轮状病毒疫苗覆盖率每提高 1%,腹泻住院率就会降低 1%。此外,研究还显示,疫苗推广后每增加一个月,腹泻住院人数就会减少 2%。如果不考虑死亡率造成的生产力损失,对因流脑疫苗而避免的成本进行的分析表明,2018 年至 2021 年期间,乌干达在腹泻相关费用方面可节省约 5700 万美元(人均 7 美元)。根据计算,每投资 1 美元,可获得 1.48 美元的投资回报(ROI)。如果将死亡率成本计算在内,净收益可达 30 亿美元的经济成本(人均 385 美元),总体投资回报率为 78 美元。此外,研究还表明,房车还能带来巨大的健康效益,尤其是对社会弱势群体而言。除去死亡率成本,两个最弱势群体每花费 1 美元的投资回报率从 1.71 美元到 2.03 美元不等,而其余群体的投资回报率则从 1.10 美元到 1.14 美元不等:本手稿强调了 RV 在减轻乌干达腹泻疾病负担和相关成本方面的重要性。该研究不仅强调了疫苗带来的实际益处,还突出了常规综合医疗信息系统在系统监测干预措施的有效性和覆盖面方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coverage and distributional benefit-cost of rotavirus vaccine in Uganda: an analysis of routine health facility aggregated data.

Introduction: Owing to the lack of local cost and clinical effectiveness data in sub-Saharan Africa, economic evaluations of the rotavirus vaccine are still limited in the region. In this study, we utilize different data sources, including aggregated routine health information system data to examine the net benefits of the rotavirus vaccine in Uganda. We also present ways in which health facility data can be used to assess subnational vaccination coverage as well as the effect of the vaccine on diarrhoea hospitalization.

Methods: We used monthly health facility data collected between 2015 and 2021 to study the relationship between rollout of rotavirus vaccine and diarrhoea hospitalization. We gathered information from empirical studies on the cost of diarrhoea (household and health facility) and vaccine administration to estimate the costs averted due to the rotavirus vaccine. As household costs, we considered out-of-pocket payments associated with the episodes of diarrhoea and the productivity loss associated with time spent on treatment and with mortality using a human capital approach. Finally, we employed an interrupted time series analysis to examine the effect of rotavirus vaccine on diarrhoea hospitalization. Costs are presented in 2018 US dollars.

Results: As of 2021, nationwide coverage of the first and second doses of the rotavirus vaccine (RV) in Uganda was estimated at 89% and 65% respectively, with variations observed across the regions. The study revealed a decrease in diarrhoea hospitalization by 1% for each 1% increase in RV coverage. Moreover, the study showed that diarrhoea hospitalization reduced by 2% for each additional month post- vaccine rollout. Excluding productivity losses due to mortality, the analyses of costs averted due to the RV reveal that between 2018 and 2021, Uganda saved approximately $57 million ($7 per capita) in expenses associated with diarrhoea. The return on investment (ROI) due to RV was calculated to be $1.48 per dollar invested. When including mortality costs, the net benefit reached up to $3 billion in economic cost ($385 per capita), and an ROI of $78 overall. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that RV provided substantial health benefits, particularly for socially disadvantaged groups. Excluding mortality costs, the ROI for the two most disadvantaged groups ranged from $1.71 to $2.03 per dollar spent, while for the remaining groups, it ranged from $1.10 to $1.14.

Conclusion: This manuscript stresses the importance of RV in alleviating the burden of diarrhoeal diseases and associated costs in Uganda. The study not only emphasizes the tangible benefits derived from the vaccine but also highlights the role of routine aggregated healthcare information systems in systematically monitoring the effectiveness and coverage of interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
期刊最新文献
Assessing diagnosis-related groups based direct medical expenditures of chronic disease patients in general hospital of lower southern Thailand. Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation. Coverage and distributional benefit-cost of rotavirus vaccine in Uganda: an analysis of routine health facility aggregated data. Cost-effectiveness of fenofibrate for preventing diabetic complications in Australia. Cost-effectiveness of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce the occurrence of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1