X Hu, W Cai, D Xu, D Li, F Chen, M Chen, Y Wu, Y Shen
{"title":"DECAF 评分在预测慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重导致的住院死亡率方面的表现。","authors":"X Hu, W Cai, D Xu, D Li, F Chen, M Chen, Y Wu, Y Shen","doi":"10.5588/ijtld.24.0252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>This study aimed to investigate the overall prognostic performance of the DECAF (dyspnoea, eosinopenia, consolidation, acidaemia, atrial fibrillation) score for in-hospital death in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) through a retrospective cohort study and an updated meta-analysis.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive performance of DECAF were analysed, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) as criteria for accuracy. A literature search was performed in databases. The summary ROC (SROC) curve was used to assess the overall performance of the DECAF score.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>Twenty-three non-survivors and 292 survivors of AECOPD were included. At a cut-off value of 1.5, DECAF scores showed good sensitivity (78.3%), low specificity (55.1%), and AUC (0.719, 95% CI 0.614-0.824). Additionally, 22 studies (including our study) with 824 non-survivors and 8,957 survivors were included in this meta-analysis. The summary estimates were listed as follows: sensitivity 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.83); specificity 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.85); positive likelihood ratio 3.2 (95% CI 2.4-4.3); negative likelihood ratio 0.31 (95% CI 0.23-0.40); and diagnostic odds ratio 10.00 (95% CI 7-16). The AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.86).</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title>The DECAF score is a simple tool to predict mortality in hospitalised patients with AECOPD, and the results of this study should be further validated.</sec>.</p>","PeriodicalId":14411,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease","volume":"28 12","pages":"564-571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the DECAF score in predicting hospital mortality due to acute exacerbations of COPD.\",\"authors\":\"X Hu, W Cai, D Xu, D Li, F Chen, M Chen, Y Wu, Y Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtld.24.0252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>This study aimed to investigate the overall prognostic performance of the DECAF (dyspnoea, eosinopenia, consolidation, acidaemia, atrial fibrillation) score for in-hospital death in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) through a retrospective cohort study and an updated meta-analysis.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive performance of DECAF were analysed, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) as criteria for accuracy. A literature search was performed in databases. The summary ROC (SROC) curve was used to assess the overall performance of the DECAF score.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>Twenty-three non-survivors and 292 survivors of AECOPD were included. At a cut-off value of 1.5, DECAF scores showed good sensitivity (78.3%), low specificity (55.1%), and AUC (0.719, 95% CI 0.614-0.824). Additionally, 22 studies (including our study) with 824 non-survivors and 8,957 survivors were included in this meta-analysis. The summary estimates were listed as follows: sensitivity 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.83); specificity 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.85); positive likelihood ratio 3.2 (95% CI 2.4-4.3); negative likelihood ratio 0.31 (95% CI 0.23-0.40); and diagnostic odds ratio 10.00 (95% CI 7-16). The AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.86).</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title>The DECAF score is a simple tool to predict mortality in hospitalised patients with AECOPD, and the results of this study should be further validated.</sec>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease\",\"volume\":\"28 12\",\"pages\":\"564-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.24.0252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.24.0252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景本研究旨在通过一项回顾性队列研究和一项最新的荟萃分析,探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者院内死亡的 DECAF(呼吸困难、粒细胞减少、合并症、酸血症、心房颤动)评分的总体预后性能。方法以接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)作为准确性标准,分析了 DECAF 的敏感性、特异性和预测性能。在数据库中进行了文献检索。结果纳入了 23 名非 AECOPD 幸存者和 292 名 AECOPD 幸存者。在截断值为 1.5 时,DECAF 评分显示出良好的敏感性(78.3%)、较低的特异性(55.1%)和 AUC(0.719,95% CI 0.614-0.824)。此外,本次荟萃分析还纳入了 22 项研究(包括我们的研究),其中包括 824 名非幸存者和 8957 名幸存者。汇总估计值如下:灵敏度 0.77(95% CI 0.69-0.83);特异度 0.76(95% CI 0.67-0.85);阳性似然比 3.2(95% CI 2.4-4.3);阴性似然比 0.31(95% CI 0.23-0.40);诊断几率比 10.00(95% CI 7-16)。结论DECAF评分是预测AECOPD住院患者死亡率的简单工具,本研究结果应进一步验证。
Performance of the DECAF score in predicting hospital mortality due to acute exacerbations of COPD.
BACKGROUNDThis study aimed to investigate the overall prognostic performance of the DECAF (dyspnoea, eosinopenia, consolidation, acidaemia, atrial fibrillation) score for in-hospital death in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) through a retrospective cohort study and an updated meta-analysis.METHODSSensitivity, specificity, and predictive performance of DECAF were analysed, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) as criteria for accuracy. A literature search was performed in databases. The summary ROC (SROC) curve was used to assess the overall performance of the DECAF score.RESULTSTwenty-three non-survivors and 292 survivors of AECOPD were included. At a cut-off value of 1.5, DECAF scores showed good sensitivity (78.3%), low specificity (55.1%), and AUC (0.719, 95% CI 0.614-0.824). Additionally, 22 studies (including our study) with 824 non-survivors and 8,957 survivors were included in this meta-analysis. The summary estimates were listed as follows: sensitivity 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.83); specificity 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.85); positive likelihood ratio 3.2 (95% CI 2.4-4.3); negative likelihood ratio 0.31 (95% CI 0.23-0.40); and diagnostic odds ratio 10.00 (95% CI 7-16). The AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.86).CONCLUSIONSThe DECAF score is a simple tool to predict mortality in hospitalised patients with AECOPD, and the results of this study should be further validated..
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease publishes articles on all aspects of lung health, including public health-related issues such as training programmes, cost-benefit analysis, legislation, epidemiology, intervention studies and health systems research. The IJTLD is dedicated to the continuing education of physicians and health personnel and the dissemination of information on tuberculosis and lung health world-wide.