Satoru Mitsuboshi, Makoto Morizumi, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori, Kazumasa Kotake
{"title":"矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂与肾脏损害之间的关系:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Satoru Mitsuboshi, Makoto Morizumi, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori, Kazumasa Kotake","doi":"10.1002/phar.4618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conflicting data have been reported on the association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether MRAs affect the risk of AKI. MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were comprehensively searched to extract all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected that compared MRA versus placebo or no treatment and had study populations consisting of patients with heart or kidney disease. The primary outcome was AKI. The secondary outcome was kidney injury, including AKI and non-AKI. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. MRAs were not associated with an increased risk of AKI (risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.46, p = 0.29, I<sup>2</sup> = 15%, 18,065 patients, 13 RCTs, moderate certainty). For the secondary outcome, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.24-1.87, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 48%, 27,492 patients, 33 RCTs, low certainty). In particular, only canrenone (RR 5.39, 95% CI 2.17-13.37, p < 0.01) and spironolactone (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14, p < 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury. However, eplerenone and finerenone seem not to increase the risk of kidney injury in patients with heart or kidney disease. The selection of MRAs might influence the risk of kidney-associated events. Further studies focusing on individual MRAs may be needed to clarify these differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and kidney harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Satoru Mitsuboshi, Makoto Morizumi, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori, Kazumasa Kotake\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/phar.4618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Conflicting data have been reported on the association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether MRAs affect the risk of AKI. MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were comprehensively searched to extract all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected that compared MRA versus placebo or no treatment and had study populations consisting of patients with heart or kidney disease. The primary outcome was AKI. The secondary outcome was kidney injury, including AKI and non-AKI. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. MRAs were not associated with an increased risk of AKI (risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.46, p = 0.29, I<sup>2</sup> = 15%, 18,065 patients, 13 RCTs, moderate certainty). For the secondary outcome, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.24-1.87, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 48%, 27,492 patients, 33 RCTs, low certainty). In particular, only canrenone (RR 5.39, 95% CI 2.17-13.37, p < 0.01) and spironolactone (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14, p < 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury. However, eplerenone and finerenone seem not to increase the risk of kidney injury in patients with heart or kidney disease. The selection of MRAs might influence the risk of kidney-associated events. Further studies focusing on individual MRAs may be needed to clarify these differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于矿质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)与急性肾损伤(AKI)之间的关系,已有相互矛盾的数据报道。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估 MRA 是否会影响急性肾损伤的风险。我们通过 PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 网站对 MEDLINE 进行了全面检索,以提取所有相关研究。筛选出的随机对照试验(RCT)对 MRA 与安慰剂或无治疗进行了比较,研究对象包括心脏病或肾病患者。主要结果为 AKI。次要结果是肾损伤,包括 AKI 和非 AKI。荟萃分析纳入了 33 项研究。MRA 与 AKI 风险增加无关(风险比 [RR] 1.13,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.88-1.46,P = 0.29,I2 = 15%,18,065 名患者,13 项 RCT,中度确定性)。在次要结局方面,MRA 与肾损伤风险增加有关(RR 1.52,95% CI 1.24-1.87,P 2 = 48%,27,492 名患者,33 项 RCT,低度确定性)。其中,只有坎利酮(RR 5.39,95% CI 2.17-13.37,P
Association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and kidney harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Conflicting data have been reported on the association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether MRAs affect the risk of AKI. MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were comprehensively searched to extract all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected that compared MRA versus placebo or no treatment and had study populations consisting of patients with heart or kidney disease. The primary outcome was AKI. The secondary outcome was kidney injury, including AKI and non-AKI. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. MRAs were not associated with an increased risk of AKI (risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.46, p = 0.29, I2 = 15%, 18,065 patients, 13 RCTs, moderate certainty). For the secondary outcome, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.24-1.87, p < 0.01, I2 = 48%, 27,492 patients, 33 RCTs, low certainty). In particular, only canrenone (RR 5.39, 95% CI 2.17-13.37, p < 0.01) and spironolactone (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14, p < 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury. However, eplerenone and finerenone seem not to increase the risk of kidney injury in patients with heart or kidney disease. The selection of MRAs might influence the risk of kidney-associated events. Further studies focusing on individual MRAs may be needed to clarify these differences.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.