脑外伤后静脉血栓栓塞早期化学预防的安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。军事创伤性脑损伤倡议研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.3171/2024.7.JNS232697
Bradley A Dengler, Thaddeus Haight, Adele Fu, Shaheryar J Hafeez, Michael Cirivello, Viktor Bartanusz
{"title":"脑外伤后静脉血栓栓塞早期化学预防的安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。军事创伤性脑损伤倡议研究。","authors":"Bradley A Dengler, Thaddeus Haight, Adele Fu, Shaheryar J Hafeez, Michael Cirivello, Viktor Bartanusz","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.JNS232697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is continuing uncertainty about the safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this paper was to 1) calculate the risk of progression of posttraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after VTE chemoprophylaxis, and 2) compare the probability of ICH progression in early versus late VTE prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched for English-language literature from database inception to January 2023. Two independent reviewers selected studies on post-TBI VTE chemoprophylaxis in hospitalized patients. Study parameters included ICH progression (as determined by follow-up imaging after starting chemoprophylaxis) in relation to use versus nonuse, timing, and type of VTE chemoprophylaxis. Pertinent variables included author, year, study type, demographic variables, cranial and systemic Injury Severity Scores, and data documenting ICH progression or indirect evidence of TBI worsening after the initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a 7.0% (95% CI 4.0%-10.0%) risk of CT-documented ICH progression following VTE chemoprophylaxis in the prophylactically treated group. There was no difference between the early versus late VTE prophylaxis groups for ICH progression (12 studies; OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.56-1.12]). There was also no significant difference in CT-documented ICH progression between the prophylactically treated and nontreated groups (5 studies; OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.28-1.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review of the literature shows that VTE chemoprophylaxis 72 hours after TBI is considered safe by the majority of authors. This meta-analysis did not reveal any evidence of increased risk of ICH when starting VTE chemoprophylaxis earlier, i.e., within 72 hours of TBI; however, it is important to emphasize that only a small number of lower-quality studies addressed the 48-hour or 24-hour time point. A randomized noninferiority trial should be the next step in answering the question of early (within 72 hours) VTE chemoprophylaxis after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A military traumatic brain injury initiative study.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley A Dengler, Thaddeus Haight, Adele Fu, Shaheryar J Hafeez, Michael Cirivello, Viktor Bartanusz\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.7.JNS232697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is continuing uncertainty about the safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this paper was to 1) calculate the risk of progression of posttraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after VTE chemoprophylaxis, and 2) compare the probability of ICH progression in early versus late VTE prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched for English-language literature from database inception to January 2023. Two independent reviewers selected studies on post-TBI VTE chemoprophylaxis in hospitalized patients. Study parameters included ICH progression (as determined by follow-up imaging after starting chemoprophylaxis) in relation to use versus nonuse, timing, and type of VTE chemoprophylaxis. Pertinent variables included author, year, study type, demographic variables, cranial and systemic Injury Severity Scores, and data documenting ICH progression or indirect evidence of TBI worsening after the initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a 7.0% (95% CI 4.0%-10.0%) risk of CT-documented ICH progression following VTE chemoprophylaxis in the prophylactically treated group. There was no difference between the early versus late VTE prophylaxis groups for ICH progression (12 studies; OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.56-1.12]). There was also no significant difference in CT-documented ICH progression between the prophylactically treated and nontreated groups (5 studies; OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.28-1.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review of the literature shows that VTE chemoprophylaxis 72 hours after TBI is considered safe by the majority of authors. This meta-analysis did not reveal any evidence of increased risk of ICH when starting VTE chemoprophylaxis earlier, i.e., within 72 hours of TBI; however, it is important to emphasize that only a small number of lower-quality studies addressed the 48-hour or 24-hour time point. A randomized noninferiority trial should be the next step in answering the question of early (within 72 hours) VTE chemoprophylaxis after TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS232697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS232697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者进行早期静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)化学预防的安全性仍存在不确定性。本文旨在:1)计算VTE化学预防后创伤后颅内出血(ICH)恶化的风险;2)比较早期与晚期VTE预防后ICH恶化的概率:作者检索了从数据库建立到 2023 年 1 月的英文文献。两位独立审稿人选择了有关住院患者创伤后 VTE 化学预防的研究。研究参数包括ICH进展(通过开始化学预防后的随访成像确定)与VTE化学预防的使用与否、时间和类型的关系。相关变量包括作者、年份、研究类型、人口统计学变量、颅脑和全身损伤严重程度评分,以及在开始使用 VTE 化学预防后 ICH 进展或 TBI 恶化间接证据的记录数据:30项研究符合纳入标准。在预防性治疗组中,VTE 化学预防后 CT 记录的 ICH 进展风险为 7.0%(95% CI 4.0%-10.0%)。早期与晚期 VTE 预防组在 ICH 进展方面没有差异(12 项研究;OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.56-1.12])。预防性治疗组和非预防性治疗组在 CT 记录的 ICH 进展方面也无明显差异(5 项研究;OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.28-1.18]):文献综述显示,大多数学者认为创伤后 72 小时进行 VTE 化学预防是安全的。这项荟萃分析没有发现任何证据表明,如果提前开始 VTE 化学预防,即在 TBI 后 72 小时内开始,ICH 风险会增加;但需要强调的是,只有少数质量较低的研究涉及 48 小时或 24 小时时间点。要回答创伤后早期(72 小时内)VTE 化学预防的问题,下一步应进行随机非劣效性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A military traumatic brain injury initiative study.

Objective: There is continuing uncertainty about the safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this paper was to 1) calculate the risk of progression of posttraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after VTE chemoprophylaxis, and 2) compare the probability of ICH progression in early versus late VTE prophylaxis.

Methods: The authors searched for English-language literature from database inception to January 2023. Two independent reviewers selected studies on post-TBI VTE chemoprophylaxis in hospitalized patients. Study parameters included ICH progression (as determined by follow-up imaging after starting chemoprophylaxis) in relation to use versus nonuse, timing, and type of VTE chemoprophylaxis. Pertinent variables included author, year, study type, demographic variables, cranial and systemic Injury Severity Scores, and data documenting ICH progression or indirect evidence of TBI worsening after the initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis.

Results: Thirty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a 7.0% (95% CI 4.0%-10.0%) risk of CT-documented ICH progression following VTE chemoprophylaxis in the prophylactically treated group. There was no difference between the early versus late VTE prophylaxis groups for ICH progression (12 studies; OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.56-1.12]). There was also no significant difference in CT-documented ICH progression between the prophylactically treated and nontreated groups (5 studies; OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.28-1.18]).

Conclusions: The review of the literature shows that VTE chemoprophylaxis 72 hours after TBI is considered safe by the majority of authors. This meta-analysis did not reveal any evidence of increased risk of ICH when starting VTE chemoprophylaxis earlier, i.e., within 72 hours of TBI; however, it is important to emphasize that only a small number of lower-quality studies addressed the 48-hour or 24-hour time point. A randomized noninferiority trial should be the next step in answering the question of early (within 72 hours) VTE chemoprophylaxis after TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor. Factors related to venous air embolism during semisitting position surgery. Multinuclear thalamic targeting with human stereotactic electroencephalography: surgical technique and nuances. Primary and salvage radiosurgery for neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas. Safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A military traumatic brain injury initiative study. The impact of initial vascular morphology on outcomes in patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection presenting with isolated headache.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1