PvRBP2b-TfR1 相互作用对于柬埔寨的间日疟原虫分离株侵入网状细胞并非必不可少。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY NPJ Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1038/s41541-024-01031-7
Lionel B Feufack-Donfack, Léa Baldor, Camille Roesch, Baura Tat, Agnes Orban, Dynang Seng, Jeremy Salvador, Nimol Khim, Lenore Carias, Christopher L King, Bruce Russell, Francois Nosten, Alice Sm Ong, Haitong Mao, Laurent Renia, Eugenia Lo, Benoit Witkowski, Jean Popovici
{"title":"PvRBP2b-TfR1 相互作用对于柬埔寨的间日疟原虫分离株侵入网状细胞并非必不可少。","authors":"Lionel B Feufack-Donfack, Léa Baldor, Camille Roesch, Baura Tat, Agnes Orban, Dynang Seng, Jeremy Salvador, Nimol Khim, Lenore Carias, Christopher L King, Bruce Russell, Francois Nosten, Alice Sm Ong, Haitong Mao, Laurent Renia, Eugenia Lo, Benoit Witkowski, Jean Popovici","doi":"10.1038/s41541-024-01031-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasmodium vivax is the most widespread of the different Plasmodium species able to infect humans and is responsible for most malaria cases outside Africa. An effective, strain-transcending vaccine that alleviates or suppresses erythrocyte invasion would be a game-changer in eliminating vivax malaria. Recently, the binding of P. vivax Reticulocyte Binding Protein 2b (PvRBP2b) to human Transferrin receptor (TfR1) has been described as essential for reticulocyte invasion, making this parasite protein an appealing vaccine candidate. Here, using P. vivax Cambodian clinical isolates in robust ex vivo invasion assays, we show that anti-PvRBP2b polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit binding of PvRBP2b to TfR1 do not block P. vivax invasion into reticulocytes even at high concentrations. Anti-TfR1 antibodies do not inhibit P. vivax invasion either. Combinations at high concentrations of human monoclonal antibodies targeting different PvRBP2b epitopes do not inhibit invasion. Combinations of anti-PvRBP2b with anti-PvDBP do not enhance invasion inhibition caused by anti-PvDBP alone. We also show that the invasion of Cambodian P. vivax is trypsin-resistant while TfR1 is trypsin-sensitive, and we demonstrate that TfR1 is not recycled following trypsin treatment. We determined the PvRBP2b sequence of all isolates used in the invasion assays and analyzed polymorphism within epitopes recognized by anti-PvRBP2b antibodies. We show that polymorphism does not explain the absence of neutralization. Anti-PvRBP2b polyclonal antibodies recognized all four isolates tested in immunofluorescence assays while not inhibiting P. vivax invasion. Overall, our results demonstrate that PvRBP2b binding to TfR1 is not essential for invasion into reticulocytes of P. vivax Cambodian strains questioning the relevance of PvRBP2b as vaccine candidate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"9 1","pages":"232"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The PvRBP2b-TfR1 interaction is not essential for reticulocytes invasion by Plasmodium vivax isolates from Cambodia.\",\"authors\":\"Lionel B Feufack-Donfack, Léa Baldor, Camille Roesch, Baura Tat, Agnes Orban, Dynang Seng, Jeremy Salvador, Nimol Khim, Lenore Carias, Christopher L King, Bruce Russell, Francois Nosten, Alice Sm Ong, Haitong Mao, Laurent Renia, Eugenia Lo, Benoit Witkowski, Jean Popovici\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41541-024-01031-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plasmodium vivax is the most widespread of the different Plasmodium species able to infect humans and is responsible for most malaria cases outside Africa. An effective, strain-transcending vaccine that alleviates or suppresses erythrocyte invasion would be a game-changer in eliminating vivax malaria. Recently, the binding of P. vivax Reticulocyte Binding Protein 2b (PvRBP2b) to human Transferrin receptor (TfR1) has been described as essential for reticulocyte invasion, making this parasite protein an appealing vaccine candidate. Here, using P. vivax Cambodian clinical isolates in robust ex vivo invasion assays, we show that anti-PvRBP2b polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit binding of PvRBP2b to TfR1 do not block P. vivax invasion into reticulocytes even at high concentrations. Anti-TfR1 antibodies do not inhibit P. vivax invasion either. Combinations at high concentrations of human monoclonal antibodies targeting different PvRBP2b epitopes do not inhibit invasion. Combinations of anti-PvRBP2b with anti-PvDBP do not enhance invasion inhibition caused by anti-PvDBP alone. We also show that the invasion of Cambodian P. vivax is trypsin-resistant while TfR1 is trypsin-sensitive, and we demonstrate that TfR1 is not recycled following trypsin treatment. We determined the PvRBP2b sequence of all isolates used in the invasion assays and analyzed polymorphism within epitopes recognized by anti-PvRBP2b antibodies. We show that polymorphism does not explain the absence of neutralization. Anti-PvRBP2b polyclonal antibodies recognized all four isolates tested in immunofluorescence assays while not inhibiting P. vivax invasion. Overall, our results demonstrate that PvRBP2b binding to TfR1 is not essential for invasion into reticulocytes of P. vivax Cambodian strains questioning the relevance of PvRBP2b as vaccine candidate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-01031-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-01031-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间日疟原虫是能感染人类的各种疟原虫中分布最广的一种,是非洲以外大多数疟疾病例的罪魁祸首。一种有效的、能减轻或抑制红细胞侵袭的变异株疫苗将改变消除间日疟的局面。最近,间日疟网织红细胞结合蛋白 2b(PvRBP2b)与人类转铁蛋白受体(TfR1)的结合被描述为网织红细胞侵袭的必要条件,使这种寄生虫蛋白成为一种有吸引力的候选疫苗。在这里,我们利用柬埔寨间日疟原虫临床分离株进行了稳健的体外侵袭试验,结果表明抑制 PvRBP2b 与 TfR1 结合的抗 PvRBP2b 多克隆和单克隆抗体即使在高浓度下也不能阻止间日疟原虫侵袭网织红细胞。抗 TfR1 抗体也不能抑制间日疟原虫的入侵。针对不同 PvRBP2b 表位的高浓度人类单克隆抗体组合也不能抑制侵袭。将抗 PvRBP2b 与抗 PvDBP 结合使用也不会增强单独使用抗 PvDBP 造成的入侵抑制作用。我们还发现,柬埔寨间日疟原虫的侵袭对胰蛋白酶具有抗性,而 TfR1 对胰蛋白酶敏感,我们还证明了 TfR1 在胰蛋白酶处理后不会被回收。我们确定了入侵试验中使用的所有分离株的 PvRBP2b 序列,并分析了抗 PvRBP2b 抗体识别的表位内的多态性。我们发现,多态性并不能解释为什么没有中和作用。在免疫荧光试验中,抗 PvRBP2b 多克隆抗体能识别所有四种受试分离物,但不能抑制间日疟原虫的侵袭。总之,我们的研究结果表明,PvRBP2b 与 TfR1 的结合对于侵入柬埔寨间日疟原虫株的网状细胞并不是必不可少的,这对 PvRBP2b 作为候选疫苗的相关性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The PvRBP2b-TfR1 interaction is not essential for reticulocytes invasion by Plasmodium vivax isolates from Cambodia.

Plasmodium vivax is the most widespread of the different Plasmodium species able to infect humans and is responsible for most malaria cases outside Africa. An effective, strain-transcending vaccine that alleviates or suppresses erythrocyte invasion would be a game-changer in eliminating vivax malaria. Recently, the binding of P. vivax Reticulocyte Binding Protein 2b (PvRBP2b) to human Transferrin receptor (TfR1) has been described as essential for reticulocyte invasion, making this parasite protein an appealing vaccine candidate. Here, using P. vivax Cambodian clinical isolates in robust ex vivo invasion assays, we show that anti-PvRBP2b polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit binding of PvRBP2b to TfR1 do not block P. vivax invasion into reticulocytes even at high concentrations. Anti-TfR1 antibodies do not inhibit P. vivax invasion either. Combinations at high concentrations of human monoclonal antibodies targeting different PvRBP2b epitopes do not inhibit invasion. Combinations of anti-PvRBP2b with anti-PvDBP do not enhance invasion inhibition caused by anti-PvDBP alone. We also show that the invasion of Cambodian P. vivax is trypsin-resistant while TfR1 is trypsin-sensitive, and we demonstrate that TfR1 is not recycled following trypsin treatment. We determined the PvRBP2b sequence of all isolates used in the invasion assays and analyzed polymorphism within epitopes recognized by anti-PvRBP2b antibodies. We show that polymorphism does not explain the absence of neutralization. Anti-PvRBP2b polyclonal antibodies recognized all four isolates tested in immunofluorescence assays while not inhibiting P. vivax invasion. Overall, our results demonstrate that PvRBP2b binding to TfR1 is not essential for invasion into reticulocytes of P. vivax Cambodian strains questioning the relevance of PvRBP2b as vaccine candidate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
期刊最新文献
Ad26.RSV.preF completely protects calves from severe respiratory disease induced by bovine RSV challenge. Author Correction: Reply to: mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations are not associated with RVO development 21 days and 12 weeks after vaccination. A randomized trial comparing safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of self-amplifying mRNA and adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines. The PvRBP2b-TfR1 interaction is not essential for reticulocytes invasion by Plasmodium vivax isolates from Cambodia. Effect of XBB.1.5-adapted booster vaccination on the imprinting of SARS-CoV-2 immunity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1