澳大利亚先天性心脏病患儿神经发育后续护理路径和流程。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Research Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1038/s41390-024-03722-2
Bridget Abell, David Rodwell, Karen J Eagleson, Ben Auld, Samudragupta Bora, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert Justo, William Parsonage, Steven M McPhail
{"title":"澳大利亚先天性心脏病患儿神经发育后续护理路径和流程。","authors":"Bridget Abell, David Rodwell, Karen J Eagleson, Ben Auld, Samudragupta Bora, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert Justo, William Parsonage, Steven M McPhail","doi":"10.1038/s41390-024-03722-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International consensus exists for neurodevelopmental follow-up care of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) to support timely intervention for developmental delays. Yet, documentation of how this care is implemented in Australia is lacking. This study aimed to identify, categorise, and understand care pathways and services supporting neurodevelopmental follow-up of Australian children with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study, using semi-structured virtual interviews with healthcare professionals across Australia involved in neurodevelopmental care of children with CHD (n = 52) was conducted. Data was analysed using a rapid qualitative approach including structured templates, data reduction, and inductive-deductive analysis of matrices to synthesise data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most neurodevelopmental follow-up was delivered as pathways through existing healthcare services rather than centre-based cardiac programmes. Service availability and accessibility varied across the country. Community-based primary care services, paediatric clinics, child development services, neonatal follow-up programmes, and allied health providers were commonly accessed pathway components. However, participants reported a lack of formal structures to coordinate care pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study identifies how cardiac neurodevelopmental follow-up in Australia can be embedded into existing services and adapted to meet local needs and contexts. Future approaches will benefit from integrating, leveraging, and growing existing services, although adoption of new models may be needed.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study found neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with CHD in Australia to be delivered as pathways through existing services rather than the centre-based cardiac follow-up programmes common in North America. Our study describes alternate options, including providers in community settings, that can be used for follow-up care delivery and how these can adapted to local context. Future approaches will benefit from integrating, leveraging, and growing existing services, although adoption of new models may be needed. Greater systematic coordination of care pathways is still required to optimise service delivery, inform planning, and support implementation of national standards of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurodevelopmental follow-up care pathways and processes for children with congenital heart disease in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Abell, David Rodwell, Karen J Eagleson, Ben Auld, Samudragupta Bora, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert Justo, William Parsonage, Steven M McPhail\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41390-024-03722-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International consensus exists for neurodevelopmental follow-up care of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) to support timely intervention for developmental delays. Yet, documentation of how this care is implemented in Australia is lacking. This study aimed to identify, categorise, and understand care pathways and services supporting neurodevelopmental follow-up of Australian children with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study, using semi-structured virtual interviews with healthcare professionals across Australia involved in neurodevelopmental care of children with CHD (n = 52) was conducted. Data was analysed using a rapid qualitative approach including structured templates, data reduction, and inductive-deductive analysis of matrices to synthesise data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most neurodevelopmental follow-up was delivered as pathways through existing healthcare services rather than centre-based cardiac programmes. Service availability and accessibility varied across the country. Community-based primary care services, paediatric clinics, child development services, neonatal follow-up programmes, and allied health providers were commonly accessed pathway components. However, participants reported a lack of formal structures to coordinate care pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study identifies how cardiac neurodevelopmental follow-up in Australia can be embedded into existing services and adapted to meet local needs and contexts. Future approaches will benefit from integrating, leveraging, and growing existing services, although adoption of new models may be needed.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study found neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with CHD in Australia to be delivered as pathways through existing services rather than the centre-based cardiac follow-up programmes common in North America. Our study describes alternate options, including providers in community settings, that can be used for follow-up care delivery and how these can adapted to local context. Future approaches will benefit from integrating, leveraging, and growing existing services, although adoption of new models may be needed. Greater systematic coordination of care pathways is still required to optimise service delivery, inform planning, and support implementation of national standards of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03722-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03722-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际上已就先天性心脏病(CHD)患儿的神经发育随访护理达成共识,以支持对发育迟缓进行及时干预。然而,澳大利亚却缺乏有关如何实施这种护理的文献资料。本研究旨在确定、分类和了解支持澳大利亚先天性心脏病儿童神经发育随访的护理途径和服务:这项定性研究采用半结构化虚拟访谈的方式,访问了澳大利亚各地参与 CHD 儿童神经发育护理的医护人员(n = 52)。数据分析采用快速定性方法,包括结构化模板、数据还原和矩阵归纳-演绎分析,以综合数据:结果:大多数神经发育随访都是通过现有的医疗保健服务提供的,而不是以中心为基础的心脏计划。全国各地的服务可用性和可及性各不相同。社区初级保健服务、儿科诊所、儿童发展服务、新生儿随访项目和专职医疗服务提供者是常见的随访途径组成部分。然而,参与者表示缺乏协调护理路径的正式机构:本研究确定了如何将澳大利亚的心脏神经发育随访纳入现有服务并加以调整,以满足当地的需求和环境。未来的方法将受益于现有服务的整合、利用和发展,尽管可能需要采用新的模式:本研究发现,澳大利亚为患有先天性心脏病的儿童提供的神经发育随访护理是通过现有服务提供的途径,而不是北美常见的以中心为基础的心脏随访项目。我们的研究介绍了可用于后续治疗的其他方案,包括社区环境中的提供者,以及如何根据当地情况对这些方案进行调整。未来的方法将受益于整合、利用和发展现有的服务,尽管可能需要采用新的模式。仍需要对护理路径进行更系统的协调,以优化服务提供、为规划提供信息并支持国家护理标准的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neurodevelopmental follow-up care pathways and processes for children with congenital heart disease in Australia.

Background: International consensus exists for neurodevelopmental follow-up care of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) to support timely intervention for developmental delays. Yet, documentation of how this care is implemented in Australia is lacking. This study aimed to identify, categorise, and understand care pathways and services supporting neurodevelopmental follow-up of Australian children with CHD.

Methods: A qualitative study, using semi-structured virtual interviews with healthcare professionals across Australia involved in neurodevelopmental care of children with CHD (n = 52) was conducted. Data was analysed using a rapid qualitative approach including structured templates, data reduction, and inductive-deductive analysis of matrices to synthesise data.

Results: Most neurodevelopmental follow-up was delivered as pathways through existing healthcare services rather than centre-based cardiac programmes. Service availability and accessibility varied across the country. Community-based primary care services, paediatric clinics, child development services, neonatal follow-up programmes, and allied health providers were commonly accessed pathway components. However, participants reported a lack of formal structures to coordinate care pathways.

Conclusions: The study identifies how cardiac neurodevelopmental follow-up in Australia can be embedded into existing services and adapted to meet local needs and contexts. Future approaches will benefit from integrating, leveraging, and growing existing services, although adoption of new models may be needed.

Impact: This study found neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with CHD in Australia to be delivered as pathways through existing services rather than the centre-based cardiac follow-up programmes common in North America. Our study describes alternate options, including providers in community settings, that can be used for follow-up care delivery and how these can adapted to local context. Future approaches will benefit from integrating, leveraging, and growing existing services, although adoption of new models may be needed. Greater systematic coordination of care pathways is still required to optimise service delivery, inform planning, and support implementation of national standards of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
期刊最新文献
Intestinal failure-associated liver disease model: a reduced phytosterol intravenous lipid emulsion prevents liver injury. Long COVID syndrome in children: neutrophilic granulocyte dysfunction and its correlation with disease severity. Discharge criteria, practices, and decision-making in the transition of preterm infants to home. Efficacy of phototherapy of neonatal jaundice - light wavelength matters. Cerebral oxygenation in the preterm newborn - what can we do?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1