创伤性孤立肩胛下肌撕裂的风险因素:蝶鞍反转

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024
Hyung Bin Park, Gyu-Min Lee, Ji Yong Gwark, Nitesh Gahlot, Jae-Boem Na
{"title":"创伤性孤立肩胛下肌撕裂的风险因素:蝶鞍反转","authors":"Hyung Bin Park, Gyu-Min Lee, Ji Yong Gwark, Nitesh Gahlot, Jae-Boem Na","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subscapularis tendon (SSC) tears have recently become an area of current research focus. However, the risk factors for atraumatic isolated SSC tears, particularly anatomical factors, remain poorly determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the associated factors contributing to isolated SSC tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved single shoulders of 605 subjects drawn from a cohort of rural residents. The inclusion criteria required each subject to sign an informed consent document and to have a complete clinical evaluation. The exclusion criteria comprised the absence of a complete magnetic resonance imaging study, current medication use that might have affected serum lipid levels, a history of shoulder trauma or surgery, and the presence of osteoarthritis, calcific tendinitis, frozen shoulder, or superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Diagnoses of isolated SSC tear were based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using demographic, physical, social, anatomical, comorbidities, and serological parameters. Anatomical variables included the supraspinatus fossa glenoid angle on axial (SGAX), a method to measure glenoid version, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal plans, and coracoid index. When multicollinearity among studied variables was detected, separate multivariable analyses were performed to address this issue, with each analysis including only one of those multicollinear variables along with the other significant variables obtained from univariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among anatomical variables, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal planes, as well as the coracoid index, did not show significant associations. However, SGAX, an index of glenoid version, was found to be significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears. Greater glenoid retroversion is significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears, along with age, waist circumference, dominant side involvement, manual labor, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury (P ≤ .013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SGAX, serving as an index for glenoid version, is an independently associated factor for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tendon tears, with greater glenoid retroversion being an anatomical risk factor for these tears, along with overuse-related factors such as dominant-side involvement and manual labor, as well as metabolic factors such as obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tear: glenoid retroversion.\",\"authors\":\"Hyung Bin Park, Gyu-Min Lee, Ji Yong Gwark, Nitesh Gahlot, Jae-Boem Na\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subscapularis tendon (SSC) tears have recently become an area of current research focus. However, the risk factors for atraumatic isolated SSC tears, particularly anatomical factors, remain poorly determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the associated factors contributing to isolated SSC tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved single shoulders of 605 subjects drawn from a cohort of rural residents. The inclusion criteria required each subject to sign an informed consent document and to have a complete clinical evaluation. The exclusion criteria comprised the absence of a complete magnetic resonance imaging study, current medication use that might have affected serum lipid levels, a history of shoulder trauma or surgery, and the presence of osteoarthritis, calcific tendinitis, frozen shoulder, or superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Diagnoses of isolated SSC tear were based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using demographic, physical, social, anatomical, comorbidities, and serological parameters. Anatomical variables included the supraspinatus fossa glenoid angle on axial (SGAX), a method to measure glenoid version, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal plans, and coracoid index. When multicollinearity among studied variables was detected, separate multivariable analyses were performed to address this issue, with each analysis including only one of those multicollinear variables along with the other significant variables obtained from univariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among anatomical variables, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal planes, as well as the coracoid index, did not show significant associations. However, SGAX, an index of glenoid version, was found to be significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears. Greater glenoid retroversion is significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears, along with age, waist circumference, dominant side involvement, manual labor, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury (P ≤ .013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SGAX, serving as an index for glenoid version, is an independently associated factor for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tendon tears, with greater glenoid retroversion being an anatomical risk factor for these tears, along with overuse-related factors such as dominant-side involvement and manual labor, as well as metabolic factors such as obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩胛下肌腱(SSC)撕裂最近已成为当前研究的一个重点领域。然而,非创伤性孤立性 SSC 撕裂的危险因素,尤其是解剖学因素,仍未得到充分确定。因此,本研究旨在确定导致孤立性 SSC 撕裂的相关因素:本研究涉及从农村居民中抽取的 605 名受试者的单肩。纳入标准要求每位受试者签署知情同意书,并接受完整的临床评估。排除标准包括未进行完整的核磁共振成像检查、正在服用可能会影响血清脂质水平的药物、有肩部外伤或手术史、患有骨关节炎、钙化性肌腱炎、肩周炎、肩袖上部或后上方撕裂。孤立性 SSC 撕裂的诊断是基于核磁共振成像结果。利用人口统计学、体格、社会、解剖、合并症和血清学参数进行了逻辑回归分析。解剖学变量包括冈上肌窝盂角轴位(SGAX),这是一种测量盂成形度的方法,轴位和矢状位上的肱骨角距离,以及角弓反张指数。当发现研究变量之间存在多重共线性时,就会分别进行多变量分析来解决这一问题,每次分析只包括其中一个多重共线性变量以及单变量分析得出的其他重要变量:在解剖变量中,轴向和矢状面上的肱骨间距以及冠状面指数没有显示出显著的关联性。然而,SGAX(盂成形指数)与非创伤性孤立性SSC撕裂有显著相关性。除了年龄、腰围、优势侧受累、体力劳动、糖尿病、代谢综合征和肱二头肌肌腱损伤外,更大的盂后凸与创伤性孤立性SSC撕裂也有显著相关性(P≤0.013):结论:SGAX作为盂成形指数,是创伤性孤立性肩胛下肌腱撕裂的一个独立相关因素,盂后倾越大是此类撕裂的一个解剖学风险因素,此外还有过度使用相关因素,如优势侧参与和体力劳动,以及代谢因素,如肥胖、糖尿病、代谢综合征和肱二头肌肌腱损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tear: glenoid retroversion.

Background: Subscapularis tendon (SSC) tears have recently become an area of current research focus. However, the risk factors for atraumatic isolated SSC tears, particularly anatomical factors, remain poorly determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the associated factors contributing to isolated SSC tears.

Methods: This study involved single shoulders of 605 subjects drawn from a cohort of rural residents. The inclusion criteria required each subject to sign an informed consent document and to have a complete clinical evaluation. The exclusion criteria comprised the absence of a complete magnetic resonance imaging study, current medication use that might have affected serum lipid levels, a history of shoulder trauma or surgery, and the presence of osteoarthritis, calcific tendinitis, frozen shoulder, or superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Diagnoses of isolated SSC tear were based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using demographic, physical, social, anatomical, comorbidities, and serological parameters. Anatomical variables included the supraspinatus fossa glenoid angle on axial (SGAX), a method to measure glenoid version, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal plans, and coracoid index. When multicollinearity among studied variables was detected, separate multivariable analyses were performed to address this issue, with each analysis including only one of those multicollinear variables along with the other significant variables obtained from univariate analyses.

Results: Among anatomical variables, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal planes, as well as the coracoid index, did not show significant associations. However, SGAX, an index of glenoid version, was found to be significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears. Greater glenoid retroversion is significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears, along with age, waist circumference, dominant side involvement, manual labor, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury (P ≤ .013).

Conclusions: The SGAX, serving as an index for glenoid version, is an independently associated factor for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tendon tears, with greater glenoid retroversion being an anatomical risk factor for these tears, along with overuse-related factors such as dominant-side involvement and manual labor, as well as metabolic factors such as obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Preoperative COVID-19 infection increases risk for 60-day complications following total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis Clinical results and computed tomography analysis of intuitive shoulder arthroplasty (ISA) stemless at a minimum follow-up of 2 years Influence of age-related bone density changes on primary stability in stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-implant finite element study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1