受欺凌与强迫症之间的关系:一项基于人群的遗传信息研究

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2
Josep Pol-Fuster, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Kayoko Isomura, Anna Sidorchuk, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Paul Lichtenstein, Brian M. D’Onofrio, Isabell Brikell, Henrik Larsson, Elles de Schipper, Jan C. Beucke, David Mataix-Cols
{"title":"受欺凌与强迫症之间的关系:一项基于人群的遗传信息研究","authors":"Josep Pol-Fuster, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Kayoko Isomura, Anna Sidorchuk, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Paul Lichtenstein, Brian M. D’Onofrio, Isabell Brikell, Henrik Larsson, Elles de Schipper, Jan C. Beucke, David Mataix-Cols","doi":"10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The extent to which bullying victimization is associated with an increased risk of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has received little empirical attention. This longitudinal, population-based, genetically informative study examined whether self-reported bullying victimization at age 15 was associated with a clinical diagnosis of OCD in the Swedish National Patient Register and with self-reported obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) at ages 18 and 24 in 16,030 twins from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden. Using a discordant twin design, including monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, each twin was compared with their co-twin, allowing a strict control of genetic and environmental confounding. At the population level, adjusting for birth year and sex, each standard deviation (SD) increase in bullying victimization was associated with a 32% increase in the odds of an OCD diagnosis (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21–1.44), of 0.13 SD in OCS at age 18 (β, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.11–0.16), and of 0.11 SD in OCS at age 24 (β, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07–0.16). While associations tended to persist in the within DZ-twin comparison models, the estimates attenuated and were no longer statistically significant in the within MZ-twin comparisons. These results suggest that the association between bullying victimization and OCD/OCS is likely due to genetic confounding and therefore incompatible with a strong causal effect. Other mechanisms, such as evocative gene-environment correlations, are more plausible explanations for the observed associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between bullying victimization and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a population-based, genetically informative study\",\"authors\":\"Josep Pol-Fuster, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Kayoko Isomura, Anna Sidorchuk, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Paul Lichtenstein, Brian M. D’Onofrio, Isabell Brikell, Henrik Larsson, Elles de Schipper, Jan C. Beucke, David Mataix-Cols\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The extent to which bullying victimization is associated with an increased risk of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has received little empirical attention. This longitudinal, population-based, genetically informative study examined whether self-reported bullying victimization at age 15 was associated with a clinical diagnosis of OCD in the Swedish National Patient Register and with self-reported obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) at ages 18 and 24 in 16,030 twins from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden. Using a discordant twin design, including monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, each twin was compared with their co-twin, allowing a strict control of genetic and environmental confounding. At the population level, adjusting for birth year and sex, each standard deviation (SD) increase in bullying victimization was associated with a 32% increase in the odds of an OCD diagnosis (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21–1.44), of 0.13 SD in OCS at age 18 (β, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.11–0.16), and of 0.11 SD in OCS at age 24 (β, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07–0.16). While associations tended to persist in the within DZ-twin comparison models, the estimates attenuated and were no longer statistically significant in the within MZ-twin comparisons. These results suggest that the association between bullying victimization and OCD/OCS is likely due to genetic confounding and therefore incompatible with a strong causal effect. Other mechanisms, such as evocative gene-environment correlations, are more plausible explanations for the observed associations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受欺凌与强迫症(OCD)患病风险增加的关联程度很少受到实证研究的关注。这项以人群为基础的遗传信息纵向研究考察了瑞典全国患者登记册中 16,030 对双胞胎中,15 岁时自我报告的欺凌受害情况是否与临床诊断的强迫症相关,以及与 18 岁和 24 岁时自我报告的强迫症状(OCS)是否相关。该研究采用不和双生子设计,包括单卵(MZ)双生子和双卵(DZ)双生子,将每个双生子与其同卵双生子进行比较,从而严格控制遗传和环境干扰。在人群水平上,根据出生年份和性别进行调整后发现,受欺凌程度每增加一个标准差(SD),患强迫症的几率就会增加32%(OR,1.32;95% CI,1.21-1.44),18岁时患强迫症的几率增加0.13个标准差(β,0.13;95% CI,0.11-0.16),24岁时患强迫症的几率增加0.11个标准差(β,0.11;95% CI,0.07-0.16)。在DZ-孪生子内部比较模型中,相关性往往持续存在,但在MZ-孪生子内部比较中,估计值有所减弱,不再具有统计学意义。这些结果表明,欺凌受害与强迫症/自闭症之间的关联很可能是由于遗传混杂造成的,因此与强烈的因果效应不符。其他机制,如诱发基因-环境相关性,是对观察到的关联更合理的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between bullying victimization and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a population-based, genetically informative study

The extent to which bullying victimization is associated with an increased risk of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has received little empirical attention. This longitudinal, population-based, genetically informative study examined whether self-reported bullying victimization at age 15 was associated with a clinical diagnosis of OCD in the Swedish National Patient Register and with self-reported obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) at ages 18 and 24 in 16,030 twins from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden. Using a discordant twin design, including monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, each twin was compared with their co-twin, allowing a strict control of genetic and environmental confounding. At the population level, adjusting for birth year and sex, each standard deviation (SD) increase in bullying victimization was associated with a 32% increase in the odds of an OCD diagnosis (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21–1.44), of 0.13 SD in OCS at age 18 (β, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.11–0.16), and of 0.11 SD in OCS at age 24 (β, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07–0.16). While associations tended to persist in the within DZ-twin comparison models, the estimates attenuated and were no longer statistically significant in the within MZ-twin comparisons. These results suggest that the association between bullying victimization and OCD/OCS is likely due to genetic confounding and therefore incompatible with a strong causal effect. Other mechanisms, such as evocative gene-environment correlations, are more plausible explanations for the observed associations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
期刊最新文献
Neuroimaging changes in major depression with brief computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy compared to waitlist S-ketamine exposure in early postnatal period induces social deficit mediated by excessive microglial synaptic pruning Bidirectional emotional regulation through prefrontal innervation of the locus coeruleus Neuroinflammatory fluid biomarkers in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic literature review Paternal age, de novo mutation, and age at onset among co-affected schizophrenia sib-pairs: whole-genome sequencing in multiplex families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1