结合 BA-WQI、AHP-TOPSIS、FL-DWQI、MOORA 和 RF 方法,对印度奥迪沙邦 Mahanadi 河流域饮用水地表水的质量评估及其污染情况采用创新方法

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Applied Water Science Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9
Abhijeet Das
{"title":"结合 BA-WQI、AHP-TOPSIS、FL-DWQI、MOORA 和 RF 方法,对印度奥迪沙邦 Mahanadi 河流域饮用水地表水的质量评估及其污染情况采用创新方法","authors":"Abhijeet Das","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water is essential for life, as it supports bodily functions, nourishes crops, and maintains ecosystems. Drinking water is crucial for maintaining good health and can also contribute to economic development by reducing health-care costs and improving productivity. The present study evaluated the surface water quality of Mahanadi River (Odisha, India). Hence, to evaluate the hydro-chemical processes, sources of contamination, and water quality, a methodical examination was conducted using an integrated approach, namely Bayesian Approximation (BA), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Technique of Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA), and Random Forest (RF) method. For this, water samples from 16 locations were taken for a period of 2018–2024, to test 21 physicochemical parameters in the selected sampling sites. From the assessment of parameters, with respect to WHO standards, pH indicates alkaline, TKN, and TC in all samples surpassed the prescribed drinking water limit. However, major ion and hardness spatial interpolation maps typically show that the quality of the water declines from upstream to downstream, with extreme values found in the downstream. The index for BA-WQI value revealed that 50% of samples belong to unsatisfactory water quality. This was also accompanied by several parameter’s high values, namely TDS, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, which were also highest among all the locations. Again, it is noticed that 12.50% of sites come under the zone of excellent water. However, 37.50% of samples indicated a good water class. As a result, a renowned MCDM model, such as AHP-TOPSIS, was presented, which makes use of rough set theory and Bayesian weights to provide a trustworthy and objective assessment of the total pollution levels at each sample site. Hence, this innovative technique depicted that W-(9) was the most polluted region if compared to other places, followed by W-(8), (16), (2), and (7), respectively. Based on FL-DWQI values, 12.5% of monitored specimens point towards excellent category, and rest 18.75% indicated as good quality. The remaining samples, or 68.75%, consist of ‘poor, very poor, and unsuitable qualities'. However, it was relevant that the degree of pollution at these stations was more closely linked to a variety of expanding human activities, such as excessive water use, fertilizer effects, agricultural runoff, and industrial activity in and around the river corridor. Additionally, MOORA has been conducted and performance scores were extracted. These four polluted sites such as W-(9), (8), (16), and (4), which contain higher performance scores, were 0.89, 0.093, 0.06, and 0.04. The major four places containing variables that exceeded the WHO limits, which account for TKN, coliform, and EC properties, were named accordingly. It was discovered that the main causes of the river’s water quality adulteration were agricultural runoff and home waste water. Furthermore, a RF analysis of the 16 sites was carried out and five critical variables such as Cl<sup>−</sup>, TH, TDS, EC, and TC were obtained on the basis of <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and RMSE score. Here, the first four RF factors were sufficient to explain 83.86%, 84.27%, 84.14%, and 85% of the model accuracy for correlation matrix. In the end, the target TC suggests about 89% of the total accuracy. Afterwards, water quality at all sampling locations was expressed in terms of RF-WQI. The value obtained varied between 15 and 243, denoting good to poor water. The main finding of the investigation was that at eight inadequate water sites, the main sources of adulteration of the river’s water quality were agricultural runoff, illegally deposited municipal solid waste, and deteriorating household water supplies. This work highlights the viability and dependability of integrating these techniques for monitoring and evaluating river water quality. Hence, these findings are essential for comprehending surface water sustainability, for human consumption in the research area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An innovative approach for quality assessment and its contamination on surface water for drinking purpose in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha of India, with the integration of BA-WQI, AHP-TOPSIS, FL-DWQI, MOORA, and RF methodology\",\"authors\":\"Abhijeet Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Water is essential for life, as it supports bodily functions, nourishes crops, and maintains ecosystems. Drinking water is crucial for maintaining good health and can also contribute to economic development by reducing health-care costs and improving productivity. The present study evaluated the surface water quality of Mahanadi River (Odisha, India). Hence, to evaluate the hydro-chemical processes, sources of contamination, and water quality, a methodical examination was conducted using an integrated approach, namely Bayesian Approximation (BA), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Technique of Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA), and Random Forest (RF) method. For this, water samples from 16 locations were taken for a period of 2018–2024, to test 21 physicochemical parameters in the selected sampling sites. From the assessment of parameters, with respect to WHO standards, pH indicates alkaline, TKN, and TC in all samples surpassed the prescribed drinking water limit. However, major ion and hardness spatial interpolation maps typically show that the quality of the water declines from upstream to downstream, with extreme values found in the downstream. The index for BA-WQI value revealed that 50% of samples belong to unsatisfactory water quality. This was also accompanied by several parameter’s high values, namely TDS, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, which were also highest among all the locations. Again, it is noticed that 12.50% of sites come under the zone of excellent water. However, 37.50% of samples indicated a good water class. As a result, a renowned MCDM model, such as AHP-TOPSIS, was presented, which makes use of rough set theory and Bayesian weights to provide a trustworthy and objective assessment of the total pollution levels at each sample site. Hence, this innovative technique depicted that W-(9) was the most polluted region if compared to other places, followed by W-(8), (16), (2), and (7), respectively. Based on FL-DWQI values, 12.5% of monitored specimens point towards excellent category, and rest 18.75% indicated as good quality. The remaining samples, or 68.75%, consist of ‘poor, very poor, and unsuitable qualities'. However, it was relevant that the degree of pollution at these stations was more closely linked to a variety of expanding human activities, such as excessive water use, fertilizer effects, agricultural runoff, and industrial activity in and around the river corridor. Additionally, MOORA has been conducted and performance scores were extracted. These four polluted sites such as W-(9), (8), (16), and (4), which contain higher performance scores, were 0.89, 0.093, 0.06, and 0.04. The major four places containing variables that exceeded the WHO limits, which account for TKN, coliform, and EC properties, were named accordingly. It was discovered that the main causes of the river’s water quality adulteration were agricultural runoff and home waste water. Furthermore, a RF analysis of the 16 sites was carried out and five critical variables such as Cl<sup>−</sup>, TH, TDS, EC, and TC were obtained on the basis of <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and RMSE score. Here, the first four RF factors were sufficient to explain 83.86%, 84.27%, 84.14%, and 85% of the model accuracy for correlation matrix. In the end, the target TC suggests about 89% of the total accuracy. Afterwards, water quality at all sampling locations was expressed in terms of RF-WQI. The value obtained varied between 15 and 243, denoting good to poor water. The main finding of the investigation was that at eight inadequate water sites, the main sources of adulteration of the river’s water quality were agricultural runoff, illegally deposited municipal solid waste, and deteriorating household water supplies. This work highlights the viability and dependability of integrating these techniques for monitoring and evaluating river water quality. Hence, these findings are essential for comprehending surface water sustainability, for human consumption in the research area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"14 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02326-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水是生命的必需品,因为它支持身体机能、滋养农作物并维护生态系统。饮用水对保持身体健康至关重要,还能通过降低医疗成本和提高生产力促进经济发展。本研究评估了马哈纳迪河(印度奥迪沙)的地表水质。因此,为了评估水化学过程、污染源和水质,我们采用了一种综合方法,即贝叶斯逼近法(BA)、层次分析法(AHP)--理想解相似度排序法(TOPSIS)、模糊逻辑法(FL)、基于比率分析的多目标优化法(MOORA)和随机森林法(RF)进行了研究。为此,从 16 个地点采集了 2018-2024 年期间的水样,以检测所选采样地点的 21 个理化参数。从参数评估结果来看,与世界卫生组织的标准相比,所有样本中的 pH 值显示为碱性,TKN 和 TC 超过了规定的饮用水限值。然而,主要离子和硬度空间插值图通常显示水质从上游向下游递减,极端值出现在下游。BA-WQI 值指数显示,50% 的水样属于不合格水质。同时,还有几个参数值较高,即 TDS、NO3-、Cl- 和 SO42-,在所有地点中也是最高的。我们还注意到,12.50% 的地点属于水质优良区。然而,37.50% 的样本属于良好水质。因此,提出了一个著名的 MCDM 模型,如 AHP-TOPSIS,该模型利用粗糙集理论和贝叶斯权重,对每个样本点的总污染水平进行了可信而客观的评估。因此,这一创新技术表明,与其他地方相比,W-(9) 是污染最严重的地区,其次分别是 W-(8)、(16)、(2) 和 (7)。根据 FL-DWQI 值,12.5% 的监测样本属于优级,其余 18.75% 属于良级。其余 68.75% 的样本属于 "差、极差和不合格"。然而,这些站点的污染程度与各种不断扩大的人类活动密切相关,如过度用水、肥料效应、农业径流以及河流走廊及其周边地区的工业活动。此外,还进行了 MOORA 分析并提取了性能分数。这四个污染点,如 W-(9)、(8)、(16)和(4),含有较高的性能分数,分别为 0.89、0.093、0.06 和 0.04。含有超过世界卫生组织限值的变量的主要四个地方,即总氨氮、大肠菌群和导电率特性,被相应地命名。结果发现,造成河流水质掺假的主要原因是农业径流和家庭废水。此外,还对 16 个地点进行了 RF 分析,并根据 R2 和 RMSE 分数得出了 Cl-、TH、TDS、EC 和 TC 等五个关键变量。其中,前四个 RF 因子足以解释 83.86%、84.27%、84.14% 和 85%的相关矩阵模型精度。最终,目标 TC 显示了约 89% 的总精度。随后,用 RF-WQI 表示所有采样点的水质。得到的数值在 15 到 243 之间,从好水到差水不等。调查的主要发现是,在 8 个水质不达标的地点,河水水质掺假的主要来源是农业径流、非法堆放的城市固体废物和日益恶化的家庭供水。这项工作凸显了整合这些技术来监测和评估河流水质的可行性和可靠性。因此,这些发现对于理解地表水的可持续性以及研究地区的人类消费至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An innovative approach for quality assessment and its contamination on surface water for drinking purpose in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha of India, with the integration of BA-WQI, AHP-TOPSIS, FL-DWQI, MOORA, and RF methodology

Water is essential for life, as it supports bodily functions, nourishes crops, and maintains ecosystems. Drinking water is crucial for maintaining good health and can also contribute to economic development by reducing health-care costs and improving productivity. The present study evaluated the surface water quality of Mahanadi River (Odisha, India). Hence, to evaluate the hydro-chemical processes, sources of contamination, and water quality, a methodical examination was conducted using an integrated approach, namely Bayesian Approximation (BA), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Technique of Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA), and Random Forest (RF) method. For this, water samples from 16 locations were taken for a period of 2018–2024, to test 21 physicochemical parameters in the selected sampling sites. From the assessment of parameters, with respect to WHO standards, pH indicates alkaline, TKN, and TC in all samples surpassed the prescribed drinking water limit. However, major ion and hardness spatial interpolation maps typically show that the quality of the water declines from upstream to downstream, with extreme values found in the downstream. The index for BA-WQI value revealed that 50% of samples belong to unsatisfactory water quality. This was also accompanied by several parameter’s high values, namely TDS, NO3, Cl, and SO42−, which were also highest among all the locations. Again, it is noticed that 12.50% of sites come under the zone of excellent water. However, 37.50% of samples indicated a good water class. As a result, a renowned MCDM model, such as AHP-TOPSIS, was presented, which makes use of rough set theory and Bayesian weights to provide a trustworthy and objective assessment of the total pollution levels at each sample site. Hence, this innovative technique depicted that W-(9) was the most polluted region if compared to other places, followed by W-(8), (16), (2), and (7), respectively. Based on FL-DWQI values, 12.5% of monitored specimens point towards excellent category, and rest 18.75% indicated as good quality. The remaining samples, or 68.75%, consist of ‘poor, very poor, and unsuitable qualities'. However, it was relevant that the degree of pollution at these stations was more closely linked to a variety of expanding human activities, such as excessive water use, fertilizer effects, agricultural runoff, and industrial activity in and around the river corridor. Additionally, MOORA has been conducted and performance scores were extracted. These four polluted sites such as W-(9), (8), (16), and (4), which contain higher performance scores, were 0.89, 0.093, 0.06, and 0.04. The major four places containing variables that exceeded the WHO limits, which account for TKN, coliform, and EC properties, were named accordingly. It was discovered that the main causes of the river’s water quality adulteration were agricultural runoff and home waste water. Furthermore, a RF analysis of the 16 sites was carried out and five critical variables such as Cl, TH, TDS, EC, and TC were obtained on the basis of R2 and RMSE score. Here, the first four RF factors were sufficient to explain 83.86%, 84.27%, 84.14%, and 85% of the model accuracy for correlation matrix. In the end, the target TC suggests about 89% of the total accuracy. Afterwards, water quality at all sampling locations was expressed in terms of RF-WQI. The value obtained varied between 15 and 243, denoting good to poor water. The main finding of the investigation was that at eight inadequate water sites, the main sources of adulteration of the river’s water quality were agricultural runoff, illegally deposited municipal solid waste, and deteriorating household water supplies. This work highlights the viability and dependability of integrating these techniques for monitoring and evaluating river water quality. Hence, these findings are essential for comprehending surface water sustainability, for human consumption in the research area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
A novel hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process–game theory model for prioritizing factors affecting the deterioration of water pipelines Simulation of wheat water footprint using AquaCrop model under the climate change, case study in Qazvin plain An innovative approach for quality assessment and its contamination on surface water for drinking purpose in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha of India, with the integration of BA-WQI, AHP-TOPSIS, FL-DWQI, MOORA, and RF methodology Identifying homogeneous hydrological zones for flood prediction using multivariable statistical methods and machine learning Controlling stormwater at the source: dawn of a new era in integrated water resources management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1