利用 ROTEM 测试对早期阴道出血孕妇进行凝血差异病例对照研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.019
Patrick Maher , Dan Katz , Omara Afzal , Sylviah Nyamu , Lynne D. Richardson
{"title":"利用 ROTEM 测试对早期阴道出血孕妇进行凝血差异病例对照研究。","authors":"Patrick Maher ,&nbsp;Dan Katz ,&nbsp;Omara Afzal ,&nbsp;Sylviah Nyamu ,&nbsp;Lynne D. Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED), often resulting in pregnancy loss. Hypercoagulability exceeding normal physiological changes may be associated with miscarriage, but conventional clotting tests do not reliably detect this effect. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), which performs a more comprehensive clotting evaluation, may demonstrate coagulopathic abnormalities contributing to vaginal bleeding and miscarriage in early pregnancy that are not present in normal gestation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coagulation results from ROTEM testing in patients undergoing active evaluation for possible miscarriage compared to samples taken from asymptomatic patients with healthy pregnancies.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>This was a prospective case control study from a single center. Patients with chief complaint of vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy (less than 20 weeks) were recruited from the ED for ROTEM testing. These results were compared to healthy pregnant women presenting for routine prenatal care at our hospital’s obstetrical clinic. Crude results were analyzed using <em>t</em>-test for ROTEM measures, and differences were then compared using multiple linear regression, controlling for patient age, race, ethnicity, number of prior pregnancies, and estimated gestational age (EGA) in weeks. ROTEM measurements of interest were the clot formation kinetics using EXTEM, INTEM, and NATEM tracings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over the study, 46 patients were recruited from the ED and 51 from the obstetric clinic. Both groups had similar mean ages, and racial and ethnic distribution. ED patients had earlier EGA than OB clinic patients, 7.6 weeks vs. 10.7 weeks, but higher patient age and higher number of prior pregnancies. ROTEM results were not significantly different between groups on univariate analysis except for INTEM CFT and INTEM MCF. After controlling for the patient age and estimated gestational age, no ROTEM result differed between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In pregnant patients presenting to the ED with vaginal bleeding before 20 weeks, ROTEM differences were not different in comparison to healthy pregnant patients at the same gestation stage. This suggests that ROTEM clotting profiles may not be useful in the evaluation of vaginal bleeding within this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case-control study of clotting differences using ROTEM testing in pregnant patients with early vaginal bleeding\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Maher ,&nbsp;Dan Katz ,&nbsp;Omara Afzal ,&nbsp;Sylviah Nyamu ,&nbsp;Lynne D. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED), often resulting in pregnancy loss. Hypercoagulability exceeding normal physiological changes may be associated with miscarriage, but conventional clotting tests do not reliably detect this effect. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), which performs a more comprehensive clotting evaluation, may demonstrate coagulopathic abnormalities contributing to vaginal bleeding and miscarriage in early pregnancy that are not present in normal gestation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coagulation results from ROTEM testing in patients undergoing active evaluation for possible miscarriage compared to samples taken from asymptomatic patients with healthy pregnancies.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>This was a prospective case control study from a single center. Patients with chief complaint of vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy (less than 20 weeks) were recruited from the ED for ROTEM testing. These results were compared to healthy pregnant women presenting for routine prenatal care at our hospital’s obstetrical clinic. Crude results were analyzed using <em>t</em>-test for ROTEM measures, and differences were then compared using multiple linear regression, controlling for patient age, race, ethnicity, number of prior pregnancies, and estimated gestational age (EGA) in weeks. ROTEM measurements of interest were the clot formation kinetics using EXTEM, INTEM, and NATEM tracings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over the study, 46 patients were recruited from the ED and 51 from the obstetric clinic. Both groups had similar mean ages, and racial and ethnic distribution. ED patients had earlier EGA than OB clinic patients, 7.6 weeks vs. 10.7 weeks, but higher patient age and higher number of prior pregnancies. ROTEM results were not significantly different between groups on univariate analysis except for INTEM CFT and INTEM MCF. After controlling for the patient age and estimated gestational age, no ROTEM result differed between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In pregnant patients presenting to the ED with vaginal bleeding before 20 weeks, ROTEM differences were not different in comparison to healthy pregnant patients at the same gestation stage. This suggests that ROTEM clotting profiles may not be useful in the evaluation of vaginal bleeding within this population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"304 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 36-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524006250\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524006250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠早期阴道出血是急诊科(ED)的常见病,通常会导致流产。超过正常生理变化的高凝状态可能与流产有关,但传统的凝血测试并不能可靠地检测出这种影响。旋转血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM)能进行更全面的凝血评估,可显示导致孕早期阴道出血和流产的凝血病理异常,而正常妊娠时并不存在这种异常:本研究旨在评估因可能流产而接受积极评估的患者的 ROTEM 检测结果与健康妊娠的无症状患者样本的凝血结果之间的关系:这是一项来自单一中心的前瞻性病例对照研究。从急诊室招募主诉为早孕期(少于 20 周)阴道出血的患者进行 ROTEM 检测。这些结果与在本医院产科门诊接受常规产前检查的健康孕妇进行了比较。使用 t 检验对 ROTEM 测量的粗略结果进行分析,然后使用多元线性回归对差异进行比较,同时控制患者的年龄、种族、民族、既往妊娠次数和估计孕周(EGA)。ROTEM测量的重点是使用EXTEM、INTEM和NATEM描记的血块形成动力学:在研究过程中,46 名患者来自急诊室,51 名来自产科诊所。两组患者的平均年龄、种族和民族分布相似。急诊科患者的 EGA 早于产科门诊患者,前者为 7.6 周,后者为 10.7 周,但急诊科患者的年龄更大,之前怀孕的次数更多。除 INTEM CFT 和 INTEM MCF 外,ROTEM 结果在单变量分析中各组间无明显差异。在对患者年龄和估计孕龄进行控制后,各组间的 ROTEM 结果均无差异:结论:在 20 周前因阴道出血而到急诊室就诊的孕妇中,ROTEM 结果与相同孕期的健康孕妇相比没有差异。这表明,ROTEM凝血功能图谱在评估这类人群的阴道出血情况时可能并无用处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Case-control study of clotting differences using ROTEM testing in pregnant patients with early vaginal bleeding

Background

Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED), often resulting in pregnancy loss. Hypercoagulability exceeding normal physiological changes may be associated with miscarriage, but conventional clotting tests do not reliably detect this effect. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), which performs a more comprehensive clotting evaluation, may demonstrate coagulopathic abnormalities contributing to vaginal bleeding and miscarriage in early pregnancy that are not present in normal gestation.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coagulation results from ROTEM testing in patients undergoing active evaluation for possible miscarriage compared to samples taken from asymptomatic patients with healthy pregnancies.

Study Design

This was a prospective case control study from a single center. Patients with chief complaint of vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy (less than 20 weeks) were recruited from the ED for ROTEM testing. These results were compared to healthy pregnant women presenting for routine prenatal care at our hospital’s obstetrical clinic. Crude results were analyzed using t-test for ROTEM measures, and differences were then compared using multiple linear regression, controlling for patient age, race, ethnicity, number of prior pregnancies, and estimated gestational age (EGA) in weeks. ROTEM measurements of interest were the clot formation kinetics using EXTEM, INTEM, and NATEM tracings.

Results

Over the study, 46 patients were recruited from the ED and 51 from the obstetric clinic. Both groups had similar mean ages, and racial and ethnic distribution. ED patients had earlier EGA than OB clinic patients, 7.6 weeks vs. 10.7 weeks, but higher patient age and higher number of prior pregnancies. ROTEM results were not significantly different between groups on univariate analysis except for INTEM CFT and INTEM MCF. After controlling for the patient age and estimated gestational age, no ROTEM result differed between groups.

Conclusion

In pregnant patients presenting to the ED with vaginal bleeding before 20 weeks, ROTEM differences were not different in comparison to healthy pregnant patients at the same gestation stage. This suggests that ROTEM clotting profiles may not be useful in the evaluation of vaginal bleeding within this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Inside Back Cover - Editors with images Corrigendum to “Prophylactic tranexamic acid during myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 276 (2022) 82–91] Survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with disease involving the lower uterine segment: A meta-analysis Outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology treatment in infertile women with and without antinuclear antibodies: A prospective cohort study Maternal and neonatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labor with delayed pushing: A study of French Perinatal practices before and after guideline changes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1