Heinz-Josef Lenz, Tianshu Liu, Emerson Y Chen, Zsolt Horváth, Igor Bondarenko, Iwona Danielewicz, Michele Ghidini, Pilar García-Alfonso, Robert Jones, Matti Aapro, Yanqiao Zhang, Jufeng Wang, Wayne Wang, Jennifer Adeleye, Andrew Beelen, Joleen Hubbard
{"title":"用于未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的 FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab 治疗前的 Trilaciclib:3 期 PRESERVE 1 试验。","authors":"Heinz-Josef Lenz, Tianshu Liu, Emerson Y Chen, Zsolt Horváth, Igor Bondarenko, Iwona Danielewicz, Michele Ghidini, Pilar García-Alfonso, Robert Jones, Matti Aapro, Yanqiao Zhang, Jufeng Wang, Wayne Wang, Jennifer Adeleye, Andrew Beelen, Joleen Hubbard","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), improvements in survival from combining leucovorin/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) with bevacizumab have come at the risk of increased rates of high-grade toxicities. Trilaciclib is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1 to trilaciclib (n = 164) or placebo (n = 162) prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for up to 12 cycles (induction), followed by trilaciclib or placebo prior to fluorouracil/leucovorin/bevacizumab (maintenance). Co-primary endpoints were duration of severe (grade 4) neutropenia (DSN) in cycles 1-4 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN) during induction. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy, survival, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: The study met its co-primary endpoints. Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab resulted in significant reductions in DSN in cycles 1-4 versus placebo (mean, 0.1 vs. 1.3 days; P < .001) and occurrence of SN during induction (1.3% vs. 19.7%; adjusted relative risk [96% CI], 0.07 [0.0, 0.3]; P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia, diarrhea, and leukopenia, were less frequent with trilaciclib versus placebo (64.8% vs. 73.1%). Trilaciclib was associated with fewer chemotherapy dose reductions and delays, and reduced administration of supportive therapies, compared with placebo. Objective response rate (41.6% vs. 57.1%; P = .009) and median progression-free survival (10.3 vs. 13.1 months; P < .001) were significantly lower with trilaciclib versus placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab protected the neutrophil lineage from the effects of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. However, antitumor efficacy endpoints favored placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 3 PRESERVE 1 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Heinz-Josef Lenz, Tianshu Liu, Emerson Y Chen, Zsolt Horváth, Igor Bondarenko, Iwona Danielewicz, Michele Ghidini, Pilar García-Alfonso, Robert Jones, Matti Aapro, Yanqiao Zhang, Jufeng Wang, Wayne Wang, Jennifer Adeleye, Andrew Beelen, Joleen Hubbard\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkae116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), improvements in survival from combining leucovorin/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) with bevacizumab have come at the risk of increased rates of high-grade toxicities. Trilaciclib is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1 to trilaciclib (n = 164) or placebo (n = 162) prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for up to 12 cycles (induction), followed by trilaciclib or placebo prior to fluorouracil/leucovorin/bevacizumab (maintenance). Co-primary endpoints were duration of severe (grade 4) neutropenia (DSN) in cycles 1-4 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN) during induction. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy, survival, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: The study met its co-primary endpoints. Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab resulted in significant reductions in DSN in cycles 1-4 versus placebo (mean, 0.1 vs. 1.3 days; P < .001) and occurrence of SN during induction (1.3% vs. 19.7%; adjusted relative risk [96% CI], 0.07 [0.0, 0.3]; P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia, diarrhea, and leukopenia, were less frequent with trilaciclib versus placebo (64.8% vs. 73.1%). Trilaciclib was associated with fewer chemotherapy dose reductions and delays, and reduced administration of supportive therapies, compared with placebo. Objective response rate (41.6% vs. 57.1%; P = .009) and median progression-free survival (10.3 vs. 13.1 months; P < .001) were significantly lower with trilaciclib versus placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab protected the neutrophil lineage from the effects of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. However, antitumor efficacy endpoints favored placebo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中,亮菌甲素/氟尿嘧啶/奥沙利铂/伊立替康(FOLFOXIRI)与贝伐珠单抗联用可提高患者的生存率,但也有可能增加高毒性反应的发生率。Trilaciclib适用于降低接受标准化疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者化疗引起的骨髓抑制发生率:将未经治疗的mCRC患者按1:1随机分组,在FOLFOXIRI/贝伐珠单抗最多12个周期(诱导)前服用曲拉西利布(n = 164)或安慰剂(n = 162),然后在氟尿嘧啶/亮紫杉醇/贝伐珠单抗(维持治疗)前服用曲拉西利布或安慰剂。共主要终点是第1-4周期的严重(4级)中性粒细胞减少症(DSN)持续时间和诱导期间的严重中性粒细胞减少症(SN)发生率。次要终点包括抗肿瘤疗效、生存期和安全性:研究达到了共同主要终点。在FOLFOXIRI/贝伐单抗治疗前服用曲拉西利布可显著减少1-4周期与安慰剂相比的DSN(平均0.1天 vs. 1.3天;P < .001)和诱导期间的SN发生率(1.3% vs. 19.7%;调整相对风险[96% CI],0.07 [0.0, 0.3];P < .001)。曲拉克利与安慰剂相比,3/4级不良事件(包括中性粒细胞减少、腹泻和白细胞减少)发生率较低(64.8% vs. 73.1%)。与安慰剂相比,曲拉西利布导致的化疗剂量减少和延迟以及支持性疗法用药减少的情况更少。与安慰剂相比,trilaciclib的客观反应率(41.6% vs. 57.1%;P = .009)和中位无进展生存期(10.3个月 vs. 13.1个月;P < .001)显著降低:结论:在FOLFOXIRI/贝伐单抗治疗前服用曲拉西利布可保护中性粒细胞免受化疗引起的骨髓抑制的影响。然而,抗肿瘤疗效终点更倾向于安慰剂。
Trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 3 PRESERVE 1 trial.
Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), improvements in survival from combining leucovorin/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) with bevacizumab have come at the risk of increased rates of high-grade toxicities. Trilaciclib is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Methods: Patients with untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1 to trilaciclib (n = 164) or placebo (n = 162) prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for up to 12 cycles (induction), followed by trilaciclib or placebo prior to fluorouracil/leucovorin/bevacizumab (maintenance). Co-primary endpoints were duration of severe (grade 4) neutropenia (DSN) in cycles 1-4 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN) during induction. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy, survival, and safety.
Results: : The study met its co-primary endpoints. Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab resulted in significant reductions in DSN in cycles 1-4 versus placebo (mean, 0.1 vs. 1.3 days; P < .001) and occurrence of SN during induction (1.3% vs. 19.7%; adjusted relative risk [96% CI], 0.07 [0.0, 0.3]; P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia, diarrhea, and leukopenia, were less frequent with trilaciclib versus placebo (64.8% vs. 73.1%). Trilaciclib was associated with fewer chemotherapy dose reductions and delays, and reduced administration of supportive therapies, compared with placebo. Objective response rate (41.6% vs. 57.1%; P = .009) and median progression-free survival (10.3 vs. 13.1 months; P < .001) were significantly lower with trilaciclib versus placebo.
Conclusions: : Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab protected the neutrophil lineage from the effects of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. However, antitumor efficacy endpoints favored placebo.