成人口服酮咯酸的循证安全性概况:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/prp2.70033
Vicente Esparza-Villalpando, Gladys Ortiz-Barroso, David Masuoka-Ito
{"title":"成人口服酮咯酸的循证安全性概况:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Vicente Esparza-Villalpando, Gladys Ortiz-Barroso, David Masuoka-Ito","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective of the present review was to report the safety profile of oral ketorolac in adults using the systematic review and meta-analysis methodology based on clinical trials. The present study is a PRISMA-based systematic review and risk ratio (RR) meta-analysis of the adverse events reported in clinical trials that used oral ketorolac; the review includes 50 clinical trials. The RR for the comparison of a single intake of oral ketorolac versus placebo, including all types of adverse events, was RR = 2.59, IC95% (1.5102; 4.4360) with p = 0.02, the RR for the comparison of a multiple intakes of oral ketorolac versus placebo for all types of adverse events was RR = 1.39, IC95% (0.95; 2.05) with p = 0.093, the RR for the comparison of a single intake of oral ketorolac versus active drugs for all types of adverse events was RR = 0.61, IC95% (0.49; 0.77) with p < 0.0001, the RR for the comparison of multiple intakes of oral ketorolac versus active drugs for all types of adverse events was RR = 0.78, IC95%(0.65; 0.93) with p = 0.006. Multiple intakes of 5, 10, or 20 mg of oral ketorolac, in treatment over 1-10 days, do not increase the risk of adverse events compared to placebo and show a tendency to reduce the risk of adverse events compared to active drugs. When a single intake of ketorolac (5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) is compared to a placebo, the risk increases only for trivial and mild adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"12 6","pages":"e70033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based safety profile of oral ketorolac in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Esparza-Villalpando, Gladys Ortiz-Barroso, David Masuoka-Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prp2.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary objective of the present review was to report the safety profile of oral ketorolac in adults using the systematic review and meta-analysis methodology based on clinical trials. The present study is a PRISMA-based systematic review and risk ratio (RR) meta-analysis of the adverse events reported in clinical trials that used oral ketorolac; the review includes 50 clinical trials. The RR for the comparison of a single intake of oral ketorolac versus placebo, including all types of adverse events, was RR = 2.59, IC95% (1.5102; 4.4360) with p = 0.02, the RR for the comparison of a multiple intakes of oral ketorolac versus placebo for all types of adverse events was RR = 1.39, IC95% (0.95; 2.05) with p = 0.093, the RR for the comparison of a single intake of oral ketorolac versus active drugs for all types of adverse events was RR = 0.61, IC95% (0.49; 0.77) with p < 0.0001, the RR for the comparison of multiple intakes of oral ketorolac versus active drugs for all types of adverse events was RR = 0.78, IC95%(0.65; 0.93) with p = 0.006. Multiple intakes of 5, 10, or 20 mg of oral ketorolac, in treatment over 1-10 days, do not increase the risk of adverse events compared to placebo and show a tendency to reduce the risk of adverse events compared to active drugs. When a single intake of ketorolac (5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) is compared to a placebo, the risk increases only for trivial and mild adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"e70033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述的主要目的是采用基于临床试验的系统综述和荟萃分析方法,报告成人口服酮咯酸的安全性概况。本研究以 PRISMA 为基础,对使用口服酮咯酸的临床试验中报告的不良事件进行了系统回顾和风险比 (RR) 荟萃分析;回顾包括 50 项临床试验。单次摄入口服酮咯酸与安慰剂(包括所有类型的不良事件)比较的 RR 为 RR = 2.59,IC95% (1.5102; 4.4360),P = 0.02;多次摄入口服酮咯酸与安慰剂(包括所有类型的不良事件)比较的 RR 为 RR = 1.39,IC95% (0.95; 2.05),p = 0.093,单次口服酮咯酸与活性药物相比,所有类型不良事件的 RR 为 RR = 0.61,IC95% (0.49; 0.77),p = 0.093,单次口服酮咯酸与活性药物相比,所有类型不良事件的 RR 为 RR = 0.61,IC95% (0.49; 0.77),p = 0.093。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based safety profile of oral ketorolac in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The primary objective of the present review was to report the safety profile of oral ketorolac in adults using the systematic review and meta-analysis methodology based on clinical trials. The present study is a PRISMA-based systematic review and risk ratio (RR) meta-analysis of the adverse events reported in clinical trials that used oral ketorolac; the review includes 50 clinical trials. The RR for the comparison of a single intake of oral ketorolac versus placebo, including all types of adverse events, was RR = 2.59, IC95% (1.5102; 4.4360) with p = 0.02, the RR for the comparison of a multiple intakes of oral ketorolac versus placebo for all types of adverse events was RR = 1.39, IC95% (0.95; 2.05) with p = 0.093, the RR for the comparison of a single intake of oral ketorolac versus active drugs for all types of adverse events was RR = 0.61, IC95% (0.49; 0.77) with p < 0.0001, the RR for the comparison of multiple intakes of oral ketorolac versus active drugs for all types of adverse events was RR = 0.78, IC95%(0.65; 0.93) with p = 0.006. Multiple intakes of 5, 10, or 20 mg of oral ketorolac, in treatment over 1-10 days, do not increase the risk of adverse events compared to placebo and show a tendency to reduce the risk of adverse events compared to active drugs. When a single intake of ketorolac (5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) is compared to a placebo, the risk increases only for trivial and mild adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
期刊最新文献
Differential Impact of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Variability on Response to Combination Therapy. Leveraging Administrative Health Data to Capture Rare Adverse Drug Reactions: Identifying Pediatric Patients With Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Student and Graduate Perceptions of Their Development of the Core Attitudes From the British Pharmacological Society's Undergraduate Pharmacology Curriculum. Promoting Sustainable Prescribing-A Case Study Presenting Experiences From Two Swedish Drug and Therapeutics Committees. Alterations in Abdominal Blood Flows After Drinking Coffee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1