使用 Felder-Silverman 学习风格模型的分组干预对护理专业学生基于问题的学习的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106489
Yifan Wu, Dongpo Song, Yueyang Dong, Qiqing Zhong, Shizheng Gao, Juanjuan Sun, Shuyan Fang, Shengze Zhi, Rui Wang, Jiao Sun
{"title":"使用 Felder-Silverman 学习风格模型的分组干预对护理专业学生基于问题的学习的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Yifan Wu, Dongpo Song, Yueyang Dong, Qiqing Zhong, Shizheng Gao, Juanjuan Sun, Shuyan Fang, Shengze Zhi, Rui Wang, Jiao Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Problem-Based Learning (PBL) education can improve nursing students' thinking skills and overall quality of life, but its effectiveness depends largely on the level of student engagement within the group. Finding an intervention to increase nursing students' classroom engagement is critical to improving learning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the impact of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLSM) on PBL in nursing education, including classroom engagement, critical thinking, self-directed learning skills, and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center, single-blind, double-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>One university school of nursing.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample consisted of 56 fourth-year undergraduate nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students were randomly assigned to experimental group (n = 28) and control group (n = 28). The experimental group received PBL education based on FSLSM grouping and control group received traditional PBL education. Data collection was done using Demographic questionnaire, Index of Learning Style scale, Classroom Engagement Questionnaire for Students, Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version, and Self-Directed Learning Skill scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-test, independent t-test, and chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FSLSM-based grouping significantly enhanced classroom engagement and critical thinking in the experimental group compared to the control group. While both groups improved in self-directed learning skills, the experimental group showed greater gains in learning motivation and information quality. However, academic performance did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating the FSLSM with PBL can potentially optimize educational outcomes in nursing, emphasizing the importance of individual learning styles in group-based learning environments.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300069565).</p>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"145 ","pages":"106489"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman learning style model on problem-based learning among nursing students: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yifan Wu, Dongpo Song, Yueyang Dong, Qiqing Zhong, Shizheng Gao, Juanjuan Sun, Shuyan Fang, Shengze Zhi, Rui Wang, Jiao Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Problem-Based Learning (PBL) education can improve nursing students' thinking skills and overall quality of life, but its effectiveness depends largely on the level of student engagement within the group. Finding an intervention to increase nursing students' classroom engagement is critical to improving learning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the impact of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLSM) on PBL in nursing education, including classroom engagement, critical thinking, self-directed learning skills, and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center, single-blind, double-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>One university school of nursing.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample consisted of 56 fourth-year undergraduate nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students were randomly assigned to experimental group (n = 28) and control group (n = 28). The experimental group received PBL education based on FSLSM grouping and control group received traditional PBL education. Data collection was done using Demographic questionnaire, Index of Learning Style scale, Classroom Engagement Questionnaire for Students, Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version, and Self-Directed Learning Skill scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-test, independent t-test, and chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FSLSM-based grouping significantly enhanced classroom engagement and critical thinking in the experimental group compared to the control group. While both groups improved in self-directed learning skills, the experimental group showed greater gains in learning motivation and information quality. However, academic performance did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating the FSLSM with PBL can potentially optimize educational outcomes in nursing, emphasizing the importance of individual learning styles in group-based learning environments.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300069565).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"106489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于问题的学习(PBL)教育可以提高护理专业学生的思维能力和整体素质,但其效果在很大程度上取决于学生在小组内的参与程度。找到提高护理专业学生课堂参与度的干预措施对于提高学习效果至关重要:目的:探讨使用 Felder-Silverman 学习风格模型(FSLSM)进行分组干预对护理教育中的 PBL 的影响,包括课堂参与度、批判性思维、自主学习技能和学习成绩:设计:单中心、单盲、双臂、平行随机对照试验:环境:一所大学护理学院:方法:学生被随机分配到实验组和对照组:学生被随机分配到实验组(28 人)和对照组(28 人)。实验组接受基于 FSLSM 分组的 PBL 教育,对照组接受传统的 PBL 教育。数据收集采用了人口统计学问卷、学习风格指数量表、学生课堂参与度问卷、批判性思维倾向量表(中文版)和自主学习技能量表。数据分析采用描述性统计、配对 t 检验、独立 t 检验和卡方检验:结果:与对照组相比,基于 FSLSM 的分组明显提高了实验组学生的课堂参与度和批判性思维能力。虽然两组学生的自主学习能力都有所提高,但实验组在学习动机和信息质量方面的进步更大。然而,两组的学习成绩并无明显差异:结论:将 FSLSM 与 PBL 相结合有可能优化护理学的教学成果,强调了在基于小组的学习环境中个人学习风格的重要性:该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300069565)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman learning style model on problem-based learning among nursing students: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) education can improve nursing students' thinking skills and overall quality of life, but its effectiveness depends largely on the level of student engagement within the group. Finding an intervention to increase nursing students' classroom engagement is critical to improving learning outcomes.

Objectives: To explore the impact of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLSM) on PBL in nursing education, including classroom engagement, critical thinking, self-directed learning skills, and academic performance.

Design: A single-center, single-blind, double-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial.

Settings: One university school of nursing.

Participants: The sample consisted of 56 fourth-year undergraduate nursing students.

Methods: Students were randomly assigned to experimental group (n = 28) and control group (n = 28). The experimental group received PBL education based on FSLSM grouping and control group received traditional PBL education. Data collection was done using Demographic questionnaire, Index of Learning Style scale, Classroom Engagement Questionnaire for Students, Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version, and Self-Directed Learning Skill scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-test, independent t-test, and chi-square test.

Results: The FSLSM-based grouping significantly enhanced classroom engagement and critical thinking in the experimental group compared to the control group. While both groups improved in self-directed learning skills, the experimental group showed greater gains in learning motivation and information quality. However, academic performance did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Integrating the FSLSM with PBL can potentially optimize educational outcomes in nursing, emphasizing the importance of individual learning styles in group-based learning environments.

Registration: The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300069565).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
International nursing students' culture shock and academic engagement: The moderating role of resilience. Effects of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman learning style model on problem-based learning among nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. Exploring nurse educators' preparation of clinical nurses and midwives for research utilization in practice: A qualitative study. Bachelor nursing competencies to care for children in hospital and home settings: A Delphi study. Developing an instrument to measure nurses' attitudes towards nursing students during clinical practice: A quantitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1