医生为何在心脏骤停时使用碳酸氢钠?一项针对成人和儿科临床医生的横断面调查研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100830
Catherine E. Ross , Jill L. Sorcher , Ryan Gardner , Ameeka Pannu , Monica E. Kleinman , Michael W. Donnino , Amy M. Sullivan , Margaret M. Hayes
{"title":"医生为何在心脏骤停时使用碳酸氢钠?一项针对成人和儿科临床医生的横断面调查研究","authors":"Catherine E. Ross ,&nbsp;Jill L. Sorcher ,&nbsp;Ryan Gardner ,&nbsp;Ameeka Pannu ,&nbsp;Monica E. Kleinman ,&nbsp;Michael W. Donnino ,&nbsp;Amy M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Margaret M. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite recommendations against routine use, sodium bicarbonate (SB) is administered in approximately 50% of adult and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional electronic survey of adult and pediatric attending physicians at two academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. The survey included two IHCA vignettes. Additional open- and closed-ended items explored clinician beliefs surrounding intra-arrest SB and perspectives on a hypothetical clinical trial comparing SB with placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 356 physicians invited, 224 (63 %) responded. Of these, 54 (24 %) said they would “probably” or “definitely give” SB in Scenario 1 (10-minute asystolic arrest) compared to 110 (49 %) for Scenario 2 (20-minute asystolic arrest; p &lt; 0.001). The most frequently reported indications for SB were: hyperkalemia (78 %); metabolic acidosis (76 %); tricyclic anti-depressant overdose (71 %); and prolonged arrest duration (64 %). Of the 207 (92 %) respondents who reported using intra-arrest SB in at least some circumstances, the most common reasons for use were: “last ditch effort” in a prolonged arrest (75 %) and belief that there were physiologic benefits (63 %). When asked of the importance of a clinical trial to guide intra-arrest SB use, 188 (84 %) respondents felt it was at least of average importance, and 140 (63 %) said they would be “somewhat” or “very comfortable” enrolling patients in a trial comparing SB and placebo in IHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Physicians reported practice variations surrounding cardiac arrest management with SB. Respondents commonly cited metabolic acidosis and prolonged arrest duration as indications for intra-arrest SB, despite not being supported by the American Heart Association’s advanced life support guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why physicians use sodium bicarbonate during cardiac arrest: A cross-sectional survey study of adult and pediatric clinicians\",\"authors\":\"Catherine E. Ross ,&nbsp;Jill L. Sorcher ,&nbsp;Ryan Gardner ,&nbsp;Ameeka Pannu ,&nbsp;Monica E. Kleinman ,&nbsp;Michael W. Donnino ,&nbsp;Amy M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Margaret M. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite recommendations against routine use, sodium bicarbonate (SB) is administered in approximately 50% of adult and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional electronic survey of adult and pediatric attending physicians at two academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. The survey included two IHCA vignettes. Additional open- and closed-ended items explored clinician beliefs surrounding intra-arrest SB and perspectives on a hypothetical clinical trial comparing SB with placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 356 physicians invited, 224 (63 %) responded. Of these, 54 (24 %) said they would “probably” or “definitely give” SB in Scenario 1 (10-minute asystolic arrest) compared to 110 (49 %) for Scenario 2 (20-minute asystolic arrest; p &lt; 0.001). The most frequently reported indications for SB were: hyperkalemia (78 %); metabolic acidosis (76 %); tricyclic anti-depressant overdose (71 %); and prolonged arrest duration (64 %). Of the 207 (92 %) respondents who reported using intra-arrest SB in at least some circumstances, the most common reasons for use were: “last ditch effort” in a prolonged arrest (75 %) and belief that there were physiologic benefits (63 %). When asked of the importance of a clinical trial to guide intra-arrest SB use, 188 (84 %) respondents felt it was at least of average importance, and 140 (63 %) said they would be “somewhat” or “very comfortable” enrolling patients in a trial comparing SB and placebo in IHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Physicians reported practice variations surrounding cardiac arrest management with SB. Respondents commonly cited metabolic acidosis and prolonged arrest duration as indications for intra-arrest SB, despite not being supported by the American Heart Association’s advanced life support guidelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管建议不要常规使用碳酸氢钠 (SB),但仍有约 50% 的成人和儿童院内心脏骤停 (IHCA) 患者使用碳酸氢钠 (SB)。调查包括两个 IHCA 小故事。附加的开放式和封闭式条目探讨了临床医生对心肺复苏术的看法,以及对比较心肺复苏术和安慰剂的假想临床试验的观点。 结果 在受邀的 356 名医生中,有 224 人(63%)做出了回应。其中 54 人(24%)表示他们 "可能 "或 "肯定 "会在情景 1(10 分钟收缩期骤停)中进行 SB,而在情景 2(20 分钟收缩期骤停;P < 0.001)中则为 110 人(49%)。最常报告的 SB 适应症是:高钾血症(78%)、代谢性酸中毒(76%)、三环类抗抑郁药过量(71%)和停搏时间延长(64%)。207 名受访者(92%)表示至少在某些情况下使用过逮捕中的 SB,其中最常见的使用原因包括"最后一搏"(75%)和认为有生理益处(63%)。当被问及临床试验对指导心跳骤停时使用 SB 的重要性时,188 名受访者(84%)认为至少具有一般的重要性,140 名受访者(63%)表示他们会 "比较愿意 "或 "非常愿意 "让患者参加在 IHCA 中比较 SB 和安慰剂的试验。受访者通常将代谢性酸中毒和停搏时间延长作为停搏中使用 SB 的指征,尽管美国心脏协会的高级生命支持指南并不支持这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why physicians use sodium bicarbonate during cardiac arrest: A cross-sectional survey study of adult and pediatric clinicians

Background

Despite recommendations against routine use, sodium bicarbonate (SB) is administered in approximately 50% of adult and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).

Methods

Cross-sectional electronic survey of adult and pediatric attending physicians at two academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. The survey included two IHCA vignettes. Additional open- and closed-ended items explored clinician beliefs surrounding intra-arrest SB and perspectives on a hypothetical clinical trial comparing SB with placebo.

Results

Of the 356 physicians invited, 224 (63 %) responded. Of these, 54 (24 %) said they would “probably” or “definitely give” SB in Scenario 1 (10-minute asystolic arrest) compared to 110 (49 %) for Scenario 2 (20-minute asystolic arrest; p < 0.001). The most frequently reported indications for SB were: hyperkalemia (78 %); metabolic acidosis (76 %); tricyclic anti-depressant overdose (71 %); and prolonged arrest duration (64 %). Of the 207 (92 %) respondents who reported using intra-arrest SB in at least some circumstances, the most common reasons for use were: “last ditch effort” in a prolonged arrest (75 %) and belief that there were physiologic benefits (63 %). When asked of the importance of a clinical trial to guide intra-arrest SB use, 188 (84 %) respondents felt it was at least of average importance, and 140 (63 %) said they would be “somewhat” or “very comfortable” enrolling patients in a trial comparing SB and placebo in IHCA.

Conclusions

Physicians reported practice variations surrounding cardiac arrest management with SB. Respondents commonly cited metabolic acidosis and prolonged arrest duration as indications for intra-arrest SB, despite not being supported by the American Heart Association’s advanced life support guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
In-hospital cardiac arrest in middle-income settings: A comprehensive analysis of clinical profiles and outcomes of both adults and pediatrics. Hand position during chest compression in infantile piglets - Do you need to encircle the chest with the 2-thumb-technique? ILCOR World Restart a Heart - Spreading global CPR awareness and empowering communities to save lives since 2018. Challenges during cardiac arrest in pregnancy. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Ireland 2012 to 2020: Bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation and survival in the Utstein comparator group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1