中风康复后功能改善的预测模型

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurorestoratology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100157
Xue Yang , Qian Liu , Hongmei Zhang, Yihuan Lu, Liqing Yao
{"title":"中风康复后功能改善的预测模型","authors":"Xue Yang ,&nbsp;Qian Liu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Zhang,&nbsp;Yihuan Lu,&nbsp;Liqing Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study develops a simple predictive model for identifying stroke patients who have a better chance of showing improved activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes following a stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cohort of 489 stroke patients was divided into testing and training groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for each model. Four models were compared using the C statistic (AUC), Akaike's information criterion (AIC), and other metrics. The best model was assessed using a nomogram.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Univariate analysis revealed that several variables measured significantly higher at discharge than at admission, including manual muscle testing, standing, and so on. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that activities-specific balance confidence, Brunnstrom recovery stage for lower extremities, standing, the mini-balance evaluation systems test, and the Hamilton anxiety scale were independent predictors of ADL. Model 1 was found to be more accurate for the prediction of ADL (AUC: training, 0.916 [0.889−0.943] and test, 0.887 [0.806−0.968]; AIC: training, 257.42 and test, 76.79) than model 2 (AUC: training, 0.850 [0.894−0.806] and test, 0.819 [0.715−0.923]; AIC: training, 314.44 and test, 83.78), model 3 (AUC: training, 0.862 [0.901−0.823] and test, 0.830 [0.731−0.929]; AIC: training, 307.76 and test, 86.55), and model 4 (AUC: training, 0.862 [0.901−0.823] and test, 0.833 [0.733−0.932]; AIC: training, 305.8 and test, 86.28).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A multivariate model can be used to predict functionality improvement, as measured by ADL, following hospitalization with a stroke.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A predictive model for functionality improvement after stroke rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Xue Yang ,&nbsp;Qian Liu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Zhang,&nbsp;Yihuan Lu,&nbsp;Liqing Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study develops a simple predictive model for identifying stroke patients who have a better chance of showing improved activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes following a stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cohort of 489 stroke patients was divided into testing and training groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for each model. Four models were compared using the C statistic (AUC), Akaike's information criterion (AIC), and other metrics. The best model was assessed using a nomogram.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Univariate analysis revealed that several variables measured significantly higher at discharge than at admission, including manual muscle testing, standing, and so on. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that activities-specific balance confidence, Brunnstrom recovery stage for lower extremities, standing, the mini-balance evaluation systems test, and the Hamilton anxiety scale were independent predictors of ADL. Model 1 was found to be more accurate for the prediction of ADL (AUC: training, 0.916 [0.889−0.943] and test, 0.887 [0.806−0.968]; AIC: training, 257.42 and test, 76.79) than model 2 (AUC: training, 0.850 [0.894−0.806] and test, 0.819 [0.715−0.923]; AIC: training, 314.44 and test, 83.78), model 3 (AUC: training, 0.862 [0.901−0.823] and test, 0.830 [0.731−0.929]; AIC: training, 307.76 and test, 86.55), and model 4 (AUC: training, 0.862 [0.901−0.823] and test, 0.833 [0.733−0.932]; AIC: training, 305.8 and test, 86.28).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A multivariate model can be used to predict functionality improvement, as measured by ADL, following hospitalization with a stroke.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurorestoratology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurorestoratology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242624000640\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242624000640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究建立了一个简单的预测模型,用于识别中风后日常生活活动(ADL)改善机会更大的中风患者。方法将 489 名中风患者分为测试组和训练组。每个模型都进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。使用 C 统计量(AUC)、阿凯克信息准则(AIC)和其他指标对四个模型进行比较。结果多元分析显示,出院时测量的几个变量明显高于入院时测量的变量,包括手动肌肉测试、站立等。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,特定活动平衡信心、下肢布伦斯特罗姆恢复阶段、站立、迷你平衡评估系统测试和汉密尔顿焦虑量表是ADL的独立预测指标。结果发现,模型 1 对 ADL 的预测更为准确(AUC:训练为 0.916 [0.889-0.943],测试为 0.887 [0.806-0.968];AIC:训练为 257.42,测试为 76.79)高于模型 2(AUC:训练,0.850 [0.894-0.806],测试,0.819 [0.715-0.923];AIC:训练,314.44,测试,83.78)、模型 3(AUC:训练,0.862 [0.901-0.结论多变量模型可用于预测脑卒中住院后以 ADL 衡量的功能改善情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A predictive model for functionality improvement after stroke rehabilitation

Background

This study develops a simple predictive model for identifying stroke patients who have a better chance of showing improved activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes following a stroke.

Methods

The cohort of 489 stroke patients was divided into testing and training groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for each model. Four models were compared using the C statistic (AUC), Akaike's information criterion (AIC), and other metrics. The best model was assessed using a nomogram.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed that several variables measured significantly higher at discharge than at admission, including manual muscle testing, standing, and so on. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that activities-specific balance confidence, Brunnstrom recovery stage for lower extremities, standing, the mini-balance evaluation systems test, and the Hamilton anxiety scale were independent predictors of ADL. Model 1 was found to be more accurate for the prediction of ADL (AUC: training, 0.916 [0.889−0.943] and test, 0.887 [0.806−0.968]; AIC: training, 257.42 and test, 76.79) than model 2 (AUC: training, 0.850 [0.894−0.806] and test, 0.819 [0.715−0.923]; AIC: training, 314.44 and test, 83.78), model 3 (AUC: training, 0.862 [0.901−0.823] and test, 0.830 [0.731−0.929]; AIC: training, 307.76 and test, 86.55), and model 4 (AUC: training, 0.862 [0.901−0.823] and test, 0.833 [0.733−0.932]; AIC: training, 305.8 and test, 86.28).

Conclusion

A multivariate model can be used to predict functionality improvement, as measured by ADL, following hospitalization with a stroke.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Journal of Neurorestoratology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Analysis of causal relationship between immune cells and intracranial aneurysm: A mendelian randomization study Authors’ response to correspondence regarding “Application of deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke neurorestoration: A review” Response to the Letter from Dr. Li et al. for “Two Sides of One Coin: Neurorestoratology and Neurorehabilitation” Letter to Editor: Correspondence to "Two sides of one coin: Neurorestoratology and Neurorehabilitation"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1