从自愿到强制实施:绿色信贷政策对中国 "去僵尸化 "的影响

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108045
Ruipeng Tan , Wenjun Zhu , Mengmeng Xu , Zixuan Zhang
{"title":"从自愿到强制实施:绿色信贷政策对中国 \"去僵尸化 \"的影响","authors":"Ruipeng Tan ,&nbsp;Wenjun Zhu ,&nbsp;Mengmeng Xu ,&nbsp;Zixuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the influence of the green credit policy on firm de-zombification in China using the listed firm samples. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the efficacy of two distinct policy implementation methods within the green credit policy framework. The results reveal that the implementation of the Green Credit Guidelines does not yield a statistically significant improvement in the de-zombification of green credit-restricted firms if they are implemented voluntarily. Only by including green credit performance in the assessment of bank officials, the de-zombification of such firms can be markedly promoted. Overall, the green credit policy acts as a catalyst for de-zombification by exerting dual effects: aggravating financial constraints and stimulating green innovation. The positive effect of green credit policy on de-zombification mainly comes from SOEs, firms with weak external supervision and firms located in areas with a lower degree of marketization. The results of the empirical study offer crucial insights for policymaking in China. It is imperative for the Chinese government to continue adhering to and further enhancing the green credit policy, with a particular focus on mandatory measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108045"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From voluntary to mandatory implementation: The impact of green credit policy on de-zombification in China\",\"authors\":\"Ruipeng Tan ,&nbsp;Wenjun Zhu ,&nbsp;Mengmeng Xu ,&nbsp;Zixuan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the influence of the green credit policy on firm de-zombification in China using the listed firm samples. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the efficacy of two distinct policy implementation methods within the green credit policy framework. The results reveal that the implementation of the Green Credit Guidelines does not yield a statistically significant improvement in the de-zombification of green credit-restricted firms if they are implemented voluntarily. Only by including green credit performance in the assessment of bank officials, the de-zombification of such firms can be markedly promoted. Overall, the green credit policy acts as a catalyst for de-zombification by exerting dual effects: aggravating financial constraints and stimulating green innovation. The positive effect of green credit policy on de-zombification mainly comes from SOEs, firms with weak external supervision and firms located in areas with a lower degree of marketization. The results of the empirical study offer crucial insights for policymaking in China. It is imperative for the Chinese government to continue adhering to and further enhancing the green credit policy, with a particular focus on mandatory measures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007540\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以中国上市公司为样本,探讨了绿色信贷政策对企业去僵尸化的影响。本文比较分析了绿色信贷政策框架下两种不同政策实施方法的效果。结果表明,如果自愿实施《绿色信贷指引》,则对绿色信贷限制企业去僵尸化的改善并无统计学意义。只有将绿色信贷绩效纳入银行官员的评估,才能明显促进这类企业的去僵尸化。总体而言,绿色信贷政策通过发挥双重效应:加剧金融约束和刺激绿色创新,成为去僵尸化的催化剂。绿色信贷政策对去僵尸化的积极作用主要来自国有企业、外部监管薄弱的企业和市场化程度较低地区的企业。实证研究的结果为中国的政策制定提供了重要启示。中国政府有必要继续坚持并进一步加强绿色信贷政策,尤其要重视强制性措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From voluntary to mandatory implementation: The impact of green credit policy on de-zombification in China
This study investigates the influence of the green credit policy on firm de-zombification in China using the listed firm samples. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the efficacy of two distinct policy implementation methods within the green credit policy framework. The results reveal that the implementation of the Green Credit Guidelines does not yield a statistically significant improvement in the de-zombification of green credit-restricted firms if they are implemented voluntarily. Only by including green credit performance in the assessment of bank officials, the de-zombification of such firms can be markedly promoted. Overall, the green credit policy acts as a catalyst for de-zombification by exerting dual effects: aggravating financial constraints and stimulating green innovation. The positive effect of green credit policy on de-zombification mainly comes from SOEs, firms with weak external supervision and firms located in areas with a lower degree of marketization. The results of the empirical study offer crucial insights for policymaking in China. It is imperative for the Chinese government to continue adhering to and further enhancing the green credit policy, with a particular focus on mandatory measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Economical driving and taxation of road use Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals Digitizing energy supply chains for enhanced resilience: Exploring the nexus between supply chain digitization, carbon neutrality, and natural resource extraction Integrating renewable energy resources in electricity distribution systems—A firm-level efficiency analysis for Sweden controlling for weather conditions Determining the profitability of energy storage over its life cycle using levelized cost of storage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1