{"title":"旨在培养学生批判性思维的同伴反馈的设计、实施和评估:2010 年至 2023 年的系统回顾","authors":"Xiaomeng Zeng , Latha Ravindran","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peer feedback, as one of the assessment techniques to develop critical thinking is now receiving more attention. Due to different instruction design factors in peer feedback, it is not that widely used. This systematic review analyzed studies using peer feedback to develop critical thinking from Web of Science and Scopus within the duration of 2010 to 2023. Through a systematic process of paper selection, the study selected 44 empirical studies in practical teaching. Generally, most studies used existing definitions of critical thinking in general knowledge, whereas most studies used multiple scaffolding to help learners understand and develop critical thinking in specific disciplines. The cooperative nature of peer feedback with the provision and reception of feedback between learners brings significant improvement in thinking. The review thus proposed an operational framework of critical thinking, as well as an instructional design of peer feedback to promote the development of critical thinking in global teaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design, implementation, and evaluation of peer feedback to develop students’ critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2023\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomeng Zeng , Latha Ravindran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Peer feedback, as one of the assessment techniques to develop critical thinking is now receiving more attention. Due to different instruction design factors in peer feedback, it is not that widely used. This systematic review analyzed studies using peer feedback to develop critical thinking from Web of Science and Scopus within the duration of 2010 to 2023. Through a systematic process of paper selection, the study selected 44 empirical studies in practical teaching. Generally, most studies used existing definitions of critical thinking in general knowledge, whereas most studies used multiple scaffolding to help learners understand and develop critical thinking in specific disciplines. The cooperative nature of peer feedback with the provision and reception of feedback between learners brings significant improvement in thinking. The review thus proposed an operational framework of critical thinking, as well as an instructional design of peer feedback to promote the development of critical thinking in global teaching.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002293\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
同伴反馈作为培养批判性思维的评价技术之一,目前正受到越来越多的关注。由于同伴反馈的教学设计因素不同,其应用并不广泛。本系统性综述分析了 2010 年至 2023 年期间来自 Web of Science 和 Scopus 的利用同伴反馈培养批判性思维的研究。通过系统的论文筛选过程,本研究选取了 44 篇实践教学方面的实证研究。一般来说,大多数研究使用了常识中关于批判性思维的现有定义,而大多数研究使用了多种支架来帮助学习者理解和发展特定学科的批判性思维。通过学习者之间提供和接受反馈,同伴反馈的合作性质显著提高了思维能力。因此,综述提出了批判性思维的操作框架以及同伴反馈的教学设计,以促进全球教学中批判性思维的发展。
Design, implementation, and evaluation of peer feedback to develop students’ critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2023
Peer feedback, as one of the assessment techniques to develop critical thinking is now receiving more attention. Due to different instruction design factors in peer feedback, it is not that widely used. This systematic review analyzed studies using peer feedback to develop critical thinking from Web of Science and Scopus within the duration of 2010 to 2023. Through a systematic process of paper selection, the study selected 44 empirical studies in practical teaching. Generally, most studies used existing definitions of critical thinking in general knowledge, whereas most studies used multiple scaffolding to help learners understand and develop critical thinking in specific disciplines. The cooperative nature of peer feedback with the provision and reception of feedback between learners brings significant improvement in thinking. The review thus proposed an operational framework of critical thinking, as well as an instructional design of peer feedback to promote the development of critical thinking in global teaching.
期刊介绍:
Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.