胰岛素对年轻人脑血流指标和脑血管顺应性的影响

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00668.2024
Brian Shariffi, Jennifer L Harper, Neil J McMillan, Anna M Gonsalves, Braden J Bond, Aubrey M Pipkins, Leena N Shoemaker, Camila Manrique-Acevedo, Jaume Padilla, Jacqueline K Limberg
{"title":"胰岛素对年轻人脑血流指标和脑血管顺应性的影响","authors":"Brian Shariffi, Jennifer L Harper, Neil J McMillan, Anna M Gonsalves, Braden J Bond, Aubrey M Pipkins, Leena N Shoemaker, Camila Manrique-Acevedo, Jaume Padilla, Jacqueline K Limberg","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.00668.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about insulin's role in cerebrovascular control. Herein, we hypothesized both systemic (intravenous) and local (intranasal) insulin administration would increase indices of cerebral blood flow and reduce cerebrovascular compliance (Ci) in young adults. Participants were assigned to one of four separate protocols. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler ultrasound) and blood pressure (BP, finger photoplethysmography) were measured at baseline and at <i>1</i>) 2 min of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) air breathing (high flow control), <i>2</i>) 60 min of euglycemic intravenous insulin infusion (40 mU/m<sup>2</sup> body surface area/min), <i>3</i>) 60 min following 160 IU of intranasal insulin, <i>4</i>) 60 minutes of time control. Ci was calculated (modified Windkessel model). Intravenous insulin increased serum insulin (6.0 ± 2.6 to 52.7 ± 12.7 μIU/mL, <i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas serum insulin was reduced following intranasal insulin (6.9 ± 4.5 to 4.9 ± 1.8 μIU/mL, <i>P</i> = 0.030). MCAv increased in response to CO<sub>2</sub> (60 ± 13 to 69 ± 11 cm/s, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but was unchanged with time control (50 ± 7 to 49 ± 8, <i>P</i> = 0.658) and both insulin conditions (intravenous: 61 ± 13 to 62 ± 17 cm/s, <i>P</i> = 0.531; intranasal: 57 ± 12 to 51 ± 15 cm/s; <i>p</i> = 0.061). In contrast, Ci remained at baseline levels over time (<i>P</i> = 0.438) and was reduced from baseline under CO<sub>2</sub> and both insulin conditions (CO<sub>2</sub>, <i>P</i> < 0.001; intravenous, <i>P</i> = 0.021; intranasal, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of systemic or local insulin administration on resting MCAv in young adults; however, both systemic and local insulin administration reduced Ci. These findings advance our understanding of the cerebrovascular response to acute insulin exposure.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about the role of insulin in cerebrovascular control. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of systemic (intravenous) nor local (intranasal) insulin administration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity; however, both systemic and local insulin administration reduced cerebrovascular compliance. Our findings advance our understanding of the cerebrovascular response to insulin and may have implications in the context of known metabolic disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":7692,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","volume":" ","pages":"H21-H28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of insulin on indices of cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular compliance in young adults.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Shariffi, Jennifer L Harper, Neil J McMillan, Anna M Gonsalves, Braden J Bond, Aubrey M Pipkins, Leena N Shoemaker, Camila Manrique-Acevedo, Jaume Padilla, Jacqueline K Limberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajpheart.00668.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about insulin's role in cerebrovascular control. Herein, we hypothesized both systemic (intravenous) and local (intranasal) insulin administration would increase indices of cerebral blood flow and reduce cerebrovascular compliance (Ci) in young adults. Participants were assigned to one of four separate protocols. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler ultrasound) and blood pressure (BP, finger photoplethysmography) were measured at baseline and at <i>1</i>) 2 min of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) air breathing (high flow control), <i>2</i>) 60 min of euglycemic intravenous insulin infusion (40 mU/m<sup>2</sup> body surface area/min), <i>3</i>) 60 min following 160 IU of intranasal insulin, <i>4</i>) 60 minutes of time control. Ci was calculated (modified Windkessel model). Intravenous insulin increased serum insulin (6.0 ± 2.6 to 52.7 ± 12.7 μIU/mL, <i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas serum insulin was reduced following intranasal insulin (6.9 ± 4.5 to 4.9 ± 1.8 μIU/mL, <i>P</i> = 0.030). MCAv increased in response to CO<sub>2</sub> (60 ± 13 to 69 ± 11 cm/s, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but was unchanged with time control (50 ± 7 to 49 ± 8, <i>P</i> = 0.658) and both insulin conditions (intravenous: 61 ± 13 to 62 ± 17 cm/s, <i>P</i> = 0.531; intranasal: 57 ± 12 to 51 ± 15 cm/s; <i>p</i> = 0.061). In contrast, Ci remained at baseline levels over time (<i>P</i> = 0.438) and was reduced from baseline under CO<sub>2</sub> and both insulin conditions (CO<sub>2</sub>, <i>P</i> < 0.001; intravenous, <i>P</i> = 0.021; intranasal, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of systemic or local insulin administration on resting MCAv in young adults; however, both systemic and local insulin administration reduced Ci. These findings advance our understanding of the cerebrovascular response to acute insulin exposure.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about the role of insulin in cerebrovascular control. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of systemic (intravenous) nor local (intranasal) insulin administration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity; however, both systemic and local insulin administration reduced cerebrovascular compliance. Our findings advance our understanding of the cerebrovascular response to insulin and may have implications in the context of known metabolic disturbances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"H21-H28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00668.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00668.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胰岛素在外周循环中具有重要的血管扩张作用,但人们对胰岛素在脑血管控制中的作用却知之甚少。在此,我们假设全身(静脉注射)和局部(鼻内注射)胰岛素给药会增加年轻成年人的脑血流量指数并降低脑血管顺应性(Ci)。参与者被分配到四个不同方案中的一个。在基线和1)2分钟二氧化碳(CO2)空气呼吸(高流量控制)、2)60分钟优降糖静脉注射胰岛素(40 mU/m2体表面积/分钟)、3)60分钟160 IU胰岛素鼻内注射、4)60分钟时间控制时测量大脑中动脉血流速度(MCAv,经颅多普勒超声)和血压(BP,手指光电血压计)。计算 Ci(改良 Windkessel 模型)。静脉注射胰岛素增加了血清胰岛素(6.0±2.6 至 52.7±12.7 μIU/mL,p2(60±13 至 69±11 cm/s,p2 和两种胰岛素条件(CO2,p2))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of insulin on indices of cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular compliance in young adults.

Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about insulin's role in cerebrovascular control. Herein, we hypothesized both systemic (intravenous) and local (intranasal) insulin administration would increase indices of cerebral blood flow and reduce cerebrovascular compliance (Ci) in young adults. Participants were assigned to one of four separate protocols. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler ultrasound) and blood pressure (BP, finger photoplethysmography) were measured at baseline and at 1) 2 min of carbon dioxide (CO2) air breathing (high flow control), 2) 60 min of euglycemic intravenous insulin infusion (40 mU/m2 body surface area/min), 3) 60 min following 160 IU of intranasal insulin, 4) 60 minutes of time control. Ci was calculated (modified Windkessel model). Intravenous insulin increased serum insulin (6.0 ± 2.6 to 52.7 ± 12.7 μIU/mL, P < 0.001), whereas serum insulin was reduced following intranasal insulin (6.9 ± 4.5 to 4.9 ± 1.8 μIU/mL, P = 0.030). MCAv increased in response to CO2 (60 ± 13 to 69 ± 11 cm/s, P < 0.001) but was unchanged with time control (50 ± 7 to 49 ± 8, P = 0.658) and both insulin conditions (intravenous: 61 ± 13 to 62 ± 17 cm/s, P = 0.531; intranasal: 57 ± 12 to 51 ± 15 cm/s; p = 0.061). In contrast, Ci remained at baseline levels over time (P = 0.438) and was reduced from baseline under CO2 and both insulin conditions (CO2, P < 0.001; intravenous, P = 0.021; intranasal, P = 0.001). Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of systemic or local insulin administration on resting MCAv in young adults; however, both systemic and local insulin administration reduced Ci. These findings advance our understanding of the cerebrovascular response to acute insulin exposure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about the role of insulin in cerebrovascular control. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of systemic (intravenous) nor local (intranasal) insulin administration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity; however, both systemic and local insulin administration reduced cerebrovascular compliance. Our findings advance our understanding of the cerebrovascular response to insulin and may have implications in the context of known metabolic disturbances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology publishes original investigations, reviews and perspectives on the physiology of the heart, vasculature, and lymphatics. These articles include experimental and theoretical studies of cardiovascular function at all levels of organization ranging from the intact and integrative animal and organ function to the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal embraces new descriptions of these functions and their control systems, as well as their basis in biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology. Preference is given to research that provides significant new mechanistic physiological insights that determine the performance of the normal and abnormal heart and circulation.
期刊最新文献
High variability in the reproducibility of key hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt. Long-term hemodynamic responses and reverse remodeling after pharmacotherapy in HFpEF versus HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal cardiovascular research and education should be prioritized in the United States. Structural and functional remodeling for elite cyclists during exercise; pressure-volume loops and hemodynamic forces analysis. Comprehensive echocardiographic protocol for pigs with emphasis on diastolic function: advantages over MRI assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1