子宫腺肌症与宫颈癌之间的关系:回顾性队列研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2024.2430707
Tianying Yang, Xiaohong Chen, Keqin Hua, Chunbo Li
{"title":"子宫腺肌症与宫颈癌之间的关系:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Tianying Yang, Xiaohong Chen, Keqin Hua, Chunbo Li","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2024.2430707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main purpose of the study was to explore the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer (CC) and adenomyosis and without the latter and to gain insight into the timely association between adenomyosis and CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>991 patients with CC and adenomyosis and 3964 patients without the latter were included in this retrospective cohort study. The clinicopathological characteristics including tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), infiltration into vagina or uterine body, status of surgical vaginal margin, parametrial involvement, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis were compared between the CC patients with/without coexisting adenomyosis by Student's t-tests, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate potential risk factors. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the cervical cancer cohort, the coexistence of adenomyosis is associated with a lower likelihood of deep stromal invasion (50.2% vs 54.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and vaginal infiltration (25.8% vs 29.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.041) compared with CC patients without adenomyosis. There were no significant differences in tumor size, presence of LVSI, uterine body infiltration, status of surgical vaginal margin, parametrial involvement, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis between both groups. However, adenomyosis did not remain as an independent prognostic factor for CC (HR 0.938, 95% CI: [0.72-1.22], <i>p</i> = 0.636) and did not reach statistical significance in the survival analysis (log rank test, <i>p</i> = 0.587).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CC patients with coexistent adenomyosis were associated with less aggressive tumor behavior including deep stromal invasion and vaginal infiltration. However, adenomyosis was not a prognostic factor for CC survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":"2430707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Adenomyosis and Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tianying Yang, Xiaohong Chen, Keqin Hua, Chunbo Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2024.2430707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main purpose of the study was to explore the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer (CC) and adenomyosis and without the latter and to gain insight into the timely association between adenomyosis and CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>991 patients with CC and adenomyosis and 3964 patients without the latter were included in this retrospective cohort study. The clinicopathological characteristics including tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), infiltration into vagina or uterine body, status of surgical vaginal margin, parametrial involvement, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis were compared between the CC patients with/without coexisting adenomyosis by Student's t-tests, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate potential risk factors. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the cervical cancer cohort, the coexistence of adenomyosis is associated with a lower likelihood of deep stromal invasion (50.2% vs 54.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and vaginal infiltration (25.8% vs 29.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.041) compared with CC patients without adenomyosis. There were no significant differences in tumor size, presence of LVSI, uterine body infiltration, status of surgical vaginal margin, parametrial involvement, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis between both groups. However, adenomyosis did not remain as an independent prognostic factor for CC (HR 0.938, 95% CI: [0.72-1.22], <i>p</i> = 0.636) and did not reach statistical significance in the survival analysis (log rank test, <i>p</i> = 0.587).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CC patients with coexistent adenomyosis were associated with less aggressive tumor behavior including deep stromal invasion and vaginal infiltration. However, adenomyosis was not a prognostic factor for CC survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"2430707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2024.2430707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2024.2430707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究的主要目的是探讨宫颈癌(CC)合并子宫腺肌症和未合并子宫腺肌症患者的临床病理特征和生存结果,并深入了解子宫腺肌症与CC之间的及时关联。通过学生 t 检验、卡方检验或费雪精确检验比较了合并/不合并子宫腺肌症的 CC 患者的临床病理特征,包括肿瘤大小、基质浸润深度、淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)、阴道或子宫体浸润、手术阴道边缘状态、宫旁受累、盆腔或主动脉旁淋巴结转移。采用 Cox 比例危险模型评估潜在的风险因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法绘制生存曲线:结果:与无子宫腺肌症的宫颈癌患者相比,合并子宫腺肌症的宫颈癌患者发生深部间质浸润的可能性较低(50.2% vs 54.6%,P = 0.041)。两组患者在肿瘤大小、是否存在 LVSI、子宫体浸润、手术阴道边缘状态、宫旁受累、盆腔或主动脉旁淋巴结转移等方面无明显差异。然而,子宫腺肌症并不是CC的独立预后因素(HR 0.938,95% CI:[0.72-1.22],P = 0.636),在生存分析中也没有统计学意义(对数秩检验,P = 0.587):结论:合并子宫腺肌症的 CC 患者的肿瘤侵袭性较低,包括基质深层浸润和阴道浸润。结论:合并子宫腺肌症的CC患者肿瘤侵袭性较低,包括深层基质侵犯和阴道浸润,但子宫腺肌症并不是影响CC患者生存的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Adenomyosis and Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: The main purpose of the study was to explore the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer (CC) and adenomyosis and without the latter and to gain insight into the timely association between adenomyosis and CC.

Methods: 991 patients with CC and adenomyosis and 3964 patients without the latter were included in this retrospective cohort study. The clinicopathological characteristics including tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), infiltration into vagina or uterine body, status of surgical vaginal margin, parametrial involvement, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis were compared between the CC patients with/without coexisting adenomyosis by Student's t-tests, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate potential risk factors. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Among the cervical cancer cohort, the coexistence of adenomyosis is associated with a lower likelihood of deep stromal invasion (50.2% vs 54.6%, p < 0.0001) and vaginal infiltration (25.8% vs 29.1%, p = 0.041) compared with CC patients without adenomyosis. There were no significant differences in tumor size, presence of LVSI, uterine body infiltration, status of surgical vaginal margin, parametrial involvement, and pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis between both groups. However, adenomyosis did not remain as an independent prognostic factor for CC (HR 0.938, 95% CI: [0.72-1.22], p = 0.636) and did not reach statistical significance in the survival analysis (log rank test, p = 0.587).

Conclusion: CC patients with coexistent adenomyosis were associated with less aggressive tumor behavior including deep stromal invasion and vaginal infiltration. However, adenomyosis was not a prognostic factor for CC survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
期刊最新文献
Anterior, Posterior and Anterior-Posterior Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The HIF-1α/PKM2 Feedback Loop in Relation to EGFR Mutational Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Posttranscriptional Regulation of Intestinal Mucosal Growth and Adaptation by Noncoding RNAs in Critical Surgical Disorders. Statement of Retraction: Liver X Receptors Activation Attenuates Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of Liver Graft in Rats. Correlation Between Basal Metabolic Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1