治疗干槽症的新型局部敷料及其与 Alvogyl® 的疗效比较:随机对照临床试验。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.4317/medoral.26820
K Famili, M Gholami, A Shahri
{"title":"治疗干槽症的新型局部敷料及其与 Alvogyl® 的疗效比较:随机对照临床试验。","authors":"K Famili, M Gholami, A Shahri","doi":"10.4317/medoral.26820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a novel topical dressing (composed of triamcinolone, ground Dianthus caryophyllus, eugenol, honey, and Iris germanica) for alveolar osteitis (dry socket) against Alvogyl® (composed of eugenol, butamben, and iodoform).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a randomized parallel-armed clinical trial at Mashhad Dental School's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36 patients with alveolar osteitis were randomly allocated into two groups according to the inclusion criteria (n=18), using sealed envelopes: one receiving a novel topical dressing and the other receiving Alvogyl®. Post-treatment pain was assessed using a visual analog scale immediately after the procedure and at 30 and 60 minutes, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, and one week later, as well as the frequency of dressing applications and analgesic usage. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses were completed on all 36 participants without dropouts. No significant age or gender differences were found between the groups at baseline (p=0.370 and p=0.502, respectively). The novel dressing group experienced significantly lower pain scores at 30 and 60 minutes post-treatment (p<0.001), but higher scores at 24 (p=0.029), 48 (p=0.001), and 72 (p=0.017) hours, and similar pain scores immediately after the procedure and at 96 hours and 1 week (p>0.05), compared to the Alvogyl® group. The mean number of analgesics taken (p=0.097) and the mean frequency of dressing application (p=0.839) were not significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel topical dressing demonstrated efficacy comparable to Alvogyl®, with the added benefits of cost-effectiveness and the absence of side effects, suggesting its potential as an alternative treatment for dry socket.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel topical dressing for dry socket and comparison of its efficacy with that of Alvogyl®: A randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"K Famili, M Gholami, A Shahri\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/medoral.26820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a novel topical dressing (composed of triamcinolone, ground Dianthus caryophyllus, eugenol, honey, and Iris germanica) for alveolar osteitis (dry socket) against Alvogyl® (composed of eugenol, butamben, and iodoform).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a randomized parallel-armed clinical trial at Mashhad Dental School's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36 patients with alveolar osteitis were randomly allocated into two groups according to the inclusion criteria (n=18), using sealed envelopes: one receiving a novel topical dressing and the other receiving Alvogyl®. Post-treatment pain was assessed using a visual analog scale immediately after the procedure and at 30 and 60 minutes, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, and one week later, as well as the frequency of dressing applications and analgesic usage. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses were completed on all 36 participants without dropouts. No significant age or gender differences were found between the groups at baseline (p=0.370 and p=0.502, respectively). The novel dressing group experienced significantly lower pain scores at 30 and 60 minutes post-treatment (p<0.001), but higher scores at 24 (p=0.029), 48 (p=0.001), and 72 (p=0.017) hours, and similar pain scores immediately after the procedure and at 96 hours and 1 week (p>0.05), compared to the Alvogyl® group. The mean number of analgesics taken (p=0.097) and the mean frequency of dressing application (p=0.839) were not significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel topical dressing demonstrated efficacy comparable to Alvogyl®, with the added benefits of cost-effectiveness and the absence of side effects, suggesting its potential as an alternative treatment for dry socket.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26820\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:材料与方法:在马什哈德牙科学校口腔颌面外科进行的一项随机平行臂临床试验中,36 名牙槽骨炎患者被随机分配到两种不同的敷料中:在马什哈德牙科学校口腔颌面外科进行的一项随机平行臂临床试验中,36 名牙槽骨炎患者根据纳入标准(18 人)被随机分配到两组,使用密封信封:一组接受新型局部敷料,另一组接受 Alvogyl®。治疗后疼痛的评估采用视觉模拟量表,分别在术后30分钟、60分钟、24小时、48小时、72小时、96小时和一周后进行,同时还评估了敷料的使用频率和止痛药的使用情况。数据分析采用 SPSS 26.0 版进行:对所有 36 名参与者进行了分析,无一人退出。基线时各组之间没有发现明显的年龄或性别差异(p=0.370 和 p=0.502)。与 Alvogyl® 组相比,新型敷料组在治疗后 30 分钟和 60 分钟的疼痛评分明显较低(P0.05)。两组患者服用止痛药的平均次数(p=0.097)和使用敷料的平均频率(p=0.839)没有明显差异:新型局部敷料的疗效与 Alvogyl® 相当,同时还具有成本效益和无副作用的优点,这表明它有潜力成为治疗干槽症的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel topical dressing for dry socket and comparison of its efficacy with that of Alvogyl®: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel topical dressing (composed of triamcinolone, ground Dianthus caryophyllus, eugenol, honey, and Iris germanica) for alveolar osteitis (dry socket) against Alvogyl® (composed of eugenol, butamben, and iodoform).

Material and methods: In a randomized parallel-armed clinical trial at Mashhad Dental School's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36 patients with alveolar osteitis were randomly allocated into two groups according to the inclusion criteria (n=18), using sealed envelopes: one receiving a novel topical dressing and the other receiving Alvogyl®. Post-treatment pain was assessed using a visual analog scale immediately after the procedure and at 30 and 60 minutes, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, and one week later, as well as the frequency of dressing applications and analgesic usage. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.

Results: Analyses were completed on all 36 participants without dropouts. No significant age or gender differences were found between the groups at baseline (p=0.370 and p=0.502, respectively). The novel dressing group experienced significantly lower pain scores at 30 and 60 minutes post-treatment (p<0.001), but higher scores at 24 (p=0.029), 48 (p=0.001), and 72 (p=0.017) hours, and similar pain scores immediately after the procedure and at 96 hours and 1 week (p>0.05), compared to the Alvogyl® group. The mean number of analgesics taken (p=0.097) and the mean frequency of dressing application (p=0.839) were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions: The novel topical dressing demonstrated efficacy comparable to Alvogyl®, with the added benefits of cost-effectiveness and the absence of side effects, suggesting its potential as an alternative treatment for dry socket.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: 1. Oral Medicine and Pathology: Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on the oral cavity. 2. Oral Surgery: Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management of diseases affecting head and neck areas. 3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry: Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients. 4. Implantology 5. Periodontology
期刊最新文献
Novel topical dressing for dry socket and comparison of its efficacy with that of Alvogyl®: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Oral pathology in a population observed within an oral cancer screening developed in Portugal. Relationship between periodontitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a bibliometric analysis from 1945 to 2023. Telediagnosis performance of specialists in oral medicine and general dental practitioner using images of oral mucosa lesions in Chile. The 100 most influential articles in mouth breathing. A bibliometric and altmetric analysis: 2002-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1