{"title":"评估血液代谢物与脊柱疼痛之间的遗传因果效应:双向双样本孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Shuang Wu, Xing-Chen Zhou, Tao Li, Jia-Yu Sun, Long-Hao Chen, Zi-Cheng Wei, Kai-Zheng Wang, Shuang-Wei Hong, Hui-Nan Xu, Zhi-Zhen Lv, Li-Jiang Lv","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S487156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous metabolomics studies have indicated a close association between blood metabolites and pain. However, the causal relationship between blood metabolites and spinal pain (SP) remains unclear. This study employs a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal relationship between 452 blood metabolites and SP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to assess the causal relationship between blood metabolites and SP, including neck pain (NP), thoracic spine pain (TSP), low back pain (LBP), and back pain (BP). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data for 452 metabolites (7,824 participants) were used as exposure variables. Summary data for NP were obtained from the UK Biobank, for TSP from the FinnGen Biobank, and for LBP from both the UK Biobank and the FinnGen Biobank. Summary data for BP were obtained from the UK Biobank. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was used to estimate the causal relationships between metabolites and SP, complemented by various sensitivity analyses to account for pleiotropy and heterogeneity, ensuring robust results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVW analysis identified 155 metabolites associated with SP risk and 142 metabolites influenced by SP. No significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was observed through other analytical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates potential causal effects between blood metabolites and SP, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of SP. These findings lay a theoretical foundation for preventing and treating SP through targeted interventions on specific blood metabolites, potentially elucidating underlying biological mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"3897-3918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Genetic Causal Effects Between Blood Metabolites and Spinal Pain: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Wu, Xing-Chen Zhou, Tao Li, Jia-Yu Sun, Long-Hao Chen, Zi-Cheng Wei, Kai-Zheng Wang, Shuang-Wei Hong, Hui-Nan Xu, Zhi-Zhen Lv, Li-Jiang Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S487156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous metabolomics studies have indicated a close association between blood metabolites and pain. However, the causal relationship between blood metabolites and spinal pain (SP) remains unclear. This study employs a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal relationship between 452 blood metabolites and SP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to assess the causal relationship between blood metabolites and SP, including neck pain (NP), thoracic spine pain (TSP), low back pain (LBP), and back pain (BP). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data for 452 metabolites (7,824 participants) were used as exposure variables. Summary data for NP were obtained from the UK Biobank, for TSP from the FinnGen Biobank, and for LBP from both the UK Biobank and the FinnGen Biobank. Summary data for BP were obtained from the UK Biobank. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was used to estimate the causal relationships between metabolites and SP, complemented by various sensitivity analyses to account for pleiotropy and heterogeneity, ensuring robust results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVW analysis identified 155 metabolites associated with SP risk and 142 metabolites influenced by SP. No significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was observed through other analytical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates potential causal effects between blood metabolites and SP, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of SP. These findings lay a theoretical foundation for preventing and treating SP through targeted interventions on specific blood metabolites, potentially elucidating underlying biological mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3897-3918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S487156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S487156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the Genetic Causal Effects Between Blood Metabolites and Spinal Pain: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.
Background: Previous metabolomics studies have indicated a close association between blood metabolites and pain. However, the causal relationship between blood metabolites and spinal pain (SP) remains unclear. This study employs a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal relationship between 452 blood metabolites and SP.
Methods: We used bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to assess the causal relationship between blood metabolites and SP, including neck pain (NP), thoracic spine pain (TSP), low back pain (LBP), and back pain (BP). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data for 452 metabolites (7,824 participants) were used as exposure variables. Summary data for NP were obtained from the UK Biobank, for TSP from the FinnGen Biobank, and for LBP from both the UK Biobank and the FinnGen Biobank. Summary data for BP were obtained from the UK Biobank. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was used to estimate the causal relationships between metabolites and SP, complemented by various sensitivity analyses to account for pleiotropy and heterogeneity, ensuring robust results.
Results: The IVW analysis identified 155 metabolites associated with SP risk and 142 metabolites influenced by SP. No significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was observed through other analytical methods.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates potential causal effects between blood metabolites and SP, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of SP. These findings lay a theoretical foundation for preventing and treating SP through targeted interventions on specific blood metabolites, potentially elucidating underlying biological mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.