患者教育中的可读性指标:我们在哪里创新?

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinics and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.3390/clinpract14060183
Som Singh, Aleena Jamal, Fawad Qureshi
{"title":"患者教育中的可读性指标:我们在哪里创新?","authors":"Som Singh, Aleena Jamal, Fawad Qureshi","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14060183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing use of digital applications in healthcare has led to a greater need for patient education materials. These materials, often in the form of pamphlets, booklets, and handouts, are designed to supplement physician-patient communication and aim to improve patient outcomes. However, the effectiveness of these materials can be hindered by variations in patient health literacy. Readability, a measure of text comprehension, is a key factor influencing how well patients understand these educational materials. While there has been growing interest in readability assessment in medicine, many studies have demonstrated that digital texts do not frequently meet the recommended sixth-to-eighth grade reading level. The purpose of this opinion article is to review readability from the perspective of studies in pediatric medicine, internal medicine, preventative medicine, and surgery. This article aims to communicate that while readability is important, it tends to not fully capture the complexity of health literacy or effective patient communication. Moreover, a promising avenue to improve readability may be in generative artificial intelligence, as there are currently limited tools with similar effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 6","pages":"2341-2349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability Metrics in Patient Education: Where Do We Innovate?\",\"authors\":\"Som Singh, Aleena Jamal, Fawad Qureshi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract14060183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increasing use of digital applications in healthcare has led to a greater need for patient education materials. These materials, often in the form of pamphlets, booklets, and handouts, are designed to supplement physician-patient communication and aim to improve patient outcomes. However, the effectiveness of these materials can be hindered by variations in patient health literacy. Readability, a measure of text comprehension, is a key factor influencing how well patients understand these educational materials. While there has been growing interest in readability assessment in medicine, many studies have demonstrated that digital texts do not frequently meet the recommended sixth-to-eighth grade reading level. The purpose of this opinion article is to review readability from the perspective of studies in pediatric medicine, internal medicine, preventative medicine, and surgery. This article aims to communicate that while readability is important, it tends to not fully capture the complexity of health literacy or effective patient communication. Moreover, a promising avenue to improve readability may be in generative artificial intelligence, as there are currently limited tools with similar effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"2341-2349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14060183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14060183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着数字应用程序在医疗保健领域的应用越来越广泛,对患者教育材料的需求也越来越大。这些材料通常以小册子、手册和讲义的形式出现,旨在补充医生与患者之间的沟通,并改善患者的治疗效果。然而,这些材料的有效性可能会受到患者健康素养差异的影响。可读性是衡量文字理解能力的标准,是影响患者理解这些教育材料的关键因素。虽然人们对医学可读性评估的兴趣与日俱增,但许多研究表明,数字文本往往达不到建议的六至八年级阅读水平。本文旨在从儿科医学、内科医学、预防医学和外科医学研究的角度对可读性进行评述。本文旨在说明,虽然可读性很重要,但它往往不能完全反映健康素养或有效患者沟通的复杂性。此外,提高可读性的一个有前途的途径可能是人工智能生成,因为目前具有类似效果的工具还很有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Readability Metrics in Patient Education: Where Do We Innovate?

The increasing use of digital applications in healthcare has led to a greater need for patient education materials. These materials, often in the form of pamphlets, booklets, and handouts, are designed to supplement physician-patient communication and aim to improve patient outcomes. However, the effectiveness of these materials can be hindered by variations in patient health literacy. Readability, a measure of text comprehension, is a key factor influencing how well patients understand these educational materials. While there has been growing interest in readability assessment in medicine, many studies have demonstrated that digital texts do not frequently meet the recommended sixth-to-eighth grade reading level. The purpose of this opinion article is to review readability from the perspective of studies in pediatric medicine, internal medicine, preventative medicine, and surgery. This article aims to communicate that while readability is important, it tends to not fully capture the complexity of health literacy or effective patient communication. Moreover, a promising avenue to improve readability may be in generative artificial intelligence, as there are currently limited tools with similar effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extraperitoneal Open Radical Cystectomy: A New Standard in Frail Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer? Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: From Basics to Clinical and Nutritional Management. Clinical Acceptance of Digitally Produced Zirconia and Metal Post and Cores, Based on the Impression Method. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Parents Regarding Ophthalmological Screening of Preschool-Aged Children in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Running Cadence and the Influence on Frontal Plane Knee Deviations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1