创新的儿童微创胃牵拉术:SILS 和机器人辅助胃牵拉术。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Surgery International Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s00383-024-05900-z
Zafer Dokumcu, Ulgen Celtik, Samir Hasan, Coskun Ozcan, Ata Erdener
{"title":"创新的儿童微创胃牵拉术:SILS 和机器人辅助胃牵拉术。","authors":"Zafer Dokumcu, Ulgen Celtik, Samir Hasan, Coskun Ozcan, Ata Erdener","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05900-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the rationality, feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic gastric pull-up (SILS-GPU) and robot-assisted gastric pull-up (R-GPU) methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital records of patients who underwent gastric pull-up with either SILS-GPU or R-GPU between May2016 and January 2024 were reviewed. Demographics, diagnosis, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 12 patients (eight persistent corrosive esophageal stricture-PCES, four long gap esophageal atresia-LGEA), seven underwent SILS-GPU, while the remaining five underwent R-GPU. The choice of conduit route was based on the primary pathology (PCES/EA) and the presence of posterior mediastinal fibrosis and/or tracheomalacia. The posterior mediastinum was preferred in seven, intrathoracic in three, and retrosternal in two patients. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in seven patients, while transthoracic esophagectomy was performed in three. There were no instances of mortality or intraoperative complications related to the preferred technique. All patients except one with Down syndrome were able to feed orally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SILS-GPU and R-GPU are demonstrated to be safe and effective in the pediatric population, with relatively lower complication rates in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative minimally invasive gastric pull-up techniques in children: SILS and robot-assisted gastric pull-up.\",\"authors\":\"Zafer Dokumcu, Ulgen Celtik, Samir Hasan, Coskun Ozcan, Ata Erdener\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-024-05900-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the rationality, feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic gastric pull-up (SILS-GPU) and robot-assisted gastric pull-up (R-GPU) methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital records of patients who underwent gastric pull-up with either SILS-GPU or R-GPU between May2016 and January 2024 were reviewed. Demographics, diagnosis, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 12 patients (eight persistent corrosive esophageal stricture-PCES, four long gap esophageal atresia-LGEA), seven underwent SILS-GPU, while the remaining five underwent R-GPU. The choice of conduit route was based on the primary pathology (PCES/EA) and the presence of posterior mediastinal fibrosis and/or tracheomalacia. The posterior mediastinum was preferred in seven, intrathoracic in three, and retrosternal in two patients. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in seven patients, while transthoracic esophagectomy was performed in three. There were no instances of mortality or intraoperative complications related to the preferred technique. All patients except one with Down syndrome were able to feed orally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SILS-GPU and R-GPU are demonstrated to be safe and effective in the pediatric population, with relatively lower complication rates in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05900-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05900-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨单切口腹腔镜胃牵拉术(SILS-GPU)和机器人辅助胃牵拉术(R-GPU)方法的合理性、可行性、安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2016年5月至2024年1月期间接受SILS-GPU或R-GPU胃牵拉术患者的医院病历。结果:共 12 名患者(8 人)接受了 SILS-GPU 或 R-GPU 胃牵拉术:在总共 12 名患者(8 名持续性腐蚀性食管狭窄-PCES,4 名长间隙食管闭锁-LGEA)中,7 名接受了 SILS-GPU 手术,其余 5 名接受了 R-GPU 手术。导管路径的选择基于原发病变(PCES/EA)以及是否存在后纵隔纤维化和/或气管瘘。七名患者选择了后纵隔,三名患者选择了胸腔内,两名患者选择了胸骨后。七名患者进行了经食道食管切除术,三名患者进行了经胸腔食管切除术。没有出现与首选技术相关的死亡率或术中并发症。除一名患有唐氏综合症的患者外,所有患者都能进行口服喂食:结论:事实证明,SILS-GPU 和 R-GPU 在儿科人群中安全有效,儿童的并发症发生率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovative minimally invasive gastric pull-up techniques in children: SILS and robot-assisted gastric pull-up.

Aim: This study aims to explore the rationality, feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic gastric pull-up (SILS-GPU) and robot-assisted gastric pull-up (R-GPU) methods.

Methods: Hospital records of patients who underwent gastric pull-up with either SILS-GPU or R-GPU between May2016 and January 2024 were reviewed. Demographics, diagnosis, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Out of the total 12 patients (eight persistent corrosive esophageal stricture-PCES, four long gap esophageal atresia-LGEA), seven underwent SILS-GPU, while the remaining five underwent R-GPU. The choice of conduit route was based on the primary pathology (PCES/EA) and the presence of posterior mediastinal fibrosis and/or tracheomalacia. The posterior mediastinum was preferred in seven, intrathoracic in three, and retrosternal in two patients. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in seven patients, while transthoracic esophagectomy was performed in three. There were no instances of mortality or intraoperative complications related to the preferred technique. All patients except one with Down syndrome were able to feed orally.

Conclusion: SILS-GPU and R-GPU are demonstrated to be safe and effective in the pediatric population, with relatively lower complication rates in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
Association between nighttime/weekend visits and patient outcomes in children with blunt liver and spleen injuries. Innovative minimally invasive gastric pull-up techniques in children: SILS and robot-assisted gastric pull-up. A narrative review of the current available literature on the intersection between the climate crisis and paediatric surgical care. Omphalocele prevalence and co-occurring malformations: a nationwide register-based study of Danish live births in 1997-2021. Total colonic aganglionosis: management and long-term outcomes at a referral centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1