低风险分支导管内乳头状黏液瘤和不确定胰腺囊肿的自然史:囊肿大小对监测间隔的影响。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pancreatology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.014
Hwee-Leong Tan, Jonathan Hee, Jania Wu, Grace R S Lim, Damien M Y Tan, Albert S Low, Choon-Hua Thng, Ye-Xin Koh, Brian K P Goh
{"title":"低风险分支导管内乳头状黏液瘤和不确定胰腺囊肿的自然史:囊肿大小对监测间隔的影响。","authors":"Hwee-Leong Tan, Jonathan Hee, Jania Wu, Grace R S Lim, Damien M Y Tan, Albert S Low, Choon-Hua Thng, Ye-Xin Koh, Brian K P Goh","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal surveillance strategy for low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the natural history of low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts to determine optimal surveillance intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with radiologically-diagnosed low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts from 1998 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Low-risk BD-IPMN, worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) were defined as per existing guidelines. Patients were grouped into three categories based on cyst size at diagnosis: <10 mm, 10-19 mm and 20-29 mm. The size distribution and cumulative incidence of WF and HRS development were charted annually for the first five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1668 patients, with 794 (47.6 %), 652 (39.1 %) and 222 (13.3 %) with cysts <10 mm, 10-19 mm and 20-29 mm at baseline respectively. Overall WF and HRS development was seen in 11.7 % and 1.4 % of patients respectively, with higher proportion of WF (6.8 vs 9.8 vs 34.7 %, p < 0.001) and HRS (0.9 vs 1.4 vs 3.6 %, p = 0.011) development with increasing baseline size category. Cysts <10 mm had 94.3 % < 30 mm at five years, 2.0 % WF at one year and a single case of HRS at two years. Cysts 10-19 mm had 94.7 % < 30 mm at five years, 2.2 % WF at one year and the first incident case of HRS at one year. Cysts 20-29 mm had 63.8 % < 30 mm at five years, 9.5 % WF and 1.1 % (4 cases) HRS by one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline cyst size can be used to guide surveillance intervals for low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural history of low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and indeterminate pancreatic cysts: Implications on surveillance intervals by cyst size.\",\"authors\":\"Hwee-Leong Tan, Jonathan Hee, Jania Wu, Grace R S Lim, Damien M Y Tan, Albert S Low, Choon-Hua Thng, Ye-Xin Koh, Brian K P Goh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal surveillance strategy for low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the natural history of low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts to determine optimal surveillance intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with radiologically-diagnosed low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts from 1998 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Low-risk BD-IPMN, worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) were defined as per existing guidelines. Patients were grouped into three categories based on cyst size at diagnosis: <10 mm, 10-19 mm and 20-29 mm. The size distribution and cumulative incidence of WF and HRS development were charted annually for the first five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1668 patients, with 794 (47.6 %), 652 (39.1 %) and 222 (13.3 %) with cysts <10 mm, 10-19 mm and 20-29 mm at baseline respectively. Overall WF and HRS development was seen in 11.7 % and 1.4 % of patients respectively, with higher proportion of WF (6.8 vs 9.8 vs 34.7 %, p < 0.001) and HRS (0.9 vs 1.4 vs 3.6 %, p = 0.011) development with increasing baseline size category. Cysts <10 mm had 94.3 % < 30 mm at five years, 2.0 % WF at one year and a single case of HRS at two years. Cysts 10-19 mm had 94.7 % < 30 mm at five years, 2.2 % WF at one year and the first incident case of HRS at one year. Cysts 20-29 mm had 63.8 % < 30 mm at five years, 9.5 % WF and 1.1 % (4 cases) HRS by one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline cyst size can be used to guide surveillance intervals for low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低风险分支导管内乳头状粘液瘤(BD-IPMN)的最佳监测策略仍不明确。我们旨在评估低风险分支导管内乳头状粘液瘤/不确定胰腺囊肿的自然史,以确定最佳监测间隔时间:方法:我们对一家三级转诊中心 1998 年至 2021 年期间经放射学诊断为低风险 BD-IPMN/ 不确定胰腺囊肿的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据现有指南定义了低风险 BD-IPMN、令人担忧的特征(WF)和高风险标志物(HRS)。根据确诊时囊肿的大小将患者分为三类:结果:我们对 1668 名患者进行了研究,其中 794 人(47.6%)、652 人(39.1%)和 222 人(13.3%)患有囊肿:基线囊肿大小可用于指导低风险 BD-IPMN/ 不确定胰腺囊肿的监测间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Natural history of low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and indeterminate pancreatic cysts: Implications on surveillance intervals by cyst size.

Background: The optimal surveillance strategy for low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the natural history of low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts to determine optimal surveillance intervals.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with radiologically-diagnosed low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts from 1998 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Low-risk BD-IPMN, worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) were defined as per existing guidelines. Patients were grouped into three categories based on cyst size at diagnosis: <10 mm, 10-19 mm and 20-29 mm. The size distribution and cumulative incidence of WF and HRS development were charted annually for the first five years.

Results: We studied 1668 patients, with 794 (47.6 %), 652 (39.1 %) and 222 (13.3 %) with cysts <10 mm, 10-19 mm and 20-29 mm at baseline respectively. Overall WF and HRS development was seen in 11.7 % and 1.4 % of patients respectively, with higher proportion of WF (6.8 vs 9.8 vs 34.7 %, p < 0.001) and HRS (0.9 vs 1.4 vs 3.6 %, p = 0.011) development with increasing baseline size category. Cysts <10 mm had 94.3 % < 30 mm at five years, 2.0 % WF at one year and a single case of HRS at two years. Cysts 10-19 mm had 94.7 % < 30 mm at five years, 2.2 % WF at one year and the first incident case of HRS at one year. Cysts 20-29 mm had 63.8 % < 30 mm at five years, 9.5 % WF and 1.1 % (4 cases) HRS by one year.

Conclusion: Baseline cyst size can be used to guide surveillance intervals for low-risk BD-IPMN/indeterminate pancreatic cysts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
期刊最新文献
Natural history of low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and indeterminate pancreatic cysts: Implications on surveillance intervals by cyst size. Corrigendum to "Endoscopic and surgical drainage for pancreatic fluid collections are better than percutaneous drainage: Meta-analysis" [Pancreatol 20 1 (2020) 132-141]. Pancreatic atrophy is a predictor for exocrine pancreatic dysfunction: Data from a large cohort of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Next-generation sequencing improves diagnostic accuracy of imaging and carcinoembryonic antigen alone for pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Utilization of relative evaluation of pancreatic perfusion CT parameters to support appropriate pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1