Shiliang Liu, Baoqing Chen, Yujia Zhu, Sifen Wang, Xingyuan Cheng, Ruixi Wang, Yonghong Hu, Hui Liu, Qiaoqiao Li, Li Zhang, Lei Zhao, Mengzhong Liu, Mian Xi
{"title":"食管癌诱导化疗加化学放疗:随机对照试验的长期结果和探索性分析。","authors":"Shiliang Liu, Baoqing Chen, Yujia Zhu, Sifen Wang, Xingyuan Cheng, Ruixi Wang, Yonghong Hu, Hui Liu, Qiaoqiao Li, Li Zhang, Lei Zhao, Mengzhong Liu, Mian Xi","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous results of our trial demonstrated that the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to significantly improve the response rate or 3-year survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report long-term results and exploratory analyses to further evaluate the therapeutic value of IC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage II-IVA ESCC were randomly assigned to receive IC followed by CRT or CRT alone. The relationship between tumor response to IC and long-term survival was analyzed. Baseline tumor biopsies were collected for RNA-Seq to identify patients who may benefit from IC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eligible patients were randomized to either the IC + CRT group (n = 55) or the CRT group (n = 55). With a median follow-up of 74.9 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 31.8% in the IC + CRT group and 29.1% in the CRT group (P =.675; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58-1.43). Similarly, no significant differences were identified in 5-year progression-free survival between groups (30.5% vs 25.5%, P =.508; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.34). Patients who responded to IC had significantly better survival than nonresponders. A risk-score model incorporating 6 key genes to predict IC efficacy was also constructed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with definitive CRT alone, the addition of IC before CRT still failed to demonstrate superior survival in patients with unselected ESCC, based on long-term follow-up. However, because IC responders were associated with more favorable survival, potential molecular biomarkers were identified for selection of benefit population from IC.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT02403531.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: long-term results and exploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shiliang Liu, Baoqing Chen, Yujia Zhu, Sifen Wang, Xingyuan Cheng, Ruixi Wang, Yonghong Hu, Hui Liu, Qiaoqiao Li, Li Zhang, Lei Zhao, Mengzhong Liu, Mian Xi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyae295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous results of our trial demonstrated that the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to significantly improve the response rate or 3-year survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report long-term results and exploratory analyses to further evaluate the therapeutic value of IC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage II-IVA ESCC were randomly assigned to receive IC followed by CRT or CRT alone. The relationship between tumor response to IC and long-term survival was analyzed. Baseline tumor biopsies were collected for RNA-Seq to identify patients who may benefit from IC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eligible patients were randomized to either the IC + CRT group (n = 55) or the CRT group (n = 55). With a median follow-up of 74.9 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 31.8% in the IC + CRT group and 29.1% in the CRT group (P =.675; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58-1.43). Similarly, no significant differences were identified in 5-year progression-free survival between groups (30.5% vs 25.5%, P =.508; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.34). Patients who responded to IC had significantly better survival than nonresponders. A risk-score model incorporating 6 key genes to predict IC efficacy was also constructed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with definitive CRT alone, the addition of IC before CRT still failed to demonstrate superior survival in patients with unselected ESCC, based on long-term follow-up. However, because IC responders were associated with more favorable survival, potential molecular biomarkers were identified for selection of benefit population from IC.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT02403531.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们之前的试验结果表明,在确定性化放疗(CRT)之前加用诱导化疗(IC)未能显著提高局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的反应率或3年生存率。在此,我们报告了IC的长期结果和探索性分析,以进一步评估IC的治疗价值:方法:将既往未经治疗、无法切除的 II-IVA 期 ESCC 患者随机分配到接受 IC 后进行 CRT 或仅接受 CRT。分析了肿瘤对IC的反应与长期生存之间的关系。收集基线肿瘤活检组织进行RNA-Seq分析,以确定哪些患者可能从IC中获益:符合条件的患者被随机分配到 IC + CRT 组(n = 55)或 CRT 组(n = 55)。中位随访时间为 74.9 个月,IC + CRT 组的 5 年总生存率为 31.8%,CRT 组为 29.1%(P =.675;HR,0.91;95% CI,0.58-1.43)。同样,各组间的5年无进展生存率也无明显差异(30.5% vs 25.5%,P =.508;HR,0.86;95% CI,0.56-1.34)。对 IC 有反应的患者的生存率明显高于无反应者。此外,还构建了一个包含6个关键基因的风险评分模型,以预测IC的疗效:结论:根据长期随访结果,与单纯的确定性CRT相比,在CRT前加用IC仍不能证明未经选择的ESCC患者的生存率更高。然而,由于IC应答者的生存率更高,因此发现了潜在的分子生物标志物,用于选择IC的受益人群:临床试验注册:NCT02403531。
Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: long-term results and exploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Previous results of our trial demonstrated that the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to significantly improve the response rate or 3-year survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report long-term results and exploratory analyses to further evaluate the therapeutic value of IC.
Methods: Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage II-IVA ESCC were randomly assigned to receive IC followed by CRT or CRT alone. The relationship between tumor response to IC and long-term survival was analyzed. Baseline tumor biopsies were collected for RNA-Seq to identify patients who may benefit from IC.
Results: Eligible patients were randomized to either the IC + CRT group (n = 55) or the CRT group (n = 55). With a median follow-up of 74.9 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 31.8% in the IC + CRT group and 29.1% in the CRT group (P =.675; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58-1.43). Similarly, no significant differences were identified in 5-year progression-free survival between groups (30.5% vs 25.5%, P =.508; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.34). Patients who responded to IC had significantly better survival than nonresponders. A risk-score model incorporating 6 key genes to predict IC efficacy was also constructed.
Conclusions: Compared with definitive CRT alone, the addition of IC before CRT still failed to demonstrate superior survival in patients with unselected ESCC, based on long-term follow-up. However, because IC responders were associated with more favorable survival, potential molecular biomarkers were identified for selection of benefit population from IC.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.