[间叶肿瘤的分子检测:检测什么、何时检测、如何检测:综述,特别关注下一代免疫化学作为分子检测替代品的价值]。

Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2
Abbas Agaimy
{"title":"[间叶肿瘤的分子检测:检测什么、何时检测、如何检测:综述,特别关注下一代免疫化学作为分子检测替代品的价值]。","authors":"Abbas Agaimy","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the widespread use of diverse modern molecular testing tools, the last two decades have seen significant advances in the classification of soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, numerous molecularly defined new entities have been introduced and many established older entities have received more insightful molecular studies that have developed their classification further. The discrepant therapeutic and prognostic implications of this evolving complexity of the nosology of neoplastic diseases make the precise subtyping of soft tissue neoplasms unavoidable. However, these rapid developments of the modern diagnostic molecular pathology did not only offer efficient solutions to many complex classification issues, but they were accompanied by similarly complex and diverse emerging problems. Most importantly, these advances have not only challenged the historical dogma of some phenotypes that were once considered specific, but they also have questioned the value of diagnostic immunohistochemistry compared to emerging modern diagnostic molecular tools. Moreover, the central question of when to test, what to test, and how to test became more confusing. This review addresses the major molecular categories in soft tissue neoplasms, their characteristics, and the criteria to be used for selecting the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool to be used in individual cases with a special focus on the value of next generation immunohistochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Molecular testing in mesenchymal neoplasms: What, when, and how to test? : A review with a special focus on the value of next-generation immunochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing].\",\"authors\":\"Abbas Agaimy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the widespread use of diverse modern molecular testing tools, the last two decades have seen significant advances in the classification of soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, numerous molecularly defined new entities have been introduced and many established older entities have received more insightful molecular studies that have developed their classification further. The discrepant therapeutic and prognostic implications of this evolving complexity of the nosology of neoplastic diseases make the precise subtyping of soft tissue neoplasms unavoidable. However, these rapid developments of the modern diagnostic molecular pathology did not only offer efficient solutions to many complex classification issues, but they were accompanied by similarly complex and diverse emerging problems. Most importantly, these advances have not only challenged the historical dogma of some phenotypes that were once considered specific, but they also have questioned the value of diagnostic immunohistochemistry compared to emerging modern diagnostic molecular tools. Moreover, the central question of when to test, what to test, and how to test became more confusing. This review addresses the major molecular categories in soft tissue neoplasms, their characteristics, and the criteria to be used for selecting the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool to be used in individual cases with a special focus on the value of next generation immunohistochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着各种现代分子检测工具的广泛应用,过去二十年来,软组织肿瘤的分类取得了重大进展。具体地说,许多分子定义的新实体已经问世,许多已确立的老实体也得到了更深入的分子研究,从而进一步发展了它们的分类。肿瘤疾病命名学的复杂性不断发展,对治疗和预后产生了不同的影响,因此对软组织肿瘤进行精确的亚型分类是不可避免的。然而,现代诊断分子病理学的飞速发展不仅为许多复杂的分类问题提供了有效的解决方案,同时也带来了同样复杂多样的新问题。最重要的是,这些进展不仅挑战了一些曾被认为具有特异性的表型的历史教条,而且与新兴的现代诊断分子工具相比,也对免疫组化诊断的价值提出了质疑。此外,何时检测、检测什么、如何检测等核心问题也变得更加扑朔迷离。本综述探讨了软组织肿瘤的主要分子类别、其特点以及在个案中选择最合适的分子诊断工具的标准,并特别关注新一代免疫组化作为分子检测替代品的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Molecular testing in mesenchymal neoplasms: What, when, and how to test? : A review with a special focus on the value of next-generation immunochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing].

With the widespread use of diverse modern molecular testing tools, the last two decades have seen significant advances in the classification of soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, numerous molecularly defined new entities have been introduced and many established older entities have received more insightful molecular studies that have developed their classification further. The discrepant therapeutic and prognostic implications of this evolving complexity of the nosology of neoplastic diseases make the precise subtyping of soft tissue neoplasms unavoidable. However, these rapid developments of the modern diagnostic molecular pathology did not only offer efficient solutions to many complex classification issues, but they were accompanied by similarly complex and diverse emerging problems. Most importantly, these advances have not only challenged the historical dogma of some phenotypes that were once considered specific, but they also have questioned the value of diagnostic immunohistochemistry compared to emerging modern diagnostic molecular tools. Moreover, the central question of when to test, what to test, and how to test became more confusing. This review addresses the major molecular categories in soft tissue neoplasms, their characteristics, and the criteria to be used for selecting the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool to be used in individual cases with a special focus on the value of next generation immunohistochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Neuroendocrine tumors]. [Exanthematic drug eruption]. Erratum zu: Können wir trotz des rasanten Fortschritts in der Medizin und der wachsenden diagnostischen Anforderungen Generalist*innen bleiben? [Incidental diagnosis of lymphangioleiomyomatosis in gynecological surgery-a case series]. Erratum zu: Biomarker MET in der Tumorpathologie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1