小儿锁骨下中心静脉导管首次置管失败的风险因素以及单次置管对降低导管相关发病率的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hasna Bouchaira, Hind Ketata, Saloua Ammar, Riadh Mhiri
{"title":"小儿锁骨下中心静脉导管首次置管失败的风险因素以及单次置管对降低导管相关发病率的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hasna Bouchaira, Hind Ketata, Saloua Ammar, Riadh Mhiri","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this observational study was to investigate the risk factors of a failed first attempt at pediatric central venous catheter (CVC) placement and its impact on CVC-related morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, we included 3-month-to 5-year-old children proposed for infraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization consecutively sing the anatomic landmark technique. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included single-attempt catheter placements, and Group 2 included failed first attempts at catheter placement. The management protocol was standardized for all patients. After comparing the two groups, univariable logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors for a failed first attempt and to show the interest of the single-attempt catheter placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 pediatric CVC placements, the incidence of failed first attempts was 41.3% and its main risk factors were children with comorbidities (OR=3.11; 95%CI: 1.17-8.21), hematology and oncology patients (OR=5.6; 95%CI: 2.75-11.38), children with aplastic anemia (OR=3.05; 95%CI:1.388-6.705), and anesthesia sedation with I-Gel airway ventilation (OR=9.21; 95%CI: 1.080-78.5). On the other hand, a single-attempt catheter placement was a protective factor against catheter-related complications with OR=0.258 [0.12-0.55].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that a single-attempt CVC placement may reduce the incidence of complications. The knowledge of the main risk factors of failed first attempts is mandatory for taking necessary precautions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"33 21","pages":"S24-S31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for a failed first attempt at pediatric subclavian central venous catheters and the role of single-attempt placement in reducing catheter-related morbidity: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hasna Bouchaira, Hind Ketata, Saloua Ammar, Riadh Mhiri\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2024.0421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this observational study was to investigate the risk factors of a failed first attempt at pediatric central venous catheter (CVC) placement and its impact on CVC-related morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, we included 3-month-to 5-year-old children proposed for infraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization consecutively sing the anatomic landmark technique. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included single-attempt catheter placements, and Group 2 included failed first attempts at catheter placement. The management protocol was standardized for all patients. After comparing the two groups, univariable logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors for a failed first attempt and to show the interest of the single-attempt catheter placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 pediatric CVC placements, the incidence of failed first attempts was 41.3% and its main risk factors were children with comorbidities (OR=3.11; 95%CI: 1.17-8.21), hematology and oncology patients (OR=5.6; 95%CI: 2.75-11.38), children with aplastic anemia (OR=3.05; 95%CI:1.388-6.705), and anesthesia sedation with I-Gel airway ventilation (OR=9.21; 95%CI: 1.080-78.5). On the other hand, a single-attempt catheter placement was a protective factor against catheter-related complications with OR=0.258 [0.12-0.55].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that a single-attempt CVC placement may reduce the incidence of complications. The knowledge of the main risk factors of failed first attempts is mandatory for taking necessary precautions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"33 21\",\"pages\":\"S24-S31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本观察性研究旨在调查小儿中心静脉导管(CVC)置管首次尝试失败的风险因素及其对CVC相关发病率的影响:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们连续纳入了3个月至5岁的拟进行锁骨下静脉导管置入术的儿童,他们均采用解剖标志技术。患者被分为两组:第一组包括单次尝试导管置入的患者,第二组包括首次尝试导管置入失败的患者。所有患者的管理方案都是标准化的。在对两组进行比较后,采用单变量逻辑回归法研究首次尝试失败的风险因素,并显示单次尝试导管置入的意义:结果:在 150 例儿科 CVC 置管术中,首次尝试失败的发生率为 41.3%,其主要风险因素是患儿有合并症(OR=3.11;95%CI:1.17-8.21)、血液科和肿瘤科患儿(OR=3.11;95%CI:1.17-8.21)。21)、血液科和肿瘤科患者(OR=5.6;95%CI:2.75-11.38)、再生障碍性贫血患儿(OR=3.05;95%CI:1.388-6.705)、麻醉镇静与 I-Gel 气道通气(OR=9.21;95%CI:1.080-78.5)。另一方面,单次尝试导管置入是导管相关并发症的保护因素,OR=0.258 [0.12-0.55]:结论:单次尝试导管置入似乎可降低并发症的发生率。要采取必要的预防措施,就必须了解首次尝试失败的主要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for a failed first attempt at pediatric subclavian central venous catheters and the role of single-attempt placement in reducing catheter-related morbidity: a prospective observational study.

Introduction: The aim of this observational study was to investigate the risk factors of a failed first attempt at pediatric central venous catheter (CVC) placement and its impact on CVC-related morbidity.

Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study, we included 3-month-to 5-year-old children proposed for infraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization consecutively sing the anatomic landmark technique. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included single-attempt catheter placements, and Group 2 included failed first attempts at catheter placement. The management protocol was standardized for all patients. After comparing the two groups, univariable logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors for a failed first attempt and to show the interest of the single-attempt catheter placement.

Results: Among 150 pediatric CVC placements, the incidence of failed first attempts was 41.3% and its main risk factors were children with comorbidities (OR=3.11; 95%CI: 1.17-8.21), hematology and oncology patients (OR=5.6; 95%CI: 2.75-11.38), children with aplastic anemia (OR=3.05; 95%CI:1.388-6.705), and anesthesia sedation with I-Gel airway ventilation (OR=9.21; 95%CI: 1.080-78.5). On the other hand, a single-attempt catheter placement was a protective factor against catheter-related complications with OR=0.258 [0.12-0.55].

Conclusion: It seems that a single-attempt CVC placement may reduce the incidence of complications. The knowledge of the main risk factors of failed first attempts is mandatory for taking necessary precautions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big changes to the NHS patient safety landscape expected in 2025. Engaging and inspiring the next generation. Enhancing patient outcomes through proactive stoma care. Ensuring future-proofing through collaboration. Essential principles to apply when approaching a new job.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1