外周静脉导管的护理标准:循证专家共识。

Judy Thompson, Marlene M Steinheiser, J Blake Hotchkiss, James Davis, Michelle DeVries, Katie Frate, Robert Helm, Chris W Jungkans, Swapna Kakani, Sean Lau, Karen Lindell, Kristen McNiff Landrum, Karen A McQuillan, D J Shannon, Lorelle Wuerz, Stephanie Pitts
{"title":"外周静脉导管的护理标准:循证专家共识。","authors":"Judy Thompson, Marlene M Steinheiser, J Blake Hotchkiss, James Davis, Michelle DeVries, Katie Frate, Robert Helm, Chris W Jungkans, Swapna Kakani, Sean Lau, Karen Lindell, Kristen McNiff Landrum, Karen A McQuillan, D J Shannon, Lorelle Wuerz, Stephanie Pitts","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The insertion of a PIVC is the most commonly performed invasive procedure in healthcare. Despite its frequency in placement in hospitalized patients, PIVCs are generally perceived as being safe; however, the prevalence of failure ranges from 35%-50%. Additionally, complications are common and often deemed 'acceptable' by clinicians. Healthcare provider and clinician foundational knowledge and competency is lacking nationally. Considering the mere volume of PIVCs placed, the failure and complication rates, the human impact is significant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) has led a collaborative effort with representatives from the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), ECRI, and content experts representing nursing vascular access, infusion therapy, infection prevention, critical care, pediatrics, healthcare leadership, a physician, and a patient representative. Our aim is to provide concise guidance that will enhance and standardize practices related to PIVC. By consolidating current standards of practice into a comprehensive document, our framework seeks to advance the quality of care and improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This document has undergone meticulous scrutiny to ensure its quality, including incorporation of current standards, methodology for consensus from the expert panel, and input received from public comments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We anticipate that this work will have a significant impact on healthcare professionals, policymakers, and, most importantly, patients' experiences by the promotion of consistent, high-quality treatment, safety, and comfort for patients receiving a PIVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"33 21","pages":"S32-S46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of care for peripheral intravenous catheters: evidence-based expert consensus.\",\"authors\":\"Judy Thompson, Marlene M Steinheiser, J Blake Hotchkiss, James Davis, Michelle DeVries, Katie Frate, Robert Helm, Chris W Jungkans, Swapna Kakani, Sean Lau, Karen Lindell, Kristen McNiff Landrum, Karen A McQuillan, D J Shannon, Lorelle Wuerz, Stephanie Pitts\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2024.0422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The insertion of a PIVC is the most commonly performed invasive procedure in healthcare. Despite its frequency in placement in hospitalized patients, PIVCs are generally perceived as being safe; however, the prevalence of failure ranges from 35%-50%. Additionally, complications are common and often deemed 'acceptable' by clinicians. Healthcare provider and clinician foundational knowledge and competency is lacking nationally. Considering the mere volume of PIVCs placed, the failure and complication rates, the human impact is significant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) has led a collaborative effort with representatives from the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), ECRI, and content experts representing nursing vascular access, infusion therapy, infection prevention, critical care, pediatrics, healthcare leadership, a physician, and a patient representative. Our aim is to provide concise guidance that will enhance and standardize practices related to PIVC. By consolidating current standards of practice into a comprehensive document, our framework seeks to advance the quality of care and improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This document has undergone meticulous scrutiny to ensure its quality, including incorporation of current standards, methodology for consensus from the expert panel, and input received from public comments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We anticipate that this work will have a significant impact on healthcare professionals, policymakers, and, most importantly, patients' experiences by the promotion of consistent, high-quality treatment, safety, and comfort for patients receiving a PIVC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"33 21\",\"pages\":\"S32-S46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:插入 PIVC 是医疗领域最常见的侵入性操作。尽管 PIVC 频繁用于住院病人,但人们普遍认为 PIVC 是安全的;然而,失败率在 35%-50% 之间。此外,并发症也很常见,而且往往被临床医生认为是 "可以接受的"。在全国范围内,医疗服务提供者和临床医生都缺乏基础知识和能力。考虑到 PIVC 的使用量、失败率和并发症发生率,对人类的影响是巨大的:方法:血管通路协会 (AVA) 与输液护士协会 (INS)、美国重症监护护士协会 (AACN)、ECRI 的代表以及来自血管通路护理、输液治疗、感染预防、重症监护、儿科、医疗保健领导层、一名医生和一名患者代表的内容专家共同合作。我们的目标是提供简明的指导,以加强和规范与 PIVC 相关的实践。通过将当前的实践标准整合到一份全面的文件中,我们的框架旨在提高护理质量并改善患者安全:这份文件经过了严格的审查,以确保其质量,包括纳入现行标准、专家小组达成共识的方法以及从公众意见中获得的建议:我们预计,这项工作将对医护人员、政策制定者产生重大影响,最重要的是,通过促进接受 PIVC 的患者获得一致、高质量的治疗、安全和舒适,将对患者的体验产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards of care for peripheral intravenous catheters: evidence-based expert consensus.

Background: The insertion of a PIVC is the most commonly performed invasive procedure in healthcare. Despite its frequency in placement in hospitalized patients, PIVCs are generally perceived as being safe; however, the prevalence of failure ranges from 35%-50%. Additionally, complications are common and often deemed 'acceptable' by clinicians. Healthcare provider and clinician foundational knowledge and competency is lacking nationally. Considering the mere volume of PIVCs placed, the failure and complication rates, the human impact is significant.

Methods: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) has led a collaborative effort with representatives from the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), ECRI, and content experts representing nursing vascular access, infusion therapy, infection prevention, critical care, pediatrics, healthcare leadership, a physician, and a patient representative. Our aim is to provide concise guidance that will enhance and standardize practices related to PIVC. By consolidating current standards of practice into a comprehensive document, our framework seeks to advance the quality of care and improve patient safety.

Results: This document has undergone meticulous scrutiny to ensure its quality, including incorporation of current standards, methodology for consensus from the expert panel, and input received from public comments.

Conclusions: We anticipate that this work will have a significant impact on healthcare professionals, policymakers, and, most importantly, patients' experiences by the promotion of consistent, high-quality treatment, safety, and comfort for patients receiving a PIVC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big changes to the NHS patient safety landscape expected in 2025. Engaging and inspiring the next generation. Enhancing patient outcomes through proactive stoma care. Ensuring future-proofing through collaboration. Essential principles to apply when approaching a new job.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1