基于 SPM3 模型预测 CCMC CME/冲击事件的到达时间

Yidan Liang, 一丹 梁, Xinhua Zhao, 新华 赵, Nanbin Xiang, 南彬 向, Shiwei Feng, 士伟 冯, Fuyu Li, 富羽 李, Linhua Deng, 林华 邓, Miao Wan, 苗 万, Ran Li and 冉 李
{"title":"基于 SPM3 模型预测 CCMC CME/冲击事件的到达时间","authors":"Yidan Liang, 一丹 梁, Xinhua Zhao, 新华 赵, Nanbin Xiang, 南彬 向, Shiwei Feng, 士伟 冯, Fuyu Li, 富羽 李, Linhua Deng, 林华 邓, Miao Wan, 苗 万, Ran Li and 冉 李","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronal mass ejection (CME) is a powerful solar phenomenon that can lead to severe space weather events. Forecasting whether and when the corresponding interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) will reach the Earth is very important in space weather study and forecast. At present, many different kinds of models use the near-Sun CME observations as model inputs to predict its propagation with similar prediction accuracies for large sample events. Among a series of physics-based models, the best-performing version of the shock propagation model (SPM) for large sample events, i.e., SPM3, had achieved a good forecast effect for the 23rd Solar Cycle events (1997.02–2006.12). To further evaluate SPM3, we collected CME events from 2013 January to 2023 July from the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) CME scoreboard as a new data set. SPM3 achieved a total prediction success rate of 57% for these new events with a mean absolute error of 8.93 hr and a rms error of 10.86 hr for the shock's arrival time. Interestingly, SPM3 provided better predictions for the CME/shock events during high solar activity years than low solar activity years. We also analyzed the influence of input parameters on CME propagation and found that the larger the angular width of the CME event, the higher the probability of the corresponding IP shock's reaching the Earth. Source latitude had little effect on the arrival probability of the corresponding shock, while source longitude did. The CMEs originating from around W15° had the largest probability of hitting the Earth.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Arrival Times of the CCMC CME/Shock Events Based on the SPM3 Model\",\"authors\":\"Yidan Liang, 一丹 梁, Xinhua Zhao, 新华 赵, Nanbin Xiang, 南彬 向, Shiwei Feng, 士伟 冯, Fuyu Li, 富羽 李, Linhua Deng, 林华 邓, Miao Wan, 苗 万, Ran Li and 冉 李\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coronal mass ejection (CME) is a powerful solar phenomenon that can lead to severe space weather events. Forecasting whether and when the corresponding interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) will reach the Earth is very important in space weather study and forecast. At present, many different kinds of models use the near-Sun CME observations as model inputs to predict its propagation with similar prediction accuracies for large sample events. Among a series of physics-based models, the best-performing version of the shock propagation model (SPM) for large sample events, i.e., SPM3, had achieved a good forecast effect for the 23rd Solar Cycle events (1997.02–2006.12). To further evaluate SPM3, we collected CME events from 2013 January to 2023 July from the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) CME scoreboard as a new data set. SPM3 achieved a total prediction success rate of 57% for these new events with a mean absolute error of 8.93 hr and a rms error of 10.86 hr for the shock's arrival time. Interestingly, SPM3 provided better predictions for the CME/shock events during high solar activity years than low solar activity years. We also analyzed the influence of input parameters on CME propagation and found that the larger the angular width of the CME event, the higher the probability of the corresponding IP shock's reaching the Earth. Source latitude had little effect on the arrival probability of the corresponding shock, while source longitude did. The CMEs originating from around W15° had the largest probability of hitting the Earth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日冕物质抛射(CME)是一种强大的太阳现象,可导致严重的空间天气事件。预测相应的行星际日冕物质抛射(ICME)是否会到达地球以及何时到达地球,在空间天气研究和预报中非常重要。目前,许多不同类型的模型利用近太阳日冕物质抛射观测数据作为模型输入来预测其传播,对大样本事件的预测精度相近。在一系列基于物理学的模型中,针对大样本事件的冲击传播模型(SPM)的最佳版本,即 SPM3,对第 23 个太阳周期事件(1997.02-2006.12)取得了良好的预报效果。为了进一步评估SPM3,我们从社区协调建模中心(CCMC)的CME记分牌中收集了2013年1月至2023年7月的CME事件作为新的数据集。SPM3 对这些新事件的总预测成功率为 57%,平均绝对误差为 8.93 小时,冲击到达时间的均方根误差为 10.86 小时。有趣的是,与低太阳活动年相比,SPM3 对高太阳活动年的 CME/冲击事件提供了更好的预测。我们还分析了输入参数对 CME 传播的影响,发现 CME 事件的角宽度越大,相应的 IP 冲击到达地球的概率就越高。源纬度对相应冲击到达地球的概率影响不大,而源经度则有影响。源自 W15°附近的 CME 撞击地球的概率最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Arrival Times of the CCMC CME/Shock Events Based on the SPM3 Model
Coronal mass ejection (CME) is a powerful solar phenomenon that can lead to severe space weather events. Forecasting whether and when the corresponding interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) will reach the Earth is very important in space weather study and forecast. At present, many different kinds of models use the near-Sun CME observations as model inputs to predict its propagation with similar prediction accuracies for large sample events. Among a series of physics-based models, the best-performing version of the shock propagation model (SPM) for large sample events, i.e., SPM3, had achieved a good forecast effect for the 23rd Solar Cycle events (1997.02–2006.12). To further evaluate SPM3, we collected CME events from 2013 January to 2023 July from the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) CME scoreboard as a new data set. SPM3 achieved a total prediction success rate of 57% for these new events with a mean absolute error of 8.93 hr and a rms error of 10.86 hr for the shock's arrival time. Interestingly, SPM3 provided better predictions for the CME/shock events during high solar activity years than low solar activity years. We also analyzed the influence of input parameters on CME propagation and found that the larger the angular width of the CME event, the higher the probability of the corresponding IP shock's reaching the Earth. Source latitude had little effect on the arrival probability of the corresponding shock, while source longitude did. The CMEs originating from around W15° had the largest probability of hitting the Earth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiwavelength Campaign Observations of a Young Solar-type Star, EK Draconis. II. Understanding Prominence Eruption through Data-driven Modeling and Observed Magnetic Environment Compact Binary Merger Rate with Modified Gravity in Dark Matter Spikes Chemical Pathways of SO2 with Hydrogen Atoms on Interstellar Ice Analogues The Magnetic Field in Quiescent Star-forming Filament G16.96+0.27 Chemistry in the GG Tau A Disk: Constraints from H2D+, N2H+, and DCO+ High Angular Resolution ALMA Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1